Effective Weapons against Arms Sales to Taiwan

Published in Wenweipo
(Hong Kong) on 30 September 2011
by Zhang Haixiang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Yipeng Xie. Edited by Amy Wong.
Although China expressed firm opposition, the U.S. government still submitted Congressional notifications on Sept. 21 on the decision to upgrade Taiwan’s 145 F-16A/B fighter aircraft in an arms deal that includes pilot training, logistics support, and related materials totaling $5.85 billion. According to statistics, since Obama’s election in 2008, U.S. government arms sales to Taiwan have reached $12.2 billion, exceeding the total amount of arms sales to Taiwan since China and the U.S. established official diplomatic relations. Although not the main component, regular arms sales to Taiwan are considered to be part of the U.S. strategy to contain China in the Asia-Pacific region for two reasons.

The U.S. Is Concerned that the Chinese People Will Unite

First, since Ma Ying-jeou became the president of Taiwan, Taiwan has built a close trading relationship with mainland China; this has caused the U.S. to lose its confidence in Taiwan’s politics and army. Therefore, the U.S. and Japanese armies, in the last several years, have actively pushed forward plans for a military facility to enhance security in Yonaguni Island — situated only 110 kilometers away from the east coast of Taiwan. The purpose is to guard against further peaceful developments between China and Taiwan. To the U.S. and Japan, the “first island chain” which includes Taiwan, will lose its effectiveness [as a defense perimeter] if Taiwan allies itself closer to mainland China.

Second, the U.S. is most afraid of seeing Taiwan and China grow closer through their economic cooperation. Even Cai Yingwen of the Democratic Progressive Party claimed recently, while campaigning for the 2012 Taiwan presidential elections, that once DPP is in power, it will accept the reality of Taiwan’s economic ties with mainland China. This trend shocks the U.S., which has always hoped to maintain the hostile relationship between Taiwan and mainland China. Based on these two points, the U.S. has put Taiwan in a secondary position in the strategic plan to contain China.

Even though Taiwan can enhance its weapons with assistance from U.S. arms sales for a period of time, it doesn’t seem to have the ability to achieve some Taiwanese politicians’ so-called “Taiwan independence idea.” Think about this: If economic integration had not occurred between Taiwan and mainland China, and Taiwan’s economy didn’t improve as a result, who else in the Asia-Pacific region could save its economy? The U.S. couldn’t; Japan couldn’t either. If Taiwan’s economy weren’t doing well, would it have been able to buy those F-35s even if the U.S. had been glad to sell them? Besides, even though the U.S. wants to sell its advanced military technology to realize the so-called “regional military balance strategy,” once China follows its plan to develop its own military power, it can still dominate in the Asia-Pacific region, no matter how advanced the weapons the U.S. sells in the region.

China’s Effective Defense Strategies

Facts tells us that no matter how China expresses to the U.S. its willingness to improve the Sino-U.S. relationship, the U.S. will still undermine the China-Taiwan relationship through regular arms sales to Taiwan. Furthermore, the U.S. already knows what China’s reactions will be to these arms sales, so China must seize the initiative on this issue.

Other than terminating Sino-U.S. military exchanges, there are at least two other effective strategies. First, China should develop deeper economic and business ties between itself and Taiwan. The most effective strategy would be to ensure that Taiwan benefits from the development of the industrial division of labor in the region, which also would be a useful strategy for China to survive the economic crisis.

Second, since the U.S. uses regular arms sales to Taiwan as a strategic policy to contain China, each time it does so, China can retaliate on the basis of international law and support the U.S.’ sensitive rivals with cheap “Made-in-China” weapons or related technology. This strategy could not only curb the U.S. strategy to undermine the relationship between mainland China and Taiwan through these regular arms sales, but also warn the U.S. of the heavy price it will pay for meddling with China.


 儘管中國表達了堅決反對,美國政府仍然在9月21日通知國會,決定為台灣的145架F16A及B型戰機進行升級,這項軍售包括機師訓練和相關零部件的後勤支援,總值達到58.52億美元。據統計,自2008年8月奧巴馬當選總統以來,美國政府「對台軍售」總額已經達到122億美元,超過中美建交後歷屆美國政府的「對台軍售」總額。美國定期「對台軍售」是美方在亞太區內遏制中國戰略部署的一部分,但卻不是主要的組成部分,其中原因主要有二。
美國害怕「中國人走在一起」
 首先,自馬英九當上台灣領導人以來,兩岸經貿關係的緊密互動,已使美方對台灣的政治和軍事信心逐漸消失。因此美日軍方在過去幾年間,積極加強距離台灣東岸110公里的「與那國島」軍事設施的前沿部署,目的就是為了兩岸和平發展進一步推進時設下的「反制預案」。對美日而言,台灣向大陸方向靠攏的情況一旦出現,那就意味著以台灣為組成部分的「第一島鏈」對華封閉線將會失效。
 其次,美國最擔心的是看見兩岸由於經貿互動所帶來的進一步融合。就算民進黨的蔡英文近期為2012年台灣領導人選舉造勢時,仍然聲稱一旦民進黨重新執政,民進黨亦會接受經濟上與大陸保持互動的現實,這個趨勢對於美國一向希望看到海峽兩岸「劍拔弩張」的心態是一大打擊。就是基於上述兩點,美國已經將台灣作為遏制中國的戰略部署放在一個較次要的位置。
 台灣能夠在某一個時期獲得美方軍售,提升部分武器的性能,也不見得她就有能力實現某些台灣政客所謂的「台獨構想」。試想台灣的經濟若沒有和大陸融合而得到改善,台灣的經濟在亞太區內誰可救得了?美國不行,日本更是自顧不暇。如果台灣經濟搞不好,就算美國願意對台出售F35戰機,台灣能買得起嗎?其次,美國要出售自己較先進的軍備從而實現所謂的「地區軍事平衡戰略」,但只要中國按照自身的計劃繼續進行軍事建設,哪怕美國再往亞太地區出售更先進的武器,基於「地緣政治」制約的效應,中國仍然是能夠在亞太區內「任爾東西南北風,我自巋然不動」。
中國的有效反制手段
 事實告訴我們,無論中國如何對美方釋出改善中美關係的誠意,美方仍然是會以定期「對台軍售」作為破壞兩岸關係的手段;美方並且已經事前判斷一旦「對台軍售」時中國可能作出何種反應,因此中國必須在應對美方「對台軍售」的問題上搶佔主動地位。
 除了凍結中美兩國的軍方交流外,中國其他有效的反制手段起碼有二。首先,堅定不移地推動兩岸經貿互惠關係向更深的層次發展;因應地區產業分工發展的角度確保台灣人民從中得益,是反制美方採取任何分化措施最有效的根本戰略,亦是中國能而美國在當前經濟形勢有所不能的有效反制手段。
 其次,既然美國以「對台軍售」作為遏制中國戰略部署的一個「定期操作」,中國何妨也「以牙還牙」,在符合「國際法」的基礎上,針對美國的周邊和「敏感對手」,推銷價廉物美的「中國製造」武器或相關技術,作為美國每次「對台軍售」的有效回應。此舉不但有效遏制美方以定期「對台軍售」的手段來破壞兩岸關係,同時亦將有助於讓美方重新評估,在我周邊地區「攪局」而須付出的「沉重代價」。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Topics

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Related Articles

Hong Kong: Foreign Media Warn US Brand Reputation Veering toward ‘Collapse’ under Trump Policy Impact

Hong Kong: The Lessons of World War II: The Real World Importance of Resisting Hegemony

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Hong Kong: What Makes US Trade War More Dangerous than 2008 Crisis: Trump

Hong Kong: China, Japan, South Korea Pave Way for Summit Talks; Liu Teng-Chung: Responding to Trump