Uniformed Equality

Published in Frankfurter Rundschau
(Germany) on 25 January 2013
by Damir Fras (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
That's how quickly it can sometimes happen: At week's beginning, Obama announced in a speech that he would be doing more to level the occupational playing field for women during his second term. Now, the departing secretary of defense did his part to realize that intention for the military: Women will henceforth be allowed to serve in combat units.

The bizarre sexual inequality in the U.S. armed services appears to be nearing its end. While women had previously been allowed to serve in combat zones, they didn't enjoy the same opportunities for promotion and higher pay as their male counterparts because they could not get the combat experience required by a 1994 regulation.

Now the U.S. military — better late than never — has finally understood that women can no longer be excluded based on arguments that have long since been proven obsolete. Women already serve in the Army now, and there has been no decline in morale among male soldiers as had been predicted. Neither will anything change in that regard when women finally start serving in combat units. The basics are simple: Female soldiers must have the same opportunities as their male counterparts because they will be sharing the same risks.


Gleichheit in Uniform
Von Damir Fras
25. Januar 2013


So schnell kann es mitunter gehen: Anfang der Woche hat Barack Obama in einer Rede angekündigt, in seiner zweiten Amtszeit als US-Präsident mehr für die Chancengleichheit von Frauen und Männern machen zu wollen. Nun hat der scheidende US-Verteidigungsminister Leon Panetta seinen Teil dazu beigetragen, dass das Versprechen wahr werden könnte. Frauen sollen künftig auch in Kampfeinheiten des US-Militärs eingesetzt werden, hat Panetta beschlossen.

Das Ende einer bizarr anmutenden Ungleichbehandlung in den US-Streitkräften scheint nahe zu sein. Die Soldatinnen durften bisher zwar in den Krieg ziehen, doch haben sie bei weitem nicht die Chancen ihrer männlichen Kollegen, befördert zu werden und mehr Geld zu verdienen. Weil ihnen die Kampferfahrung fehlt, die sie laut einer Vorschrift aus dem Jahr 1994 gar nicht erwerben können.

Nun hat das US-Militär – spät, aber immerhin – begriffen, dass sich der Ausschluss von Frauen nicht mehr mit Argumenten begründen lässt, die aus der Zeit gefallen sind. Schon heute dienen Frauen in der Armee, und die Moral der Männer hat deswegen nicht gelitten. Daran wird sich auch nichts ändern, wenn Frauen demnächst in Kampfeinsätzen mitmachen. Im Grunde ist es simpel: Frauen in Uniform müssen die gleichen Chancen haben wie Männer. Denn sie gehen das gleiche Risiko ein.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Germany: A Sensible Plan for Gaza*

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Iran: US Strategy on Iran: From Sanctions to Perception Warfare

Topics

South Korea: Trump: ‘I’ve Never Walked into a Room So Silent Before’

Iran: US Strategy on Iran: From Sanctions to Perception Warfare

Germany: A Sensible Plan for Gaza*

Germany: Trump’s Peace Plan: Too Good To Be True

Mexico: The Kirk Paradox

Turkey: Cost of Trumping in the 21st Century: Tested in Europe, Isolated on Gaza

Austria: The Showdown in Washington Is about More Than the Budget

Singapore: Trump’s Gaza Peace Plan – Some Cause for Optimism, but Will It Be Enough?

Related Articles

Germany: Donald Trump vs. James Comey: A Legal Vendetta

Germany: Unfortunately, Reality Comes to Those Who Wait

Germany: A Software for Authoritarian Restructuring

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Germany: Can Donald Trump Be Convinced To Remain Engaged in Europe?

Previous article
Next article