Who Is Averting the Danger?

Published in Thawra al-Wehda
(Syria) on 26 ِApril 2012
by Dr. Hayder Hayder (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by David Bishop. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
Colin Powell, the former U.S. Secretary of State, acknowledges that the sanctions imposed on other countries by Washington continually reflect the United State's image, it being a symbol of haughtiness and arrogance.

U.S. researchers are of the opinion that the damage caused by weapons of mass destruction is slight in comparison to the destruction and devastation caused by economic sanctions, but the plain truth is that unilateral or UN economic sanctions are unjust, coercive and illegal, as affirmed by experts in international law. It is true that they have a negative effect, have severe consequences and increase the suffering of peoples and countries, but it is also true that they have not achieved their declared goals. Thus, they are being used for colonial ends to impose hegemony and influence and plunder the peoples’ riches, and they are incompatible with the principles of international law and the charter of the United Nations, which prohibits intervention in other countries' internal affairs.

Finally, it is also true to say: We are indeed witnessing a global awakening to avert the danger of those unjust sanctions. The stances of Russia and China, and numerous other countries, toward Syria affirm what we are driving at.


من يدرأ خطرها؟

قاعدة الحدث
الخميس 26-4-2012
د. حيدر حيدر
يعترف كولن باول، وزير الخارجية الأميركية الأسبق بأن عقوبات واشنطن المفروضة على الدول الأخرى تعكس باستمرار صورة أميركا، كونها رمزاً للغطرسة والعجرفة.

ويرى باحثون أميركيون أن الدمار الذي تسببه أسلحة الدمار الشامل، يتضاءل بالمقارنة مع الدمار والخراب الذي تسببه العقوبات الاقتصادية، لكن الحقيقة الساطعة، هي أن العقوبات الاقتصادية الانفرادية أو الأممية مجحفة وقهرية وغير قانونية، كما يؤكد خبراء القانون الدولي، وصحيح أنها تؤثر سلباً ولها عواقب خطيرة، وهي تزيد من معاناة الشعوب والدول، لكن الصحيح أيضاً أنها لم تحقق أهدافها المعلنة، وبالتالي فهي تستعمل لغايات استعمارية لفرض الهيمنة والنفوذ وسلب ثروات الشعوب، وهي تتنافى مع مبادئ القانون الدولي وميثاق الأمم المتحدة الذي يحظر التدخل في الشؤون الداخلية للدول الأخرى.‏‏

وأخيراً فإنه صحيح أيضاً القول: إننا نشهد صحوة عالمية لدرء خطر تلك العقوبات المجحفة، ومواقف روسيا والصين، ودول أخرى عديدة تجاه سورية، تؤكد ما نرمي إليه.‏‏
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: Donald Trump ‘Would Get Ratings Bump for Firing Pete Hegseth,’ Like on ‘The Apprentice’

Ireland: Europe Must Stand Up to Trump if Our Freedoms Are To Be Preserved

Ireland: The Irish Times View on the US Midterms: Blue Wave Engulfs Trump

Saudi Arabia: US Voters Care about the Rent, Not the War

Canada: Democrats Never Defended Canada from Trump’s Threats

Topics

Germany: Debacle for Republicans — but It’s Still Not the End for Trump

Australia: Donald Trump ‘Would Get Ratings Bump for Firing Pete Hegseth,’ Like on ‘The Apprentice’

Australia: Why Cost of Living Concerns Are Upending Global Politics

Ireland: Irish Examiner View: Time for US Democrats To Plan

Mexico: United States: The Offended Party’s Turn

Japan: US Republican Party Defeat: A Heavy Anti-Trump Judgment

China: 4 ‘Surprises’ in the US Midterm Elections

Egypt: Trump Is Drowning in the Blue Flood

Related Articles

Saudi Arabia: Is Trump Redefining the Relationship with Israel?

Saudi Arabia: The Gulf-US Meeting and Priorities after Signing the MoU

Qatar: Those Who Believe America Will Leave the Region after the War Are Deluded — and Here’s Why

Saudi Arabia: US Shift in Syria Signals New Era in Ties with Turkey

Saudi Arabia: Transitional Dualism and the Role Required of America