Storm Commentary: The Impact on Taiwan of Trump’s New Global Trade Norms

Published in The Storm Media
(Taiwan) on 9 August 2025
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Matthew McKay. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
On Aug. 7, Donald Trump’s “reciprocal tariffs” on countries around the world came into immediate effect. This marked the official implementation of the new global trade order under Trump’s rule, which is glaringly disadvantageous to Taiwan. Taiwan must stay alert and move swiftly to prepare its response.

Trump announced the high reciprocal tariffs on most countries on April 2 as part of an effort to pressure governments into offering favorable terms to the United States in exchange for lower tariffs. They faced several delays before finally being implemented, and even as a small number of countries (China, Taiwan and even India) continue to negotiate with the U.S. or see their tariff rates remain subject to change, Trump’s approach and the resulting shift in global trade norms have now become firmly established.

Compared with the China‑focused trade war of his first term, Trump’s latest trade offensive is far more aggressive, this time targeting countries across the globe and marked by several notable tactics and features.

One notable aspect is Trump’s approach of complete and utter unilateralism. He operates entirely outside the frameworks of the past, within which major trade rules and tariff rates were hammered out through multilateral discussions and negotiations among countries. Even what he calls “agreements” with other nations are, in reality, arrangements Washington can dictate and alter unilaterally.

Another key feature is that tariffs and trade negotiations are no longer solely about rates and market access terms. Instead, they have become an all-purpose bargaining tool: Everything from government procurement and investment to defense spending to a rival nation’s judicial system or willingness to enforce U.S. sanctions can now serve as grounds for raising tariffs.

A further element involves the abandonment of free trade and low — even zero — tariffs as the default model and cornerstone of global commerce. At the very least, the world’s largest economy has turned away from them, and it remains uncertain whether others will follow.

Moreover, in the roughly 80 years since the post-war era, the global trading system has upheld the principle of “helping the weak and aiding the needy.” During this time, advanced economies have granted developing countries preferential market access; for example, allowing them to sell goods at lower tariffs into rich markets while retaining higher tariffs on imports from those same advanced economies. That principle, evident in past World Trade Organization negotiations, has now been discarded. Trump, for instance, has imposed tariffs of around 19% on goods from far less developed Southeast Asian nations such as Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand, while demanding they levy zero tariffs on American products.

Finally, the WTO has become an even more diminished and hollowed-out institution. During Trump’s first term, Washington largely sidelined the WTO and ignored its role altogether, although other countries continued to treat it as relevant and pursued disputes through its mechanisms. Under Joe Biden, the institution was neither revitalized nor openly undermined. Now, its marginalization is expected to deepen.

But in the tariff war presently sweeping across countries worldwide, the WTO has completely lost its role as the global rule-maker and arbiter of trade. Now, it bears a closer resemblance to an economic think tank or even a mere bystander, occasionally commenting on the risks that tariff disputes pose to the global economy but lacking any real influence to address the turmoil. Countries no longer see “appealing to the WTO” as a solution; instead, bending the knee to Washington has become the way to resolve issues. The WTO’s transformation into an “invisible man” is complete, leaving its future bleak and uncertain.

Trump’s trampling over existing trade norms like a bull in a china shop is tantamount to a “reshaping” of the entire international trade framework, though the full extent of the impact remains to be seen. As the world’s largest economy and sole superpower, the U.S. has torn a gaping hole in the long-established global trade system and its rules, to widespread and profound effect. One need only look at how nearly every country in the world has spent the past six months scrambling to respond to Trump’s tariff war.

At this stage, most countries apart from the U.S. are still adhering to the established trade rules and frameworks. Trade among them continues to operate under WTO norms, to the extent possible, and the principles of free trade and low tariffs have not been abandoned. The ongoing creation of regional free-trade organizations testifies to this, and major economies such as the EU, China and Japan continue to stress openness and free trade.

However, if these norms are gradually abandoned — especially if major powers use the resulting vacuum to bully smaller and weaker nations — global trade will enter a total law-of-the-jungle era. Previous norms will no longer apply, just as no previous economic and trade norms apply to Trump.

For most Taiwanese, the tariffs imposed by the U.S. on Taiwan are the primary concern, along with how much Taiwan will be squeezed financially. However, the impact of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs is far more profound, and their long-term effects are even more devastating.

The WTO’s multilateral and free trade rules are extremely important to Taiwan’s exports and overall economy, given the latter’s status as an export-oriented economy with limited diplomatic leverage. Taiwan lacks the protection of numerous free trade agreements and participation in regional economic and trade organizations, so the WTO itself and the duty-free provisions of its Information Technology Agreement remain Taiwan’s best defense. The Section 232* investigations targeting semiconductors, pharmaceuticals and other sectors are the prelude to destroying Taiwan’s International Trade Administration protection, as zero tariffs for these products will no longer be possible.

However, with the WTO marginalized and hollowed out and even the duty-free provisions of the ITA now undermined by Trump, Taiwan’s key protection has been dismantled, significantly increasing the risks for the future. If other countries were to follow suit, it would be highly disadvantageous for Taiwan. This is therefore a point of particular concern and vigilance for Taiwan as it faces up to the new global trade norms under Trump’s rule.

*Editor’s note: Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 allows the U.S. president to adjust imports deemed to pose a threat to national security.




