The problem is that this sector has mixed with racist or extremely conservative groups to try to revive a United States that never existed, except in films, TV programs and their imagination.
To say the United States is a divided nation sounds like old news now, but it’s important to highlight the problematic moment in which it finds itself.
Just as in other countries, American conservatives hope to revive what they believe their country was — 50 or 100 years ago. They hope to rekindle old ideas or ideals they believe to be central to confronting new trends and technologies, social movements and interdependencies in a world fundamentally different from the one in which they grew up.
It’s difficult to explain the U.S. Supreme Court’s most recent decision overturning the 1973 decision that decriminalized abortion and opened the door not only to a woman’s control over her own body, but also to the concept of sexual rights. It is difficult to explain without remembering that the world's leading power has a deeply religious and conservative sector that still believes religious mandates are the only ones that matter.
The problem is that this sector has mixed with racist or extremely conservative groups to try to revive a United States that never existed, except in films, TV programs and their imagination.
It is no surprise that the states where conservatives have met with greatest success are those that formed part of the Confederacy, which, in defense of slavery, tried to secede and led to the Civil War (1861-1865).
This group, which represents approximately 30% of the population, has managed to convince at least an additional 20% that its ideas are worthy. It’s a demonstration of political ability, of a long-term strategy, as the patient installation of an overwhelmingly conservative majority on the Supreme Court demonstrated. It represents the division and weakness of the left.
In any case, it’s a new chapter in the culture clash — urban versus rural, liberal versus conservative, chauvinist versus feminist, rigid versus tolerant — in which the group appearing to have the upper hand today includes those who believe that self-reliance, limiting the rights of women and minorities and returning to the norms of the 1950s are the solution to their country's problems.
In this context, it’s hardly surprising that some would go so far as to dust off 19th century laws, such as the abortion ban that was recently reinstated in Wisconsin.
Even worse, some have started to debate the possibility that the decision may lead certain states to try to prevent their residents from traveling elsewhere for medical interventions that, like abortion, are now illegal in their home states.
Incidentally, one of the major grievances of slave owners was that slaves who escaped to the North or to Mexico were not returned.
It’s hard to evaluate the impact of this new situation, except that many believe it may lead to a backlash from the center and the left, in an effort to restore this broken equilibrium and focus on domestic issues.
Los EU, el intento de regresión
Y lo grave es que ese sector se entremezcló con grupos racistas o de extrema derecha para tratar de revivir unos Estados Unidos que nunca existieron, salvo en las pelÃculas, los programas de televisión y la imaginación
Afirmar que los Estados Unidos son una nación dividida ya suena como un tema viejo, pero nunca está de más subrayar el problemático momento en que se encuentran.
Al igual que otros paÃses, los conservadores estadounidenses desean revivir lo que creen fue su paÃs hace 50 o 100 años y revitalizar viejas ideas o ideales que creen centrales para enfrentar a nuevas tendencias y tecnologÃas, movimientos sociales e interdependencias en un mundo fundamentalmente distinto a aquel en que crecieron.
Es difÃcil explicar la más reciente decisión de la Suprema Corte de Justicia estadounidense al revocar una decisión de 1973 que despenalizó el aborto y abrió la puerta no sólo al control de la mujer sobre su cuerpo como al concepto de derechos sexuales, sin recordar que la principal potencia mundial tiene un sector tan profundamente religioso y conservador que todavÃa cree que los mandatos religiosos son los únicos válidos.
Y lo grave es que ese sector se entremezcló con grupos racistas o de extrema derecha para tratar de revivir unos Estados Unidos que nunca existieron, salvo en las pelÃculas, los programas de televisión y la imaginación.
El que ese sector, que representa alrededor de 30 por ciento de la población haya logrado convencer a por lo menos 20 por ciento más de que sus propuestas valen la pena, es una muestra de su capacidad polÃtica, de un trabajo de largo plazo –como la paciente instalación de una abrumadora mayorÃa conservadora en la Suprema Corte– y de la división e incapacidad de la izquierda.
En todo caso es un nuevo capÃtulo en un choque de culturas –urbana contra rural, liberal contra conservadora, machista contra feminista, rigidez contra tolerancia–, donde el grupo que hoy parece tener la ventaja es el de quienes creen que la autosuficiencia, la limitación de derechos a las mujeres y las minorÃas o el retorno a normas y situaciones de los años 1950 son la solución para los problemas de su paÃs.
Washington is no longer content with slow exhaustion; it has adopted a strategy of swift, symbolic strikes designed to recalibrate the international landscape.
Venezuela is likely to become another wasted crisis, resembling events that followed when the U.S. forced regime changes in Libya, Afghanistan and Iraq.
We are faced with a "scenario" in which Washington's exclusive and absolute dominance over the entire hemisphere, from Greenland and Canada in the north to the southern reaches of Argentina and Chile.