Intercollegiate Cooperation Strengthens American Higher Education

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 17 May 2013
by Menghan Shen (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dagny Dukach. Edited by Kathleen Weinberger.
America’s most acclaimed and emulated cultural achievement is its universities. However, under the present financial crisis and increasingly deep impact of globalization, American colleges and universities are considering change in their attempt to retain their position as the global leader in higher education. One strategy is to strengthen structures for intercollegiate cooperation so that each school’s education and human resources become organically integrated. This ensures that the education system — which is gradually growing imbalanced and bears huge pressures — will achieve sustainable development moving forward.

Because many American schools share common religious beliefs and traditions, they often form alliances. They are as close as brothers and each has its own merits. When it comes to cooperation between campuses, the Five College Consortium in Massachusetts, the Three College Consortium in California, and the Tri-College Consortium in Pennsylvania are representative examples. This author’s alma mater, Bryn Mawr College, is one of the schools in Pennsylvania’s Tri-College Consortium. The other two colleges are Swarthmore and Haverford. Students can select courses at will from any of these three schools and can even choose a major offered at one of the other schools. In addition to attending classes, students can also share each other’s dining halls and library systems.

In addition to the necessity of shared hardware between allied schools, compatible software is the real key to creating a compatible intercollegiate alliance. Because schools have a limited supply of qualified teachers, they cannot simultaneously offer the courses required for every major. As an example of two schools with very close relations, Haverford and Bryn Mawr carefully designed a plan whereby each school would offer courses that the other did not. For example, in the same semester, Bryn Mawr might offer a microeconomics course while Haverford would offer a macroeconomics course. In order to make interaction between students at the two schools more convenient, the schools staggered the start and end times of classes by 10 minutes, and also ran a bus service that ran between the two schools every 15 minutes.

In addition to the marriage of two liberal arts colleges, there is also cooperation between liberal arts colleges and large comprehensive universities. Columbia University and Barnard College are an example of this sort of relationship. Although their finances and student bodies are independent, when Barnard awards degrees, they are issued under the name of Columbia University. Students at Barnard can enjoy the academic resources of Columbia and draw on the large university’s superiority in specialized fields; the college allows students with an interest in engineering to continue their studies at Columbia after studying at a liberal arts college. This sort of phenomenon is very common in American intercollegiate alliances. Students at liberal arts colleges can cool off in the shade of a large university; through this sort of informal cooperation, they are able to make up for the limited educational resources of a liberal arts school.

Furthermore, in following with the “education without borders” principle, 30 percent of American college students are able to select an exchange program during their third year and study abroad for a semester or more. Many American colleges have begun to open centers abroad. More and more American schools are establishing alliances with other higher education establishments around the world or participating in international collegiate alliances in order to provide their students with more opportunities to study abroad.

International exchange programs became prevalent after World War II, when Europe was faced with recovering a social order, reviving the economy and reconstructing relationships between nations. Thus sending students to study and live in other countries became one of the best methods to achieve interaction and communication. Not only were students able to study the local language and culture, but also more importantly they were able to gain independence, maturity and the special global perspective necessary to become leaders.

America has 78 schools with educational establishments abroad — more than any other country in the world. But China is home to more of these international alliance educational establishments than any country save for the United Arab Emirates — China ranks second.

The author is a columnist for MyCOS


申梦晗:校际联合让美国高等教育更强
2013-05-17

美国的大学是这个国家最广受赞誉和最引人效仿的文化成就。然而,在金融危机和全球化影响日渐深刻的当下,美国高校一直在思变,试图保持在全世界高校中的领先位置。方式之一就是强化校际联合机制,即将各校的人力和教育资源有机结合,确保在逐渐失衡和承受巨大压力的高等教育体系中,获得持续发展的动力。
  美国某些学校因为有着一脉相承的宗教信仰或传统而互结联盟。它们情同手足,又各有所长。在这些校区合作中,以马萨诸塞州的五联校、加州的三联校和宾州的三校联盟最具代表性。笔者的母校布林莫尔学院就是宾州三校联盟之一。其他两所是斯沃斯莫尔学院和哈弗福德学院。这三所学校间可任意选课,甚至可去另一个学校主修专业。除了上课,学生还可共享对方的食堂和图书馆系统。
  除了学校联盟硬件上的必要互通,软件上的配合才是真正让校际联盟配合得天衣无缝的关键。学校因为师资的有限,不能同时提供所有专业需要的课程。以关系尤为紧密的哈弗福德学院和布林莫尔学院为例,经过磨合和精心计划,两校会提供对方没有的课程,比如在同一学期内,布林莫尔学院会提供微观经济课程,哈弗福德学院则提供宏观经济课程。为了两校学生互动上的方便,两所学校上下课时间会错开十分钟,同时两校之间每隔15分钟便有一趟校际班车。
  除了文理学院之间的联姻,也有文理学院和综合性大学的合作。哥伦比亚大学与巴纳德学院就是这种关系的例证。虽然它们的财政和招生相互独立,但颁发证书的时候巴纳德学院都会以哥伦比亚大学冠名。巴纳德学院的学生可以享用哥大的课程资源,借助综合大学的多专业优势,学院让对工程等学科感兴趣的人,在文理学院学习后,继续在哥大深造。这种现象在美国高校联盟中非常普遍。文理学院的学生都会积极到综合大学这棵大树下乘凉,通过这种非正式渠道的合作,弥补文理学院教育资源有限的遗憾。
  另外,遵循教育无国界的理念,30%的美国大学生在大三时会选择以交换方式到国外学习一段时间。很多美国大学都在国外开设分校,更多的美国学校则会选择同世界其他高等学府建立联盟关系,或者参加一些跨国多校联盟,为学生提供交换学习的机会。
  国际交换学习的盛行,始于二战结束后,当时的欧洲面临恢复社会秩序、重振经济和重塑各国关系的要求,互相派遣学生进入他国学习和生活成为一种最佳交流渠道。学生不仅可以学习当地语言、了解当地文化,更重要的是可以养成独立、成熟和有国际观的领袖特质。
  参与海外办学的学校中,以美国的最多,一共有78所。而在国际联合办学最多的对象国中,中国仅次于阿联酋,位列第二。(作者是麦可思专栏作家)
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Poland: Charlie Kirk’s Death Is a Warning to America

Sri Lanka: Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize Bid Paved with Gaza Corpses

Germany: Trump Wants To Shut Down the Free Press for Good*

Bangladesh: Donald Trump’s 19th Century Nationalism in a 21st Century World

Turkey: Market Access Isn’t Success: Trade Deals Won’t Save US Automakers

Topics

Bangladesh: Donald Trump’s 19th Century Nationalism in a 21st Century World

Sri Lanka: Trump’s Nobel Peace Prize Bid Paved with Gaza Corpses

Turkey: Market Access Isn’t Success: Trade Deals Won’t Save US Automakers

Poland: Charlie Kirk’s Death Is a Warning to America

Germany: Trump Wants To Shut Down the Free Press for Good*

Germany: Trump Turns the Tables

Malaysia: A Major Breakthrough of US and EU on Ukraine or Mere Rant? ASEAN Taking Notes

South Korea: Trump Halts Military Aid to Taiwan, and It Concerns Us, Too

Related Articles

Singapore: TikTok Deal Would Be a Major Win for Trump, but Not in the Way You Might Expect

Pakistan: US Debt and Global Economy

Malaysia: The Tariff Trap: Why America’s Protectionist Gambit Only Tightens China’s Grip on Global Manufacturing

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Spain: State Capitalism in the US