風評:川普治下全球貿易新規範正式生效對台灣的衝擊

2025-08-09 07:10
主筆室

8月7日起,川普對全球各國的「對等關稅」生效上路、不再延後;這代表的是「川普治下」的全球貿易新規範正式生效,而這個新規範明顯對台灣不利,台灣要警惕並提早作好因應措施。

川普在4月2日公布對等關稅,對大部份國家課以高關稅,藉此壓迫各國政府與美國談判,提出優厚的條件以取得較低的關稅。期間經過幾次暫緩與延期,8月7日起不再延期、開始生效上路。雖然還有少數國家,如中國、台灣、甚至印度等仍與美國繼續談判中、或是說關稅仍可能再改變,但川普的作法、及其可能帶來的全球經貿規範的改變已是大勢底定。

相較首任時的對中國貿易戰,川普這次面對的全球所有國家,手段也更激烈,有幾個重要的作法與特色:

一、百分之百的單邊主義。相較於過去主要與重要的經貿規範、各國間的關稅稅率,都是透過各國一起討論、協商決定的多邊主義,川普徹頭徹尾的單邊主義,甚至他口中所謂的與某國達成的協議,內容也是可由美國片面、直接就決定。

二、關稅與貿易談判不再單純,而是必須附加許多其它條件;換句話說,傳統上關稅談判中的以稅率高低、准入條件等為主,川普一口氣把它「拓展」成「萬物皆可聯結到關稅」,從採購到投資再到軍費、甚至對手國的司法、是否服從美國的制裁政策等,都能成為提高關稅的理由。

三、曾被奉為全球貿易基石的自由貿易與低關稅(甚至零關稅)不再是唯一「標準款」,或是至少已被全球最大經濟體揚棄,是否會有連鎖效應待觀察。

四、從戰後至今80年,全球貿易體系「濟弱扶傾」的思維完全被抛棄。過去先進國家多會願意給開發中國家、落後地區較優惠的貿易條件,例如讓這些國家以較低關係把商品賣進先進國家市場,落後國家也能對先進國的商品進口設立較高的關稅,這種基本原則在WTO的談判中就可看出。但川普完全推翻這個原則,例如美國對開發程度遠不如美國的東南亞國家(印尼、菲律賓、泰國等等)課19%左右的高關稅,卻要求這些國家給美國商品零關稅。

五、WTO(世貿組織)的失能與「虛化」更形嚴重。在川普1.0時代,就已把WTO「晾在一旁」、毫不理會了,但當時至少美國之外的所有國家,還把WTO當一回事,碰到爭議與問題還會想到「上訴WTO」,到拜登時期雖未恢復WTO的成佛但也未再給WTO「難看」。

但這次橫掃所有國家的關稅戰,WTO已完全失去全球經貿規則制定者與裁決者的樣子,比較像一個經濟智庫、甚至如路人甲乙,三不五時談一下關稅戰對全球經濟帶來的風險等問題,對關稅紛擾毫無著力點。各國也不再把「上訴WTO」當成一個答案,前往華盛頓朝拜才是解決問題之道,WTO成為徹頭徹尾的隱形人,未來前景不樂觀讓人擔心。

川普如進到房間的大象一樣的破壞現有經貿規範,這個破壞本身就有如「重塑」一套國際經貿規範,到底這個影響多深遠尚待觀察;作為全球最大經濟體與唯一霸權,美國的作法當然讓原來已行之多年的全球經貿體系與規範「破一個大洞」,影響與衝擊廣泛又鉅大,只要看看近半年幾乎全球所有國家都忙著應對川普的關稅戰就知道了。

現階段除了美國之外的大部份國家,仍維持著原有的經貿規範與體系,彼此之間的貿易再來仍儘量在WTO規範下運行,自由貿易、低關稅法則仍未被抛棄,這從陸續仍有自由貿易區域經貿組織產生即可知;歐盟、中國、日本等主要大型經濟體,仍強調開放與自由貿易。

但如果這套規範也逐漸被接受,特別是大國以此規範霸凌小國弱國,則全球經貿將進入完全的叢林法則時代,過去的一切規範都不再適用,就如過去所有的經貿規範都不適用在川普身上一樣。

對大部份國人而言,最關切及有感者主要是美國給台灣的關稅、及到底會壓榨台灣出資多少,但實際上川普操作對等關稅的影響,絕對不僅於此,它的長效影響才是更致命的。

作為一個出口導向、同時在國際外交上難有作為的經濟體,WTO的多邊與自由貿易規範,對台灣的出口與經濟有極重要的意義,縱然沒有很多FTA(自由貿易協定)與參與區域經貿組織護身,但WTO本身及其提供的ITA(資訊科技協定)免稅規定,就是台灣最佳的護身利器。而針對半導體、醫藥等的232條調查就是摧毀台灣ITA護身符的序曲,因為不可能再給相關商品零關稅的待遇了。

但在WTO邊緣化、虛化,加上連ITA免稅規定都被川普打破,這個護身利器被打破,未來風險升高,如果被其它國家引用,對台灣非常不利,這是台灣面對川普治下的全球貿易新規範時,必須特別注意與警惕之處。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Topics

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar

Austria: The EU Must Recognize That a Tariff Deal with Trump Is Hardly Worth Anything

Mexico: The Network of Intellectuals and Artists in Defense of Venezuela and President Nicholás Maduro

Hong Kong: Cordial Cross-Strait Relations Will Spare Taiwan Trump’s Demands, Says Paul Kuoboug Chang

Related Articles

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Spain: State Capitalism in the US

Mexico: Urgent and Important

Peru: Blockade ‘For Now’

Japan: US President and the Federal Reserve Board: Harmonious Dialogue To Support the Dollar