State terrorism exists. Does anyone doubt it? State terrorism is carried out by many illiberal governments, which are friends and business associates of European countries. And it also is carried out by democratic states: Without going any further, our beloved Obama has approved the targeted killings in Afghanistan and even in Pakistan, which have increased in dramatic proportions compared to the Bush administration. Many of these actions are not even carried out by military force; the CIA takes charge of said actions by using drones controlled by a base in U.S. territory.
After the fall of the Berlin Wall, we started to believe that this European design would turn from a misty territory of utopias to one of tangible and effective realities. Our submission to the law did not help to resolve the Balkan wars quickly and efficiently. Serbia had to be stopped to prevent genocide in Kosovo without the help of international law. And then began an inclined period of restriction of rights. It happened in the Azores when many European countries were involved in the illegality of the Iraq war. This period continued after some new members accepted the secret CIA prisons and others authorized the flights and the extraordinary renditions of terrorism suspects. Then came the turn of the immigrants, who can be kept under detention without trial for 180 days, according to a European guideline and later on, expulsion on grounds of race in Italy and France.
Con la caÃda del muro de BerlÃn pudimos creer que este dibujo europeo pasarÃa del territorio brumoso de las utopÃas al de las realidades tangibles y eficaces. No sirvió nuestro sometimiento al derecho para resolver las guerras balcánicas con rapidez y eficacia. Hubo que contener a Serbia y evitar el genocidio en Kosovo sin el auxilio de la ley internacional. Pero luego empezó una nueva pendiente en la restricción de derechos. Sucedió en las Azores, cuando varios paÃses europeos se implicaron en la ilegalidad de la guerra de Irak. Siguió cuando algunos nuevos socios acogieron las cárceles secretas de la CIA y muchos otros autorizaron los vuelos y las entregas extraordinarias de sospechosos de terrorismo. Y luego llegó el turno a los inmigrantes, a los que se puede mantener bajo privación de libertad sin juicio hasta 180 dÃas, según una directiva europea. O las expulsiones por motivo de raza en Italia y Francia.
If this electoral gridlock [in domestic policy] does occur, it may well result in Trump — like several other reelected presidents of recent decades — increasingly turning to foreign policy.
Whether George HW Bush or Donald J Trump, Americanimperialism is unabated—the pathetic excuses and the violentshock-and-awe tactics don’t matter; the results do.
If this electoral gridlock [in domestic policy] does occur, it may well result in Trump — like several other reelected presidents of recent decades — increasingly turning to foreign policy.
What happened to this performing arts center is paradigmatic of how Trump’s second presidency ... [is] another front in a war ... to impose an autocratic regime led by a 21st century feudal lord outside of international law.