After much pondering, Romney has selected his running mate in the presidential race. His vice presidential candidate is a Republican congressman named Paul Ryan. For the vast majority of Spaniards, the name Ryan means nothing, except that it reminds one of the title of a famous war movie or the name of the American-Irish gentleman who stirred things up for poor Farrah Fawcett. Nevertheless, for Americans, Paul Ryan is very well-known because he chairs the Congressional Budget Committee and because he has proven to be a true bulldog, sinking his teeth into the economic shins of the incumbent, President Obama. Indeed, this is the Paul Ryan's great strength — and his great weakness. Although the Republican vice presidential candidate is a man of ideas that in Spain are qualified as conservative — against abortion and same-sex marriage — but which in the U.S. are majority opinions, the key to his appointment has been above all to maintain a tight position of economic liberalism. In fact, in Spain his positions would not manage to be endorsed by Esperanza Aguierre and Jimenez Losantos combined. The book Ryan keeps by his bedside is Ayn Rand's “Atlas Shrugged,” and he often gives it to people as a handbook for political life. In other words, although Ryan is a Catholic, professional Spanish Catholics would throw him into the flames of hell because he is still farther away from the Vatican's social doctrine than a socialist, and this is the key. The majority of Americans are sick of paying taxes to a government that they consider elephantine. One might object that this is also a Spanish trend and that more and more taxes are being paid in Spain, but for the people of Nebraska, Florida or Illinois, what is happening in Spain doesn't make any difference, unless it is also happening to them. Of course, they don't want to pay so many taxes, but they want cuts to affect politicians and not programs like Medicare, a medical service for adults over 60 that covers millions of people. This is where Ryan can cause a lot of damage to the Republican Party because his plans are going for cuts to Medicare, while at the same time defending tax cuts for the wealthiest Americans, which reminds one of Felipe Gonzalez’ famous SICAV — variable capital investment company — created so that the rich hardly pay any taxes.* If Romney continues moderating Ryan's dialogue and saves the sick and the elderly from Ryan's budget cuts, he might have a chance at winning. If, on the other hand, Ryan continues to preach about how he is going to scalp the U.S. health care system, Obama will enjoy a second term.
*Translator’s note: In Spanish, SICAV stands for sociedad de inversión de capital variable. The reference to SICAVs in the article is because in Spain, SICAVs enjoy significant tax benefits, paying only about 1 percent in corporate income tax if they fulfill the requirements.
Un político llamado Ryan por César Vidal
Tras mucho darle vueltas, Romney ha designado a su compañero en el ticket para la Casa Blanca. Su vicepresidente es un congresista republicano llamado Paul Ryan. Para la inmensa mayoría de los españoles, el nombre de Ryan no dice nada, salvo que recuerda el título de una conocida película bélica o el nombre del americano-irlandés que atizaba hasta encenderle el pelo lumbre a la pobre Farrah Fawcett. Para los norteamericanos, sin embargo, Paul Ryan es muy conocido porque preside la comisión de presupuestos del Congreso y porque se ha manifestado como un verdadero lebrel a la hora de morderle las canillas económicas al actual presidente Obama. A decir verdad, ésa es la enorme fuerza – y la inmensa debilidad– de Paul Ryan. Aunque el candidato republicano a vicepresidente es un hombre de ideas que en España se calificarían de conservadoras –contrario al aborto y al matrimonio entre personas del mismo sexo– pero que en los Estados Unidos son mayoritarias, la clave para su designación ha sido por encima de todo que mantiene una posición económica de férreo liberalismo. A decir verdad, en España sus posiciones no llegarían a ser asumidas ni por Esperanza Aguirre y Jiménez Losantos combinados. De hecho, Ryan tiene como libro de cabecera el Atlas Shrugged de Ayn Rand y acostumbra a regalárselo a la gente cercana como vademécum para la vida política. En otras palabras, aunque Ryan es católico, los católicos profesionales españoles lo arrojarían a las llamas del infierno porque anda todavía más lejos de la doctrina social del Vaticano que un socialista. Y ahí está la clave. La mayoría de los norteamericanos está harta de pagar impuestos para un estado que consideran elefantiásico. Se puede objetar que más lo es el español y que más impuestos se pagan en España, pero para las gentes de Nebraska, Florida o Illinois lo que pasa en España –salvo para que no les suceda a ellas– les importa un pito. Ciertamente, no quieren pagar tantos impuestos, pero desean que los recortes afecten a los políticos y no a partidas como la destinada al Medicare, un servicio médico para los mayores de sesenta que cubre a millones de personas. Ahí es donde Ryan puede causar no poco daño a los republicanos porque sus planes de recorte se llevan por delante incluso el Medicare y, a la vez, defienden exenciones de impuestos para los más acaudalados que recuerdan las famosas SICAV de Felipe González, creadas para que los ricos no paguen apenas impuestos. Si Romney consigue moderar el discurso de Ryan y salvar de sus planes a los ancianos y los enfermos, puede tener posibilidades de ganar. Si, por el contrario, Ryan sigue empeñado en predicar cómo va a mondar un sistema sanitario como el americano, Obama disfrutará de un segundo mandato presidencial.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,
The economic liberalism that the world took for granted has given way to the White House’s attempt to gain sectarian control over institutions, as well as government intervention into private companies,