‘Vintage’ Heroin

Published in El Pais
(Spain) on 9 February 2014
by Elvira Lindo (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Matt Valentine. Edited by Sean Feely.
If you avoided talking about the merits of that prodigious drug, heroin, 30 years ago, it was either because you were too young back then or you were one of those innocent souls who stayed on the right path. There was no way of escaping someone you knew telling you about the hallucinatory sensations produced by that substance, which some called “the White Horse.”

You didn't have to be among the underclasses to hear that hagiography. Sometimes it was a schoolmate who you ran into on a street corner and, as one thing led to another, you ended up going for a drink. You paid, of course, and if the conversation moved on to the subject of old times — because young people have old times too — your friend felt that it was the right time to ask to borrow some money from you. I must say that nobody has ever offered me heroin. Something in my appearance seems to cause people to not offer it to me, but yes, I was victim of being sponged off of by some people. I may have been even more of a victim when I did a friend the favor of taking a package to a friend he had in Paris, taking advantage of a trip I had to make I had told him about. I was an innocent person, but I must say that a guardian angel was watching over me the entire time, because only a guardian angel could perform the miracle of saving me from that endemic environment.

Despite having read studies and articles analyzing addiction around that time, I never heard anyone talk about heroin with as much accuracy, intensity and exaltation as those that took it. Part of the language they thought of as their own had been borrowed from the cultural romanticism surrounding those baggies; strangely, it so happened that after years of addiction, all junkies spoke the same language. A small-town junkie babbled similar words to an urban junkie. Heroin was something that unified these junkies, acting in the same way as in the minds of believers. Each person expresses themselves in their own way, but all of them say the same thing: Anyone who is not part of their religion does not experience the pure essence of life. Although it may have been difficult to explain, it was easy to feel like an idiot listening to that type of revelation.

To anyone who did not experience it, it may seem easy to not have let oneself be misled by that environment. But for those of us that lived with that dangerous distraction, the puzzle is why some of us fell into temptation and others did not. There were victims who were amazingly intelligent and others who were as dumb as a rock; some were very susceptible, but others were not at all. Perhaps what made them equals was that particular fearlessness of those people who are always the first ones to throw themselves into the deep end.

The death of the actor Phillip Seymour Hoffman this past Sunday has left us speechless; primarily because he was a special actor who was admired by the public, respected by critics, profitable for the industry and a master of something which, as noted in The New Yorker, has created a style that is different from that of Brando or Pacino. Unlike these other charismatic actors that seem to be playing themselves in each role, Hoffman had been a specialist in making himself disappear and be absorbed by the character that he was playing.

In the wake of Hoffman's seemingly unthinkable death, it has happened: The drug is once again all over the front pages of the American press. The New York Times had already warned a while ago about this revival, which had already claimed its first group of victims in rural areas. This very week, there was talk of a “generational amnesia”; those 40 years during which a sense of oblivion has been created among those who were not born to witness what was a devastated landscape.

Personally, I really hope that Hoffman's death serves as a warning, and never as an incentive, and I really hope that those of us who saw and heard about the way in which all those young people were overcome do not utter a romantic word about it. It was not the best or the most susceptible people that died, but those people that did not have the strength to battle their addiction. They were not alone: Many of them had a family who supported them as much as they could, paid for their treatment and were also victims of their lies.

Psychiatrist Dr. Lamela told me that sociologists believe there has been a romantic revival of the ‘80s, which includes heroin as a vintage object. In the ‘90s, other drugs arrived that were associated with opulence. Therefore, heroin fits better with our present state of mind. The withdrawal symptoms, the familiar damage and AIDS, which has now become a chronic illness, are still in this oblivion.

Oblivion works so much in favor of the drug's return that old perceptions are already returning: Hoffman suffered terrible loneliness after his wife asked him to stay away from the children until he was clean. Is there no journalist that remembers what it was like to have a heroin addict in the house? Is there nobody who contemplated how orphans dealt with the death of their parents due to heroin? Fortunately, in our country the return of this drug has not been received warmly, even though there is an idealization of an age which formed part of the struggles of our youth. Is it not time to grow up and tell the truth?


Heroína ‘vintage’

A raíz de la muerte de Seymour Hoffman, aquello que parecía impensable, ha sucedido: esta droga ha conquistado de nuevo la primera plana de la prensa americana

Si hace 30 años a usted no le soltaron un pequeño discurso sobre las bondades de aquella droga prodigiosa es porque, o bien no era joven en esa época, o bien era usted uno de esos seres inocentes que andan sin pisar el suelo. No había forma de librarse de que algún conocido te describiera las alucinantes sensaciones que provocaba esa sustancia a la que algunos llamaban la Reina.

