The Shadow of Iraq Is Problematic for Jeb Bush

Published in Il Giornale
(Italy) on 15 May 2015
by Orlando Sacchelli (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Bora Mici. Edited by Katie Marinello.
The same as my brother? No, I am not, I could not be. This is what Jeb Bush must have thought when he wound up under attack for his comment on the U.S. war in Iraq. And so, he tried to distance himself from the former president. A difficult balancing game that, if it goes forward, could create more than a few problems for him, forcing him to put energy into defending his brother's choices (or to get away from his brand, but without exaggerating) instead of explaining his own solutions for America.

It all started during a Fox News interview (See the video).

"Yes, I would have authorized the 2003 invasion," said without hesitation the former Florida governor, who is about to become a candidate (he still has not declared it officially) for the Republican primaries before the 2016 presidential election. Immediately, the Democrats launched an attack, accusing him of being like his brother, meaning a "war monger."

Now, after having explained that his position was misinterpreted, he is changing his tune. Having participated in an event in the city of Tempe, Arizona, Jeb Bush wanted to clarify his position.

"Knowing what we know now ... I would have not gone to Iraq," he said. (See the video ).

The resulting problem? It would have been very easy to get by like this. The topic is thorny, a true mine field. Jeb Bush cannot show himself to be too defeated by his brother's positions, but on the other hand, he also cannot distance himself too much as he risks alienating a large part of the electorate on the right. In sum, he needs to disentangle himself through the difficult work of a juggler, in the hopes that the subject will soon fade into the background. But for his adversaries, the opportunity was (and is) too delicious to let go of the chance to attack him. And we are not only talking about the Democrats.

New Jersey Governor Chris Christie (another potential candidate for the Republican nomination), distinguished himself from Jeb Bush, saying “I think President Bush made the best decision he could at the time, given that his intelligence community was telling him that there was WMD and that there were other threats right there in Iraq. But I don’t think you could honestly say that if we knew then that there was no WMD that the country should have gone to war.”

Even the Republican candidates for the primaries, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul and Marco Rubio wanted to clarify that the Iraq invasion would not have been ratified if they had known that the information provided by intelligence was wrong.

Meanwhile, Jeb Bush was forced to defend himself from a violent verbal attack hurled against him by a Nevada university student: "Your brother created ISIS," shouted Ivy Ziedrich in his face. And then she stayed hot on his heels, "Why are you saying that ISIS was created by us not having a presence in the Middle East when it’s pointless wars where we send young American men to die for the idea of American exceptionalism?"

Jeb Bush responded, "We respectfully disagree. We have a disagreement ... Look, you can rewrite history all you want. But the simple fact is that we are in a much more unstable place because American pulled back" (See the video).

Hillary Clinton fittingly stays to the side, preferring to avoid getting involved in the Republican row, guarding herself from touching the issue. She has only to gain from her rivals' arguments, even if, sooner or later, even the former Secretary of State will be presented with the log of her foreign policy.


Uguale a mio fratello? No, non lo sono, non posso esserlo. Deve aver pensato questo Jeb Bush dopo che è finito sotto attacco per un commento sulla guerra degli Usa in Iraq. E così ha provato a prendere le distanze dall’ex presidente. Un difficile gioco di equilibri che, se andrà avanti, potrebbe creargli non poche difficoltà, costringendolo a dedicare energie a difendere le scelte del fratello (o a smarcarsi da lui, ma senza esagerare) anziché a spiegare le proprie ricette per l’America.

Tutto è iniziato durante un’intervista a Fox News (guarda il video). “Sì, avrei autorizzato l’invasione del 2003″, ha detto senza esitazioni l’ex governatore della Florida, in procinto di candidarsi (non l’ha ancora fatto ufficialmente) per le primarie repubblicane in vista delle presidenziali del 2016. Subito i democratici sono partiti all’attacco, accusandolo di essere simile al fratello, cioè un “guerrafondaio”.

