Following the costly recognition that Senator Clinton has lost the primaries, comes the moment of analyzing what happened; the one who started out with the advantage lost to a young unknown who only arrived at the Senate two years ago - of which time he has dedicated the major part to the presidential campaign. One of Obama’s advisors has explained it with dazzling clarity. Clinton articulated her discourse with professionalism, analyzing concrete problems and proposing alternatives. On the contrary, Obama addressed the heart of the people, gave wings to their illusions, and made them believe that another America is possible. Americans want to dream and Clinton’s realism does not satisfy them.
Obama has an undisputed oratoral capacity and has no problem saying to everyone what they want to hear. He does not have scruples. He is aware that American society is tired of the various military campaigns and the intense ideological debate of these past years and believes that he can seduce them with emotional discourse and breaking the barriers that have divided the Republicans and the Democrats.
McCain has before him a complex challenge. It is not clear that the conservatives will vote for him in a block. His anthropological realism goes against popular belief and his oration is demonstrably improved. In his favor, he has the rejection of Obama by certain determined Democratic sectors, like laborers, agriculture workers, and the elderly, who do not completely believe in the Senator from Illinois.
But the key shall be McCain's capacity to put an end to the enchantment. To encourage the people to analyze Obama’s concrete proposals, and above all his problematic biography. Until that moment his formidable charisma superimposes worrisome acts that for anyone else would have already cost his career. His verbal missteps—he proposed attacking Pakistan, made reference to Afghanistan as an Arab speaking country—are continuous and manifest his inexperience.
Americans want to change and have before them a young and eloquent man that assures them that it is possible.
Tras el costoso reconocimiento de que la senadora Clinton ha perdido las primarias, llega el momento de analizar qué paso, cómo quien salió con cuerpos de ventaja perdió ante un joven desconocido que apenas lleva en el Senado dos años, de los que ha dedicado la mayor parte del tiempo a la campaña presidencial. Uno de los asesores de Obama lo ha explicado con meridiana claridad. Clinton planteó su discurso desde la profesionalidad, analizando problemas concretos y proponiendo alternativas. Por el contrario Obama se dirigió al corazón de la gente, dio alas a sus ilusiones, les hizo creer que otra América es posible. Los americanos quieren soñar y el realismo de Clinton no les satisface.
Obama tiene una indiscutible capacidad oratoria y no tiene ningún inconveniente en decir a cada cual aquello que quiere escuchar. Lo suyo no son los escrúpulos. Es consciente de que la sociedad norteamericana está cansada de las distintas campañas militares y del intenso debate ideológico de estos últimos años y cree que puede seducirla con su discurso emotivo, rompiendo las barreras que han dividido a republicanos y demócratas.
McCain tiene ante sí un reto complejo. No está claro que los conservadores le voten en bloque. Su realismo antropológico va en contra de la corriente y su oratoria es manifiestamente mejorable. A su favor tiene el rechazo a Obama de determinados sectores demócratas, como obreros, agricultores y ancianos, que no acaban de creer en el senador por Illinois.
Pero la clave estará en su capacidad para acabar con el encantamiento, forzando a la gente a analizar las propuestas concretas de Obama y, sobre todo, su problemática biografía. Hasta el momento su formidable carisma se sobrepone a hechos preocupantes que a cualquier otro ya le habrían costado la carrera. Sus meteduras de pata -propuso atacar Pakistán, hizo referencia a Afganistán como país de lengua árabe...- son continuas y ponen de manifiesto su inexperiencia.
Estados Unidos quiere cambiar y tiene ante sí a un hombre joven y elocuente que le asegura que es posible.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.
It wouldn’t have cost Trump anything to show a clear intent to deter in a strategically crucial moment; it wouldn’t even have undermined his efforts in Ukraine.