Europe: Jerusalem First

Published in El País
(Spain) on 11 December 2017
by Vicente Palacio (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Isabel Álvarez. Edited by Tiana Robles.

 

The U.S. has become a major strategic risk for the European project

With the unilateral recognition of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, the United States emphasizes its strategic and even moral deterioration. However, this alleged way to accelerate the peace is not only an exercise in cynicism; it is also a caricature of “America First.” In fact, it's Israel First. In exchange for the unconditional gift to Benjamin Netanyahu, the U.S. gets nothing: no guarantee that there will be a process or that it will lead anywhere. Once more the U.S. turns its back on the United Nations and the world, exacerbating the Palestinians’ grievance, and in addition, making life more insecure.

In December 2016, Barack Obama allowed the Security Council to condemn the Israeli settlements (Resolution 2334). The greater pressure was on the stronger side because a negotiation was intended, not a surrender. But of course, Donald Trump does not know that the constructions in East Jerusalem continue; he doesn’t even seem to care much about Israel (where only Netanyahu wins with this – or his Saudi ally – whom he puts in a predicament ) nor does he seem to care much about Turkey, which is moving away from the U.S.

To ignore the European Union has become the new normal. First, the Paris climate agreement; then, the nuclear agreement with Iran. Now, a say in the peace process is stolen from Europe: First Jerusalem prevails, then some breadcrumbs from the West Bank will come, and in the end, anything. What is at stake is the so-called normative power of Europe.

If ignoring international law and foregoing consensus comes so cheaply, then what is left for us Europeans? Angela Merkel said it after the NATO Summit in May, and she probably still thinks the same: Europe can no longer rely on Washington for its safety. In fact, the U.S. has become a major strategic risk for the European project. But it is difficult for our leaders – like the strategy of the High Representative Federica Mogherini – to assume that there is a fundamental disagreement with Washington.* A healthy relationship with this administration is impossible. And the worst is yet to come: As things get complicated at home, Trump will seek to collect easy prey abroad.

The good news is that there is an opportunity. France can set the tone of the new Europe in this matter and collect the inheritance of the battered American leadership in the Middle East. The arrogance of Netanyahu in the Council of Ministers of Foreign Affairs of the European Union has led everyone to agree. Emmanuel Macron has demanded the end of the settlements; now a peace initiative inspired by the French plan of 2016 is possible. The latter has been put on ice, but it can be reactivated if the armistice between Hamas and Fatah crystallizes into a trustworthy Palestinian interlocutor. This plan would have the support of Russia, China, and the Arab countries, possibly without Washington at the outset; but the EU cannot be dragged along by its unpredictable ally. In Jerusalem, Europe's revival or its collapse is at stake.

*Editor’s note: Federica Mogherini is the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy. The High Representative is the chief coordinator and representative of the Common Foreign and Security Policy within the European Union.




Europa: Jerusalén primero

EE UU se ha convertido en un riesgo estratégico de primera magnitud para el proyecto europeo

Con el reconocimiento unilateral de Jerusalén como capital de Israel, Estados Unidos acentúa su deterioro estratégico e incluso moral. Esta supuesta vía para acelerar la paz no es solo un ejercicio de cinismo: también es una caricatura del America First. En realidad, se trata de un Israel First: a cambio del regalo incondicional a Netanyahu, EE UU no obtiene nada: ninguna garantía de que habrá un proceso y que éste conducirá a alguna parte. EE UU da la espalda otra vez a Naciones Unidas y al mundo, exacerba el agravio a los palestinos, y hace la vida más insegura.

En diciembre de 2016, Obama permitió que el Consejo de Seguridad condenase los asentamientos israelíes (Resolución 2334). La mayor presión recaía sobre el lado más fuerte porque se pretendía una negociación, no una rendición. Pero claro, Trump no sabe que continúan las construcciones en Jerusalén Este; ni siquiera parecen preocuparle mucho Israel —donde solo Netanyahu gana con esto— ni su aliado saudí —al cual pone en un aprieto— ni Turquía, que se aleja de EE UU.

El ninguneo a la Unión Europea se ha convertido en el new normal. Primero fue el acuerdo de Cambio Climático de París; luego, el acuerdo nuclear con Irán. Ahora se le hurta a Europa una voz en el proceso de paz: primero se impone Jerusalén, luego vendrán migajas de Cisjordania, y al final cualquier cosa. Lo que está en juego es el llamado poder normativo de Europa. Si saltarse el derecho internacional y los consensos sale tan barato, entonces ¿qué nos queda a los europeos? Merkel lo dijo tras la cumbre de la OTAN de mayo, y seguramente lo piensa aún: Europa ya no puede confiar en Washington para su seguridad. De hecho, EE UU se ha convertido en un riesgo estratégico de primera magnitud para el proyecto europeo. Pero a nuestros líderes —como al documento de estrategia de la Alta Representante Mogherini— les cuesta asumir que existe un desacuerdo fundamental con Washington. Que una relación sana con esta Administración es imposible. Y lo peor está por llegar: a medida que las cosas se le compliquen en casa, Trump buscará cobrarse presas fáciles en el exterior.

La buena noticia es que existe oportunidad. Francia puede fijar el tono de la nueva Europa en este asunto y recoger la herencia del maltrecho liderazgo estadounidense en Oriente Medio. La arrogancia de Netanyahu en el Consejo de Ministros de Exteriores europeo ha puesto a todos de acuerdo. Macron ha exigido el fin de los asentamientos: ahora cabe una iniciativa de paz inspirada en el plan francés de 2016. Éste está aparcado, pero puede reactivarse si el armisticio entre Hamás y Al Fatah cristaliza en un interlocutor palestino fiable. Dicho plan contaría con el apoyo de Rusia, China y los países árabes, posiblemente sin Washington al principio; pero la UE no se puede dejar arrastrar por su impredecible aliado. En Jerusalén, Europa se juega su relanzamiento o su fracaso.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Australia: What US Intelligence and Leaks Tell Us about ‘Operation Midnight Hammer’

Australia: Could Donald Trump’s Power Struggle with Federal Reserve Create Next Financial Crisis?

Argentina: Middle East: From Nuclear Agreement to Preventive Attack, Who’s in Control?

Australia: Tech Billionaires To Reap the Rewards of Trump’s Strongarm Tax Tactics

Canada: Elbows Down on the Digital Services Tax

Topics

Colombia: The Horsemen of the New Cold War

Australia: Australia Is Far from Its Own Zohran Mamdani Moment. Here’s Why

Canada: How Ottawa Gift-Wrapped our Dairy Sector for Trump

Canada: New York Swoons over an American Justin Trudeau

Germany: Europe Bending the Knee to Trump

Germany: NATO Secretary-General Showers Trump with Praise: Seems Rutte Wanted To Keep the Emperor Happy

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

China: US Visa Policy Policing Students

Related Articles

Mexico: From Ronald to Donald

Colombia: The Horsemen of the New Cold War

Canada: How Ottawa Gift-Wrapped our Dairy Sector for Trump

Germany: Europe Bending the Knee to Trump

Germany: NATO Secretary-General Showers Trump with Praise: Seems Rutte Wanted To Keep the Emperor Happy