Hillary’s Billions

Published in Le Figaro
(France) on 25 January 2014
by Jean-Sébastien Stehli (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Laura Napoli. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
Politics is a machine that never stops running. The announcement this week that the most powerful super PAC [Editor’s note: stands for Political Action Committee] in America is organizing a campaign to support Hillary Clinton is the most striking example. Priorities USA Action has decided to support the former secretary of state to Barack Obama, two years before the 2016 election and despite the fact that Hillary has not yet publicly expressed her intention to try again for the presidency. This news is so big that it was on the front page of the New York Times last Thursday.

At the same time that it announced that it would put its enormous firepower at Hillary's service, Priorities USA Action was proceeding with an internal reorganization to place those close to Barack Obama, and those who led him to victory in 2012, in command of the super PAC. For example, Jim Messina, Obama’s campaign manager, became co-chairman of the organization.

Super PACs are relatively new types of political organizations that are not limited in the amount of money that they can raise. They do not have the right, however, to coordinate their actions with those of the candidate that they support.

Priorities USA Action is primarily interested in contributors capable of cutting checks in the six- to seven-figure range. This is the same group that largely contributed to raising $1 billion for Barack Obama in 2012.

When Priorities USA Action launched its campaign, several more modestly-sized super PACs also backed Hillary Clinton, such as Ready for Hillary, led by two former Hillary campaign workers from 2008.

Jim Messina explained that one of the priorities of his group will be micro-targeting via televised ads, a technique developed during the last campaign that allowed the group to identify voters favorable to the candidate with significant precision.


Les milliards de Hillary

La politique est une machine qui ne s'arrête jamais. Et l'annonce cette semaine que le plus puissant des Super PACs américains se mettait en ordre de bataille pour soutenir Hillary Clinton, en est l'exemple le plus frappant. Priorities USA Action a décidé de soutenir l'ex Secrétaire d'Etat de Barack Obama, deux ans avant l'élection de 2016 et alors même qu'elle n'a pas fait connaître son intention de se lancer à nouveau dans la campagne présidentielle. Cette annonce est si énorme qu'elle a occupé la une du New York Times jeudi dernier.

En même temps qu'il annonçait qu'il mettait son énorme puissance de feu au service de Hillary, Priorities USA Action procédait à une réorganisation interne qui mettait aux commandes du Super PAC des proches de Barack Obama qui avaient mené sa campagne victorieuse en 2012. Par exemple, Jim Messina, son directeur de campagne, devient le co-chairman de l'organisation.
Les Super PACs sont des organisations politiques relativement récentes qui ne sont pas limitées dans le montant des fonds qu'elles peuvent lever. Elles n'ont pas le droit de coordonner leur action avec celle du candidat qu'elles soutiennent.
Priorities USA Action s'intéresse principalement aux contributeurs capables de faire des chèques à six et surtout à sept chiffres. C'est cette machine de guerre qui a largement contribué à lever 1 milliard de dollars pour Barack Obama en 2012.
Au moment où Priorities USA Action se lance dans la campagne, tout une séries de Super PACs de taille plus modeste se rangent derrière Hillary Clinton, comme Ready For Hillary, dirigé par deux ex de la campagne de Hillary en 2008.
Jim Messina a expliqué que l'une des priorités de son groupe serait le le micro ciblage dans ses spots télévisés, une technique développée lors de la dernière campagne qui permet d'identifier avec une grande précision les électeurs favorable à son candidat.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

South Africa: Ramaphosa’s Genius Masterstroke: Roelf Meyer Is a Response to Bozell and the US Attacks

Ireland: The Audacity of Newbie Catholic JD Vance Lecturing Pope Leo Is Breathtaking

Saudi Arabia: A World without NATO… What Would It Look Like?

Germany: Would a Trump Deal Be Better Than the Obama Deal?*

Spain: Global Trumpism Is Running Out of Steam

Topics

Spain: Global Trumpism Is Running Out of Steam

Germany: Fight in Virginia: Bickering over Election Districts Undermines Democracy

Austria: Trump Made a Big Mistake by Comparing Himself to Jesus in an AI Generated Image

Canada: Americans Are Paying More Attention to Canada. Should We Worry?

South Africa: Ramaphosa’s Genius Masterstroke: Roelf Meyer Is a Response to Bozell and the US Attacks

South Africa: Trump: The Most Dangerous President in the World

Canada: Trump’s Rule-Breaking Belligerence Lowers the Bar Everywhere

Australia: Forget Trump. On AUKUS, It’s the Next President We Must Worry About

Related Articles

Saudi Arabia: A World without NATO… What Would It Look Like?

Israel: Faced with Diplomatic Impotence, War against Iran Is Legitimate

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation