The Legalization of Vigilante Justice

Published in Tagblatt
(Luxembourg) on 16 July 2013
by Damien Valvasori (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sean Thacker. Edited by Gillian Palmer.
An unarmed black teenager was shot in a “white district” because he seemed suspicious to a member of a vigilante group.

Apparently [such actions are] legal in the U.S., as the case of the killed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin and the neighborhood watchman George Zimmerman shows. The latter was acquitted by a grand jury in Florida. As opposed to the shooter, the jury was not necessarily racist in its decision; it just adhered to the “Stand your Ground” law. This law allows U.S. citizens to use deadly violence without punishment if they feel threatened.* Additionally, the burden of proof is being reversed. The shooter does not have to prove that he had no choice but to shoot in order to save his life; rather, the accusers must establish that the shooter had no reason to feel threatened. Because Trayvon Martin can no longer testify, it is hardly possible to prove that Zimmerman had no reason to feel threatened.

The Stand your Ground law opens the floodgates for vigilante justice and plays right into the hands of racist gun fanatics and wannabe police officers. As long as this law remains in force, Trayvon Martin will not be the last victim of this kind.

*Editor’s Note: “Stand your Ground” laws exist in many, but not all, U.S. states.


Legalisierung der Selbstjustiz

Ein schwarzer unbewaffneter Teenager wird in einem „Weißen-Viertel“ erschossen, weil er einem Mitglied der Bürgerwehr verdächtig vorkam.

In den USA offenbar legal, wie der Fall des getöteten 17-jährigen Trayvon Martin und des Nachbarschaftswächters George Zimmerman zeigt. Letzterer wurde nämlich vom Geschworenengericht in Florida freigesprochen.

Die Jury hat allerdings im Gegensatz zum Todesschützen Zimmerman nicht zwangsläufig rassistisch gehandelt, sondern sich einfach an das „Stand your Ground“-Gesetz gehalten. Dieses Gesetz erlaubt es den US-Bürgern, ungestraft tödliche Gewalt anzuwenden, wenn sie sich bedroht fühlen. Zusätzlich wird die Beweislast einfach umgedreht. Nicht der Schütze muss beweisen, dass ihm keine andere Möglichkeit als zu töten blieb, um sein Leben zu retten, sondern die Anklage muss nachweisen, dass der Todesschütze keinen Grund hatte, sich bedroht zu fühlen. Da Trayvon Martin nicht mehr aussagen kann, ist es kaum möglich zu beweisen, dass Zimmerman keinen Grund hatte, sich bedroht zu fühlen.

Das „Stand your Ground“-Gesetz öffnet der Selbstjustiz Tür und Tor, spielt rassistischen Waffennarren und Möchtegernpolizisten in die Hände. Solange dieses Gesetz bestehen bleibt, wird Trayvon Martin nicht das letzte Opfer dieser Art bleiben.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Topics

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Related Articles

Luxembourg: Europe Won’t Get the Better of Trump with Counter Tariffs—The Currency Is Trust

Luxembourg: The EU Needs To Step Up: Trump Should Not Be Left Alone with Putin

Luxembourg: Alone from Here: Of the Trans-Atlantic West, Only Europe Remains

Luxembourg: After Trump’s Conversation with Putin, Ukraine Comes Closer to a Dictated Peace*

Luxembourg: America Is on the Wrong Path — Even Europe Will Be Lucky To Survive Trump