Edward Kennedy, who died last August, was the patriarch of the most emblematic clan of the North American political left. The Kennedys gave all their support to Barack Obama, not because they had a special relationship with him, but because they knew that if the candidate in 2008 was Hillary Clinton, a new Democratic dynasty would have been set in the national scene that would have occupied the White House twice in two decades, much more than what the Kennedys were able to do.
Today, the first anniversary of Obama’s arrival to the office of president, the result will be known of the partial election in Massachusetts to complete Sen. Kennedy’s term. Few seats have been more secure among the 60 Democrats of the Senate. The Republicans have not occupied it for 57 years, and since then it has been the private property of the Kennedys. Such a significant seat has been the object of a tenacious fight, the result of which was unknown at the time this column was written. But it has forced President Obama to employ himself fully. Last weekend, when he should have been savoring the pleasures of his first year as president, Obama had to dedicate himself to the campaign in Boston in the fear that the majority of 60 seats that had allowed him to escape any attempt to block his agenda in the Senate would evaporate. The Senate majority leadership already studied contingency plans in order to impede the Republicans, so that even if they won yesterday in Massachusetts, they would not be able to block the health care reforms – for example, approving it in the next two weeks before the new senator takes his seat. Nice form, with respect to the public will.
In one year, Obama has gone from seeming like a messiah to having problems saving Kennedy’s seat. And if, when he reads this, it has been lost, “Houston, they have a problem.”
Edward Kennedy, muerto el pasado mes de agosto, era el patriarca del clan más emblemático de la izquierda de salón norteamericana. Los Kennedy dieron todo su apoyo a Barack Obama, no porque tuvieran especial sintonía con él, sino porque sabían que si el candidato demócrata en 2008 era Hillary Clinton, se habría asentado en la escena nacional una nueva dinastía demócrata que hubiera ocupado la Casa Blanca por dos veces en dos décadas, mucho más de lo que los Kennedy pudieron hacer nunca.
Hoy, primer aniversario de la llegada de Obama al cargo de presidente, se conoce el resultado de la elección parcial en Massachusetts para completar el mandato del senador Kennedy. Pocos escaños estaban más seguros entre los 60 demócratas de la Cámara Alta. Los republicanos no lo ocupaban desde hace 57 años y desde entonces es coto privado de los Kennedy. Pues tan significativo escaño ha sido objeto de una tenaz lucha cuyo resultado era desconocido a la hora de escribir esta columna. Pero que ha forzado al presidente Obama a emplearse a fondo. El pasado fin de semana en el que debía saborear los placeres del primer año en el cargo, Obama tuvo que dedicarlo a hacer campaña en Boston ante el temor de que la mayoría de 60 escaños que le permite escapar a cualquier intento de bloqueo en el Senado se le podía evaporar. Y la dirección de la mayoría en el Senado ya estudiaba planes de contingencia para impedir que aunque los republicanos ganaran ayer en Massachusetts pudieran bloquear la reforma sanitaria -por ejemplo aprobándola en las próximas dos semanas, antes de que el nuevo senador ocupe su escaño. Bonita forma de respetar la voluntad popular.
En un año, Obama pasa de parecer un mesías a tener problemas para salvar el escaño de Kennedy. Y si cuando lean esto, lo ha perdido, «Houston, tienen un problema».
HORIZONTE
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
Mamdani's socialists are not embarrassed when his election is celebrated with swastikas on synagogues, and Jean-Luc Mélenchon's socialists in France lean on Muslim antisemitism.