Curiosity on Mars

Published in El País
(Spain) on 7 August 2012
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Tabitha Middleton . Edited by Drue Fergison.
The NASA robot won't find life on the red planet, but it's a new light for science.

The question will surely be asked: Why go to Mars with all the problems we have on Earth? The question is relevant and deserves an answer. The Curiosity robot's landing in the Gale crater — a hole close to the neighboring planet's equator, caused by a meteoric impact 3,500 years ago — is first of all an unprecedented technical feat, a masterpiece of human engineering, and therefore the latest in the line of the same venerable tradition that spawned our bridges and railways, the machines that run on them and the energy that fuels them, the same that has illuminated our streets and our homes, that allows us to navigate and fly, the same that invented communications and imagined computers, that transformed medieval society into the interconnected world of free citizens that we try to be.

Going to Mars is not the opposite of helping humanity; it is the same. Cold War-era criticism of space exploits didn't make much sense either. Now no one is trying to win a race against the Russians to plant a flag on a piece of stony extraterrestrial ground. If there's anything that NASA, the ESA and the other space agencies of the world have to fight against now, it's the budget shortages of their own governments. And if the American agency occasionally tends to certain publicity excesses, it isn't to proclaim the superiority of the lineage founded by the Mayflower passengers, but to get money from the capitol.

The Curiosity robot didn't go to the red planet to find life. It won't find it, even if it were treading over it right now with its six wheels, because it is not ready for it. Maybe one day there will be money for that experiment, but now we're in a time of budget cuts, here and on Mars. And no, Curiosity was not planted in the Gale crater to be the cornerstone of a new Martian colony, or to plant transgenic crops that will feed its future inhabitants. But its goals are among the most worthy of those which our species is capable of conceiving: a deeper knowledge of the neighboring planet, its geology and its history, which are also those of our cosmic neighborhood.

Why go to Mars? The name of the robot says it: for curiosity, the real driving force of science.


Curiosidad en Marte

El robot de la NASA no hallará vida en el planeta rojo, pero es una nueva luz para la ciencia.

La pregunta volverá a escucharse estos días con toda seguridad: ¿Para qué ir a Marte con todos los problemas que tenemos en la Tierra? La pregunta es pertinente y merece responderse. El aterrizaje del robot Curiosity en el cráter Gale —un boquete abierto junto al ecuador del planeta vecino por el impacto de un meteorito hace 3.500 millones de años— es en primer lugar una proeza técnica sin precedentes: una obra maestra de la ingeniería humana, y por tanto la última heredera de la misma venerable tradición que engendró nuestros puentes y ferrocarriles, las máquinas que circulan sobre ellos y la energía que las hace funcionar; la misma que ha iluminado nuestras calles y nuestras casas, que nos permite navegar y volar, que ha inventado las comunicaciones e imaginado los ordenadores; la misma que ha transformado la sociedad medieval en el interconectado mundo de ciudadanos libres que pretendemos ser.

Ir a Marte no es lo contrario de ayudar a la humanidad: es lo mismo. Las críticas a las hazañas espaciales de la guerra fría tampoco tienen ya mucho sentido. Ya nadie está intentando ganar una carrera a los rusos para clavar una bandera en un pedregal extraterrestre. Si con alguien tienen que luchar ahora la NASA, la ESA y las demás agencias espaciales del mundo es contra la escasez presupuestaria de sus propios Gobiernos. Y si la agencia norteamericana tiende ocasionalmente a ciertos excesos propagandísticos no es ya para proclamar la superioridad de la estirpe fundada por los pasajeros del Myflower, sino para pedir fondos al Capitolio.

El robot Curiosity no ha ido al planeta rojo a buscar vida. No la encontraría ni aun cuando la estuviera pisando ahora mismo con sus seis ruedas, porque no está preparado para ello. Quizá algún día haya dinero para ese experimento, pero de momento corren tiempos de recortes presupuestarios, aquí y en Marte. Y no, Curiosity tampoco ha ido a plantar en el cráter Gale la primera piedra de una colonia marciana, ni a sembrar cereales transgénicos que alimenten a sus futuros habitantes. Pero sus objetivos se encuentran entre los más dignos que es capaz de concebir nuestra especie: profundizar en el conocimiento del planeta vecino, de su geología y de su historia, que es también la de nuestra vecindad cósmica.

¿Por qué ir a Marte? El nombre del robot lo dice: por curiosidad, la verdadera fuerza motriz de la ciencia.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Topics

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?