The Sense of Humor

Published in La Vanguardia
(Spain) on 7 May 2012
by Màrius Carol (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Drew Peterson-Roach. Edited by Casey J. Skeens.
In the U.S., they consider it essential that a president be able to laugh at himself.

Every year around this time for almost a century, the president of the United States has been the star invitee at the White House Correspondents’ Dinner. The commander-in-chief becomes humorist-in-chief for a day, no matter if the nation is at war or in a depressed economy. On this day, the most powerful man on Earth is obliged for a half hour to demonstrate that he is capable of laughing at himself, but also at his rivals. To see a serious fellow like Barack Obama mocking those who accuse him of not being born in the United States with images from the movie "The Lion King" on the screen as though they were home movies, or making fun of those who assert that he ate dog while living in Indonesia by asking, “What's the difference between a hockey mom and a pit bull? A pitbull is delicious.” This would be inconceivable in Europe. And not just now, when the public are in no mood for jokes and are throwing coffee on politicians.

But Americans see it in a different way. Humor is perceived as a modern form of communication, as has been demonstrated by its greatest masters being American. Vicente Verdú wrote in an essay entitled “El planeta americano” that an intellectual who wishes to influence should be witty in his essays, that a professor leading a class should have a joke ready for the beginning or ending of his lessons. The same goes for a politician: he has to be a clever guy, capable of joking even about his own defects. Barack Obama said in the Hilton hotel before 2,000 invitees to the correspondents’ dinner: “We gather during a historic anniversary. Last year at this time ... we finally delivered justice to one of the world's most notorious individuals.” And on the screen, bin Laden didn’t appear as everyone had expected, but rather millionaire Donald Trump, who raised doubts about the president’s Americanness.

Richard Nixon bombed at these dinners that bring together the cream of society and American movie stars. Jimmy Carter viewed it as an all but unbearable waste of time. On the other hand, Ronald Reagan enjoyed them in his role as an actor, as did George W. Bush in his frivolous capacity. In 2005, his wife Laura stepped onto the stage to tease her husband, who had hardly begun speaking: “Not that old joke — not again!” Mrs. Bush remarked that at the dinner’s late hour, her husband would usually be sound asleep, as would Vice President Cheney — “I'm a desperate housewife” — going to the point of saying, “George, if you really want to end tyranny in the world, you’re going to have to stay up later.”

The nineteenth-century American philosopher Ralph Waldo Emerson wrote that humor is a tie binding men together, and this is something present in American DNA. The matter is more complicated when they are joking around with the rest of the world.


Cada año, por estas fechas, el presidente de Estados Unidos es la estrella invitada, desde hace un siglo, en la cena de corresponsales de prensa. El comandante en jefe se convierte por un día en humorista en jefe, poco importa si el país está en guerra o si está deprimido por la economía. Ese día, el hombre más poderoso de la Tierra está obligado durante media hora a demostrar que es capaz de reírse de sí mismo, pero también de sus rivales. Ver a un tipo serio como Barack Obama mofarse de quienes le acusan de no haber nacido en Estados Unidos con unas imágenes de la película El libro de la selva en la pantalla como si se tratara de una filmación familiar, o burlarse de quienes aseguran que comió perro cuando vivía en Indonesia al afirmar que "la diferencia entre Palin y un pitbull es que este está sabroso" serían impensables en Europa. Y no sólo ahora, cuando los ciudadanos están para pocas bromas y proyectan sobre los políticos su mal café.

Pero los norteamericanos lo ven de otra manera. El sentido del humor se percibe como una forma de comunicación moderna, como lo demuestra que sus grandes maestros son estadounidenses. Vicente Verdú escribió en un ensayo titulado El planeta americano que el intelectual que pretenda influir debe ser chispeante en sus ensayos, el profesor que imparte una clase ha de tener dispuesta una chanza al comienzo o en el transcurso de la lección. Y lo mismo vale para el político: ha de ser un hombre ingenioso, capaz de bromear hasta de sus propios defectos. Barack Obama dijo en el hotel Hilton ante 2.000 invitados a la cena de los corresponsales: "Estamos ante un histórico aniversario, hace un año finalmente hicimos justicia con uno de los más notorios individuos". Y en la pantalla no apareció Bin Laden como todos esperaban, sino el millonario Donald Trump, que puso en duda la americanidad del presidente.

Richard Nixon lo pasaba fatal durante estas cenas que congregan a lo más granado de la sociedad -y de las estrellas de cine- del país, y a Jimmy Carter le parecía una pérdida de tiempo poco menos que insoportable. En cambio, Ronald Reagan las disfrutaba en su condición de actor y George Bush jr., en su calidad de frívolo. En el 2008, su esposa Laura salió a escena para burlarse de su marido, nada más empezar: "¡Oh, no, otra vez el mismo chiste no, por favor!". La señora Bush comentó que su marido a la hora de aquella cena dormía como un tronco, igual que su vicepresidente Cheney -"Lynne y yo sí somos mujeres desesperadas"- hasta el punto que le dijo: "George, si realmente quieres acabar con la tiranía en el mundo tienes que acostarte un poco más tarde".

El filósofo estadounidense del XIX Ralph W. Emerson escribió que lo cómico es un lazo de unión entre los hombres y eso es algo que está en el ADN americano. La cosa se complica cuando bromean del resto del mundo.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Topics

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?