A Chinese Shadow over America

Published in La Tribune
(France) on 18 January 2011
by François Lenglet (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Rachel Towers. Edited by Piotr Bielinski.
The visit of China’s head of state, Hu Jintao, to the United States is going to keep alive the fiction of the “G-2” Summit — this condominium that would spearhead an exit to this crisis and aspire to reshape capitalism. If these two Pacific giants are united from here on out, specialists tell us, it’s only thanks to their mutual dependence: I scratch your back, you scratch mine. This principle is the main determinant of geopolitics in the 21st century. Nonsense, I say.

China is engaged in a gigantic offensive, a war without limits, which makes it clatter simultaneously on economic, strategic and military fronts, pushing its pawns around the chess board of the world. There isn’t a single day in which one of their businesses doesn’t set foot on our shores, in which Beijing doesn’t interfere in the public finances of such and such state strangled by debt, in which a new step isn’t taken towards weakening the American dollar in order to strengthen the Chinese yuan. Is there will of power on the part of these cruel and hardworking Chinese? If candor prevents understanding, paranoia, in turn, is not the best adviser.

We can simply observe that these empires are growing organically, as Robert Kaplan claims, rather than proceeding from a design. As they develop, new needs are cropping up in their countries, as well as new fears, which modify insensibly their relationships with their neighbors. Beijing has thus engaged in a military effort without precedent to secure its sea, the Sea of China, and the maritime routes that feed its growth in oil and natural resources. Let’s also remember that history has been hard on the “Doux-Commerce” theory, which results in peace brought on by economic and financial interdependence. Germany and Japan, in the 19th century, were also integrated in the world economy. When it comes to diplomacy, there’s only one real capital sin: the sin of naivety.


The visit of China’s head of state, Hu Jintao, to the United States is going to keep alive the fiction of the “G-2” Summit – this condominium that would spearhead an exit to this crisis and aspire to reshape capitalism. If these two Pacific giants are united from here on out, specialists tell us, it’s only thanks to their mutual dependence: I scratch your back, you scratch mine. This principle is the main determinant of geopolitics in the 21st century. Nonsense, I say.

China is engaged in a gigantic offensive, a war without limits, which makes it clatter simultaneously on economic, strategic and military fronts, pushing its pawns around the chess board of the world. There isn’t a single day in which one of their businesses doesn’t set foot on our shores, in which Beijing doesn’t interfere in the public finances of such and such state strangled by debt, in which a new step isn’t taken towards weakening the American dollar in order to strengthen the Chinese yuan. Is there will of power on the part of these cruel and hardworking Chinese? If candor prevents understanding, paranoia, in turn, is not the best adviser.

We can simply observe that these empires are growing organically, as Robert Kaplan claims, rather than proceeding from a design. As they develop, new needs are cropping up in their countries, as well as new fears, which modify insensibly their relationships with their neighbors. Beijing has thus engaged in a military effort without precedent to secure its sea, the Sea of China, and the maritime routes that feed its growth in oil and natural resources. Let’s also remember that history has been hard on the “Doux-Commerce” theory, which results in peace brought on by economic and financial interdependence. Germany and Japan, in the 19th century, were also integrated in the world economy. When it comes to diplomacy, there’s only one real capital sin: the sin of naivety.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

United Arab Emirates: Were Trump’s Military Powers Revoked?

Poland: Europe Hears ‘Enough’ from the US: Clever Poles Refuse To Believe It

Egypt: Egypt and the United States: Building the Next Generation of Strategic Partnership

Saudi Arabia: NATO’s Photo-Op in Ankara

Topics

Mexico: The End of the USMCA: A Turning Point for Emancipation

Japan: New York State Legislature Bill Abolishing the Writing of Mother and Father Is Strange

Saudi Arabia: Could There Be a NATO Without the US?

Saudi Arabia: NATO’s Photo-Op in Ankara

Poland: Europe Hears ‘Enough’ from the US: Clever Poles Refuse To Believe It

China: South Korea Must Reflect on America’s Untrustworthiness

Austria: Birthright Citizenship: They Won the Battle, but Not the War

United Arab Emirates: Were Trump’s Military Powers Revoked?

Related Articles

Saudi Arabia: A World without NATO… What Would It Look Like?

Israel: Faced with Diplomatic Impotence, War against Iran Is Legitimate

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine