They are the most valuable corporations in the world: Apple, Google parent Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon and Facebook. Their market value of a roughly combined $3.4 billion corresponds to Germany’s yearly economic output.
These so-called superstar corporations occupy such a dominant position in their sector that they are able to expand on the basis of their know-how and their vast capital – new competitors hardly have a chance or are bought out. In addition, they have numerous patents at their command. Both the patents and the lack of competition make it possible for them to absorb gigantic external economies. The enormous profits that this high-tech business model yields can be attained with relatively little personnel. (Amazon is only just working its way up to this condition.)
So, last year the second most valuable German corporation Siemens made a profit of about 16,000 euros per employee (approximately $19,200), Daimler of 30,000 euros (approximately $36,000), Bayer came to almost 40,000 euros (approximately $48,000) and SAP to 43,000 euros (approximately $51,600). The U.S. giants can only smile about that: Microsoft got $170,000 out of each of its employees, Alphabet yet $100,000 more. Apple came up to a figure of $390,000 and Facebook to a cool $600,000 profit per employee.
Welcome to the new world of digitalization, that shifts the distribution to the disadvantage of the employees, which is honored by the stock market and makes the owners of Apple, Alphabet and Co. into the richest people in the world.
Die wertvollsten Unternehmen der Welt machen unfassbare Gewinne. Oft zu Ungunsten der Arbeitnehmer
Sie sind die wertvollsten Unternehmen der Welt: Apple, die Google-Mutter Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon und Facebook. Ihr Börsenwert von addiert etwa 3,4 Billionen Dollar entspricht der Wirtschaftsleistung Deutschlands eines Jahres.
Diese sogenannten Superstarfirmen nehmen in ihren Sparten eine dominante Stellung ein, die sie auf Grund ihres Vorsprungs an Know-how und ihrer Kapitalgröße ausbauen können – neue Wettbewerber haben kaum eine Chance oder werden aufgekauft. Zudem verfügen sie meist über zahlreiche Patente. Beides – die Patente und fehlende Konkurrenz – ermöglicht ihnen das Abschöpfen gigantischer Zusatzerträge. Die riesigen Gewinne, die dieses High-Tech-Geschäftsmodell abwirft, lassen sich zudem mit relativ wenig Personal erzielen (wobei Amazon auf diesen Zustand erst noch hinarbeitet).
So machte vergangenes Jahr das zweitwertvollste deutsche Unternehmen Siemens einen Gewinn je Mitarbeiter von etwa 16.000 Euro, Daimler von 30.000, Bayer kam auf knapp 40.000 und SAP auf 43.000. Darüber können die US-Riesen nur lächeln: Microsoft holte aus jedem seiner Angestellten 170.000 Dollar heraus, Alphabet noch 100.000 mehr. Apple kam auf einen Wert von 390.000 und Facebook auf satte 600.000 Dollar Gewinn je Mitarbeiter.
Willkommen in der neuen Welt der Digitalisierung, die die Verteilung zu Ungunsten der Arbeitnehmer verschiebt, was die Börse honoriert und die Besitzer von Apple, Alphabet und Co. zu den reichsten Menschen der Welt macht.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
The Iranian regime remains capable of funding its power mechanisms and suppressing opposition, while the United States ... suffers from limited political space.