Ora, dopo aver spiegato che la sua posizione era stata fraintesa, corregge il tiro. Intervenuto ad un evento al municipio di Tempe, in Arizona, Jeb Bush ha tenuto a precisare la sua posizione: “Se avessi saputo quello che so oggi, non sarei andato in Iraq” (guarda il video). Problema risolto? Sarebbe troppo facile cavarsela così. Il tema è spinoso, un vero e proprio terreno minato. Jeb Bush non può mostrarsi troppo schiacciato sulle posizioni del fratello, ma d’altro canto non può nemmeno prenderne troppo le distanze, col rischio di inimicarsi gran parte dell’elettorato di destra. Insomma, deve districarsi nel difficile mestiere dell’equilibrista, sperando che il tema passi presto in secondo piano. Ma l’occasione, per i suoi avversari, era (ed è) troppo ghiotta per lasciarsi scappare l’opportunità di attaccarlo. E non stiamo parlando solo dei Democratici.

Il governatore del New Jersey Chris Christie (dato per potenziale candidato alla nomination repubblicana), per primo aveva marcato le distanze da Jeb Bush: “Credo che il presidente Bush abbia preso la decisione migliore, considerato ciò che la sua comunità di intelligence gli stava dicendo sulle armi di distruzione di massa”, ma “non credo si possa dire che se si fosse saputo che non c’erano il nostro Paese sarebbe dovuto andare in guerra”. Anche i candidati repubblicani alle primarie, Ted Cruz, Rand Paul e Marco Rubio, hanno tenuto a precisare che l’invasione dell’Iraq non l’avrebbero votata se avessero saputo che le informazioni fornite dall’intelligence erano sbagliate.

Intanto Jeb Bush si è trovato costretto a difendersi da un violento attacco verbale scagliato contro di lui da una studentessa universitaria del Nevada: “Suo fratello ha creato l’Isis”, gli ha urlato in faccia Ivy Ziedrich. E poi lo ha incalzato: “Perché dice che l’Isis è stato creato dalla nostra assenza in Medio Oriente quando sono invece le guerre inutili dove mandiamo giovani americani a morire per l’idea dell’eccezionalismo americano?”. Jeb Bush ha replicato: “Non siamo d’accordo, siamo in rispettoso disaccordo. Si può riscrivere la storia quanto si vuole, ma sta di fatto che ci troviamo in una situazione molto più instabile perchè l’America si è ritirata” (guarda il video).

Hillary Clinton giustamente resta in disparte, preferisce evitare di intromettersi nella bagarre repubblicana, guardandosi bene dal toccare l’argomento. Finché litigano i rivali lei ha solo da guadagnarci. Anche se, prima o poi, anche all’ex segretario di Stato verrà presentato il conto sulla politica estera.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: Maybe Trump’s Tariff Bludgeon Was Good for Something after All

Australia: Trump Often Snaps at Journalists. But His Latest Meltdown Was Different

Germany: Trump’s Selfishness

Canada: Donald Trump’s Oddities Mask a Real Threat that Lurks in Plain Sight

Austria: Deterrence, but Not for Everyone

Topics

Canada: No, Joly, We Don’t Want America’s Far-Left Academic Refugees

Germany: Trump’s Selfishness

Austria: Trump Ignores Israel’s Interests during Gulf Visit

Germany: Trump’s Offer and Trump’s Sword

Canada: A Guide To Surviving the Trump Era

Canada: Trump Prioritizes Commerce Over Shared Values in Foreign Policy Gamble

Australia: Another White House Ambush Sends a Message to World Leaders Entering Donald Trump’s Den

Related Articles

Ireland: Just like the Bush Era, the US Is Once Again Testing European Unity

India: How America’s Iraq Oil Saga Might Be Replayed in Syria

Spain: The ‘Anti-Woke’ Guru Helping Elon Musk To Make the US Efficient Again

Qatar: Trump’s Landslide Presidential Victory and the Main Causes behind It

U.K.: The Guardian View on the US Election and Women: What’s Different This Time?