The Connecticut Massacre

Published in La Vanguardia
(Spain) on 15 December 2012
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Stuart Taylor. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Yesterday the United States experienced the biggest massacre ever seen in an American school. Some 30 people, among them 20 children and between 5 and 10 adults, perished in a Newtown school (in Connecticut) at the hand of 20-year-old shooter Adam Lanza, who also died.* The attacker, son of a teacher at the school who he also murdered after killing his father in his own home, burst into the Sandy Hook Elementary School’s kindergarten at 9:40 am local time and opened fire on children and staff at the center.** Some pupils were evacuated. Subsequently, a brother of the murderer appeared dead in New Jersey.***

President Obama was punctually informed about the events, as the school remained surrounded by the police and medical teams. The country was shaken by a tragedy with which they are all too familiar, although none of the previous attacks were as severe as far as the loss of human life is concerned. Until now, the biggest number of deaths seen in schools took place on April 20, 1999 in Columbine High School in Colorado. On that day, 18-year-old Eric Harris and 17-year-old Dylan Klebold — both pupils at the school — entered with rifles, a pistol, a bomb and various home-made explosives, murdered 13 people and injured a further 25. Both committed suicide after carrying out this brutal crime. The last mass murder with similar characteristics to yesterday’s occurred in an Aurora, Colorado cinema on July 20 of this year. 24-year-old student James Eagan Holmes caused the death of 12 people and injured 58 more after bursting into the premiere of The Dark Knight Rises, armed with a semiautomatic rifle, a shotgun and a pistol (leaving a second in his car that was parked in front of the cinema). The criminal was detained on the spot.

The Connecticut tragedy has put the relationship between violence and the gun possession system that dominates the U.S. back on the table, in a place that authorizes the sale and possession of guns — with practically no limitations — under the protection of the second amendment of the Constitution and the right to self-defense. After the Aurora slaughter, President Obama promised to put legal measures in place in order to limit free access to certain types of weaponry that can even be acquired in large shopping centers. But Obama defended the irrevocability of the Second Amendment, just as the conservative sectors also do. There is an important reason for this: An overwhelming majority of U.S. citizens are in favor of owning a gun. 300 million of these weapons are in the hands of citizens.

Although similar acts have come to pass in countries where gun legislation is the polar opposite, it seems clear that the supposed advantages of a lenient legal system are suffering at the hand of personal and collective risks that entail free possession, leading to tragedies that could perhaps have been avoided.

*Editor’s Note: The final death toll was 27 people.
**Editor's Note: The mother was not a teacher at the school, and Adam Lanza did not kill his father.
***Editor's Note: Lanza's brother was not killed.


ESTADOS Unidos vivió ayer la mayor matanza jamás causada en una escuela en su territorio. Unas 30 personas, entre ellas 20 niños de entre 5 y 10 años, perecieron en una escuela de Newtown (Connecticut), por los disparos realizados por Adam Lanza, de 24 años, quien también murió. El asaltante, hijo de una trabajadora del centro a la que también asesinó tras matar a su padre en su propia casa, irrumpió en la guardería de la escuela elemental Sandy Hook a las 9.40 hora local y abrió fuego sobre los niños y el personal del centro. Algunos escolares pudieron ser evacuados. Posteriormente apareció muerto un hermano del asesino en Nueva Jersey.

El presidente Obama fue informado puntualmente de los acontecimientos mientras la escuela permanecía rodeada por la policía y los equipos médicos. El país asistió conmocionado a una tragedia que no es la primera vez que se produce, si bien ninguna de las anteriores había alcanzado tal magnitud en lo que se refiere a pérdida de vidas humanas. En el ámbito escolar, el mayor número de muertes se había producido hasta ahora el 20 de abril de 1999 en la escuela secundaria de Columbine, en Colorado, donde Eric Harris, de 18 años, y Dylan Klebold, de 17, dos alumnos del centro pertrechados con rifles de asalto, una carabina, una pistola, una bomba y diversos artefactos explosivos caseros, asesinaron a 13 personas e hirieron a otras 25 -ambos se suicidaron tras cometer la brutal acción-. El último asesinato masivo de características similares al de ayer se produjo en un cine de Aurora (Colorado), el 20 de julio de este año. Un estudiante de 24 años, James Eagan Holmes, causó la muerte de 12 personas e hirió a otras 58 tras irrumpir en la sala, donde se estrenaba el filme The dark night rises, armado con un fusil semiautomático, una escopeta y una pistola -una segunda la dejó en el coche, aparcado ante el local-. El criminal fue detenido allí mismo.

La tragedia de Connecticut ha vuelto a poner sobre el tapete la relación entre la violencia y el régimen de tenencia de armas que rige en EE.UU., donde se autoriza la venta y posesión particular, prácticamente sin limitaciones, al amparo de la segunda enmienda de la Constitución y el derecho a la autodefensa. Tras la matanza de Aurora, el presidente Obama se comprometió a impulsar medidas legales para limitar el libre acceso a determinados tipos de armamento que pueden ser adquiridos incluso en grandes centros comerciales. Pero Obama defendió la inderogabilidad de la segunda enmienda, como también defienden los sectores conservadores. Hay una razón de peso: una amplísima mayoría de los norteamericanos son partidarios de poseer armas. 300 millones de ellas están en manos ciudadanas. Ahora bien, aunque en países donde la normativa sobre la tenencia de armas es diametralmente la opuesta también se han producido actos similares, parece claro que las supuestas ventajas de la permisividad legal palidecen ante los riesgos personales y colectivos que entraña la libre posesión, ante tragedias que quizá se podrían haber evitado.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Topics

Afghanistan: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Germany: The Tariffs Have Side Effects — For the US Too*

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?