To appeal to Republicans, Biden has proposed a $13.6 billion budget to increase security on the border with Mexico.
The situation on the border between the United States and Mexico is one of the hot spots in U.S. domestic politics, as well as for the Mexican government.
The candidates for the Republican presidential nomination have made border security a priority and have raised the possibility of deploying the military, including special forces, to fight drug cartels in Mexico.
At the same time, there is a legislative fight over the budget and the military aid that President Joe Biden is seeking for Ukraine, with $61.4 billion allocated to Ukraine and $14 billion to Israel. To appeal to Republicans, Biden has requested an additional $13.6 billion to increase security on the border with Mexico. But the price the Republicans are now demanding goes far beyond spending, implying the possibility of policy change, particularly with reference to the asylum policy.
A summary of the issue shows that Republicans want the Department of Homeland Security to renew construction of the border wall in the Southwest, increase the salaries of Border Patrol agents, reform the country’s asylum laws, crack down on the humanitarian conditional release of illegal immigrants and deny asylum to immigrants who cross safe third countries before arriving in the U.S.
In an address to the nation a month ago, Biden pushed for aid to Ukraine and Israel and mentioned the border enhancement measures. In connection with this, the administration announced that it would waive more than 20 regulations to move forward with the construction of 32 kilometers (20 miles) of the planned border wall in Texas.
Biden’s request to Congress for funding includes funding for 1,300 additional Border Patrol agents and for more than 100 Non-Intrusive Inspection Systems to detect fentanyl.
For the Republicans, however, this is just the beginning. It appears that their objective is to create an image of a weak and incapable Biden by highlighting the problems at the border. The Republicans blame these problems on the Mexican drug cartels and their impact in the U.S. through deaths caused by the illegal fentanyl trade and its presumed influence on human trafficking.
Some interpret this to mean that President Biden probably will accept some changes to current asylum policies to bring them more in line with the Republicans’ more restrictive proposals. However, Republican policies focus more on the number of agents and arrests and the huge delays in processing asylum petitions.
The reality is that border security and immigration will be important issues, if not the primary issues, in the Republican primaries and during the first half of 2024, and one of the hallmarks of their U.S. presidential campaign next year.
Pero el precio que hoy demandan los republicanos va más allá de recursos e implica la posibilidad de cambios polÃticos, especÃficamente en lo que se refiere a la polÃtica de asilo.
En un discurso a la nación hace un mes, Biden abogó por la ayuda a Ucrania e Israel y mencionó el fortalecimiento de medidas fronterizas. En ese marco, su gobierno anunció que pasarÃa por alto más de 20 leyes para ir adelante con la construcción de 32 kilómetros de barreras fronterizas que ya estaban programadas en Texas.
Su solicitud de recursos al Congreso incluyó fondos para 1,300 agentes adicionales de la Patrulla Fronteriza y para más de 100 máquinas de inspección para detectar fentanilo.
De acuerdo con algunas versiones, es probable que el presidente Biden acepte algunos cambios a las actuales polÃticas de asilo, para ponerlas más a tono con las por su parte más restrictivas propuestas de los republicanos.
Sin embargo, las polÃticas de los republicanos se centran más en el número de agentes o la cantidad de arrestos que en los casos que se atienden y el considerable retraso en el procesamiento de peticionarios de asilo.
Más allá, la realidad es que la seguridad fronteriza y migración serán temas de importancia, si no los principales, en las primarias republicanas, el primer semestre de 2024, y una de sus banderas en la campaña presidencial estadounidense del próximo año.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.