Donald Trump participated in the commemoration of the D-Day landing.
“Exceptional.” That’s the word Donald Trump used in Caen to describe his relationship with Emmanuel Macron, and the relationship between the U.S. and France. It was on Thursday, at the 75th anniversary of D-Day. The memory of this incredible military action and of the sacrifice of American soldiers to free Europe from the Nazis eases the tensions that today separate allies of yesterday. But the instability of this president forces us to judge his actions over his words.
The U.S. is obviously still an important ally of France. The economic exchanges between us, and close cooperation regarding safety and defense guarantee a strong relationship, inherited from the second half of the 20th century. But the world changes quickly, and so does America. With his inappropriate manners and his preference for bilateral power relations, Trump destabilizes two foundations of France in the world: Europe and multilateralism. Since he perceives the European Union as both an economic rival and a weird political concept, he threatens it with commercial war, tries to divide France and Germany, and supports the most aggressive Brexit figures in the U.K. Regarding diplomacy, he disavowed the Paris climate agreement and the Iran nuclear deal, and showed his lack of interest in the United Nations or the World Trade Organization.
Under his leadership, the U.S. does not want to play the part of world organizer anymore. It has renounced the idea of common utopia and focuses instead on its own short-term interests. With friends like that, who needs enemies.
Donald Trump a participé aux commémorations du Débarquement de Normandie
« Exceptionnelle » : c’est le terme utilisé à Caen par le président Donald Trump pour qualifier sa relation avec Emmanuel Macron et celle des États-Unis avec la France. C’était jeudi, pour le 75e anniversaire du débarquement de Normandie. La mémoire de cette offensive militaire exceptionnelle et du sacrifice des soldats américains morts pour libérer le continent européen du nazisme a la vertu d’apaiser les fractures qui peuvent diviser aujourd’hui les alliés d’hier. Mais la versatilité de ce président-là conduit à jauger ses actions plutôt que ses paroles.
Les États-Unis restent bien sûr un allié important de la France. La profondeur des échanges économiques et l’étroite coopération en matière de sécurité et de défense posent un cadre de relations solide, hérité de la seconde moitié du XXe siècle. Mais le monde change rapidement, et l’Amérique avec. Avec ses manières intempestives et son penchant pour les rapports de force bilatéraux, Donald Trump déstabilise deux socles de l’action de la France dans le monde : l’Europe et le multilatéralisme. Percevant l’Union européenne comme une rivale économique et une entité politique incongrue, il la menace de guerre commerciale, cherche à diviser la France et l’Allemagne et soutient bruyamment les brexiters les plus virulents outre-Manche. Sur la scène diplomatique, il a retiré son pays de l’accord de Paris sur le climat ou de l’accord sur le nucléaire iranien, affichant son désintérêt pour les Nations unies ou l’Organisation mondiale du commerce.
Sous sa houlette, les États-Unis ne veulent plus jouer les organisateurs du monde. Ils ont renoncé à une forme d’utopie commune et se concentrent sur la défense de leurs intérêts à court terme. Avec de tels amis, nul besoin d’ennemis.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
A summit that would normally send a reassuring message ... faces total uncertainty thanks to the weakness of the United States. The only person to blame for this is Trump.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.