No era necesario internarse en el lumpen para escuchar esa hagiografía, a veces se trataba de un compañero del colegio con el que te encontrabas en una esquina del barrio, y como una cosa lleva a la otra te tomabas una caña improvisada. Pagabas tú, por descontado, y si la conversación se prolongaba transitando por los viejos tiempos (porque la juventud también tiene viejos tiempos) tu amigo sentía que ya tenía el terreno abonado para pedirte un préstamo. Debo decir que a mí jamás nadie me ofreció heroína. Algo en mi aspecto resultaba refractario a ese ofrecimiento, pero sí fui víctima de algunos sablazos, y aún podía haber sido más víctima de haberle concedido a un amigo el favor de llevarle un paquete a un colega que tenía en París aprovechando un viaje que le conté que tenía que hacer. Yo era una inocente pero debo decir que el ángel de la guarda, porque solo el ángel de la guarda pudo obrar el milagro de salvarme de aquel ambiente pegajoso, no me dejó un momento a solas.

A pesar de haber leído estudios analizando la adicción y crónicas sobre aquellos tiempos, nunca escuché hablar sobre la heroína con tanta precisión, intensidad y arrobo como a aquellos que la consumían. Parte del lenguaje que creían propio lo habían tomado prestado del romanticismo cultural que envolvía aquellas papelinas; extrañamente ocurría que tras unos años de adicción todos los yonquis hablaban el mismo idioma, el yonqui de pueblo balbuceaba palabras parecidas a las del yonqui de barrio: la heroína actuaba como elemento aglutinador, como así actúa la fe en la mente de los creyentes. Cada cual se expresa a su manera, pero todos vienen a decir lo mismo: quien está fuera de su religión no experimenta la pura esencia de la vida. Aunque sea complicado de explicar era fácil sentirse una idiota escuchando ese tipo de revelaciones.

A quien no vivió aquel ambiente puede parecerle sencillo no haberse dejado arrastrar por él, pero el enigma para aquellos que convivimos con aquella peligrosa diversión es por qué unos cayeron en la tentación y otros no. Hubo víctimas de brillante inteligencia y víctimas sin dos dedos de frente; unos con una gran sensibilidad, otros carentes de ella. Tal vez lo que les igualaba era esa peculiar audacia de quienes siempre son los primeros en tirarse a la piscina.

La muerte el domingo pasado del actor Philip Seymour Hoffman nos ha dejado sin habla: en primer lugar, porque era un actor especial, admirado por el público, respetado por la crítica, rentable para la industria y un maestro en algo que, como señalaba la revista New Yorker, ha creado una escuela distinta de la de Brando o Pacino: al contrario que este tipo de actores tan carismáticos que parecen describirse a sí mismos en cada papel, Seymour Hoffman ha sido especialista en hacerse invisible, en aparecer fagocitado por el personaje que encarna.

A raíz de su muerte, aquello que parecía impensable, ha sucedido: la heroína ha conquistado de nuevo la primera plana en la prensa americana. The New York Times ya advirtió hace un tiempo de este revival que se ha cobrado su primer batallón de víctimas en zonas rurales. Esta misma semana se hablaba de “amnesia generacional”, esos cuarenta años que han sembrado el olvido en aquellos que no habían nacido para presenciar lo que fue un paisaje devastado.

Personalmente, deseo, con todas mis fuerzas, que la muerte de Hoffman sirva de aviso, jamás de aliciente, y que aquellos que tuvimos ojos y oídos para seguir el proceso que derrotó a toda aquella juventud no admitamos palabrería romántica al respecto. No se fueron los mejores ni los más sensibles, murieron aquellos que no tuvieron fuerzas para luchar contra su adicción. No estaban solos, muchos tenían una familia que les respaldó cuanto pudo, que pagó tratamientos y fue víctima también de sus embustes.

Me dice una psiquiatra, la doctora Lamela, que desde el punto de vista sociológico se habla de un revival romántico de los ochenta, que incluye a la heroína como un objeto vintage. En los noventa llegaron otras drogas que fueron asociadas a la opulencia. Por tanto, la heroína cuadra mejor con nuestro presente estado de ánimo. En el olvido han quedado los monos, el destrozo familiar y el sida, convertido ya en enfermedad crónica.

Tan a favor juega el olvido para favorecer una vuelta de esta droga que ya vuelven las viejas interpretaciones: Hoffman padecía una terrible soledad después de que su mujer le pidiera que se alejara de los niños hasta que estuviera limpio: ¿no hay ningún periodista que recuerde cómo era tener un heroinómano en casa?, ¿no hay nadie que contemple cómo asumieron la muerte de sus padres los huérfanos de la heroína? Por fortuna, en nuestro país no se aprecia un regreso de esta droga, aunque sí la idealización de una época en la que se enmarcan nuestras batallitas de juventud. ¿No va siendo hora de madurar y de contar la verdad?
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Germany: The Main Thing Is That the War Stops

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Germany: It’s Not Only Money That’s at Stake: It’s American Democracy

Iran: US Strategy on Iran: From Sanctions to Perception Warfare

Topics

Germany: The Main Thing Is That the War Stops

Germany: It’s Not Only Money That’s at Stake: It’s American Democracy

South Korea: Trump: ‘I’ve Never Walked into a Room So Silent Before’

Iran: US Strategy on Iran: From Sanctions to Perception Warfare

Germany: A Sensible Plan for Gaza*

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?