Obama Stood His Ground

Published in The Chugoku Shimbun
(Japan) on 23 March 2010
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Haitham Jendoubi. Edited by Patricia Simoni.
The health care reform bill — the Obama administration’s top priority — has passed the House of Representatives. President Obama postponed his travels to Indonesia and elsewhere in order to make the case to representatives and, by seven votes, the bill barely squeaked by. Precisely because Obama’s poll numbers fell during the polarized debate about the bill, the fact that he somehow succeeded in pulling it off will probably lead to a reassessment of his leadership.

Until now, the United States has never had universal health insurance as Japan has. Public insurance has been limited to Medicare (for those 65 and over) and Medicaid (for those with low incomes). Two-thirds of Americans are enrolled in private health insurance programs. Because they are enrolled through their jobs, when they are laid off, they lose their coverage. Forty-seven million Americans are said to be uninsured.

Because of this, many Americans pinned their hopes on Obama — who called for health insurance reform during last year's presidential campaign — and voted him into office. The House of Representatives tackled this reform and passed a bill last November, introducing a system of public health insurance. In December, however, faced with strong opposition from the Republican Party and others, the Senate passed a modified bill that relied on private insurance.

The main provisions were (1) giving tax exemptions and subsidies to low- and middle-earners and effectively making health insurance mandatory, and (2) strengthening restrictions on the insurance industry by preventing them from denying coverage based on pre-existing conditions. Thereafter, adjustments meant to reconcile the two versions ran into difficulties. The Obama administration embarked on an all-or-nothing campaign. First, it aimed to get the Senate bill passed by the House. Then, it pushed through amendments that reflect the wishes of both houses of Congress. Those amendments look likely to pass the Senate, as well.

Why go to all this trouble? The Democrats lost a by-election for a Massachusetts Senate seat, thus dipping below the 60 seats they need to pass legislation smoothly. It appears as though they have opted for "Plan B" in order to be able to pass the bill with a simple majority.

It was a bitter struggle. They were frustrated at every turn by a conservative campaign against the bill, according to which “introducing public health insurance is a step towards socialism.” At the eleventh hour, it is said that Obama promised “no public funds would be used to fund abortions,” thus convincing conservative Democrats to support the bill.

Under the reform law, health coverage would expand from 83 percent to 95 percent. However, the legislation also contains a time bomb from the point of view of funding. Due to subsidies for low-earners and other provisions, it will cost $94 billion in public expenditure. Although taxes on the expensive insurance plans of the rich and increased efficiency in Medicare are supposed to save $138 billion, worries about the accelerating deficit cannot be waved away.

This reform has been in the works since the 1990s but had been shelved. Due to many compromises made in the midst of heated debate, the bill falls short of universal health insurance like Japan's, but it is certainly an historic step. Obama boasted of "a victory for the American people" and "a victory for common sense."

The focus now will probably shift to foreign policy and economic policies, such as job creation. Japan, which has the Futenma Airfield question hanging over its head, would do well to pay close attention to the momentum of change being shown by the U.S. administration.


医療保険法案可決 踏ん張ったオバマ政権

 米オバマ政権で最重要課題とされた医療保険改革法案が下院で可決された。オバマ大統領は、インドネシアなどを歴訪する予定を変更してまで議員を説得し、わずか7票差でしのぎ切った。国を二分した議論で支持率低下なども招いた法案だけに、何とか実現にこぎつけたことは、リーダーシップの再評価にもつながるだろう。

 米国では、日本の健康保険のような皆保険制度がなかった。公的な保険は、65歳以上の高齢者向けのメディケア、低所得者が対象のメディケイドなどに限られてきた。国民の3分の2は民間医療保険に加入。勤務先を通じて入るため、失業すると受給資格まで失ってしまう。無保険者は約4700万人に上るといわれている。

 このため昨年の大統領選では、医療保険改革を訴えたオバマ氏が多くの期待を集めて当選。改革を打ち出し、昨年11月には公的保険制度を導入する案が下院で可決された。だが、12月の上院では、共和党などの強い反対にさらされ、民間保険を利用するなどに修正された案が可決された。

 (1)中低所得者に税額控除や補助をした上で、保険加入を事実上義務付ける(2)既往症による加入拒否を禁ずるため保険業界への規制を強める―などが主な内容だ。

 その後、二つの法案の一本化をめざす調整は難航。オバマ政権は思い切った作戦に出た。まず上院で可決されたのと同じ案を下院で採決。そのうえで、上、下院の意向を反映した修正条項の可決に持ち込んだ。上院も通過する見込みとなっている。

 なぜこんな面倒なことをするのか。上院では、先のマサチューセッツ州の補選で民主党が敗北し、スムーズな可決に必要な60議席を下回った。そこで単純過半数で通せるよう、「二段階戦術」ともいえる手法をとったようだ。

 激しい攻防だった。「公的な保険導入は社会主義化への一歩」などといった、保守派による反対キャンペーンに悩まされ続けた。土壇場ではオバマ氏が「補助金を中絶には使えないようにする」と確約し、民主党の保守派議員を説得したとされる。

 改革法ができれば、保険加入率は83%から95%に上がる。ただ、財源面では大きな爆弾を抱えることにもなる。低所得層への補助などで、10年間に9400億ドル(約85兆円)の公的支出が必要とされるからだ。富裕層の高額保険への課税やメディケアの運用効率化などで1380億ドル縮減するとはいうものの、財政赤字が加速する不安はぬぐえない。

 1990年代から実現をめざし、一度はお蔵入りになった経緯もある。激論の中で妥協を重ね、日本のような皆保険制度には及ばないが、歴史的な一歩であることは間違いない。オバマ氏は「米国人と良識の勝利」と胸を張った。

 今後は、雇用対策などの経済政策や外交に重点が移ることになろう。「普天間」などの懸案を抱える日本も、米政権の変革の勢いにしっかり目配りしておきたい。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: We Should Take Advantage of Trump’s Vacuum*

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Topics

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Related Articles

Nigeria: 80 Years after Hiroshima, Nagasaki Atomic Bombings: Any Lesson?

Taiwan: Trump’s Japan Negotiation Strategy: Implications for Taiwan

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Japan: Iran Ceasefire Agreement: The Danger of Peace by Force

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far