Democracy More Than Art of Illusion

Published in Rzeczpospolita
(Poland) on 8 August 2008
by Pawel Lisicki (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Julita Kwapinska. Edited by .
Thousands of supporters, colorful balloons, gaudy banners, emotional speeches, exaggerated praises and declarations without coverage - for some people the Democratic convention in Denver can be an example of the progressive degeneration of democratic politics, for others, proof of its vitality.

Indeed, as some of the commentators have noticed, American conventions have slowly come to resemble congresses of past Communist parties or rallies of Amway sales people. It is supposed to be enthusiastic, loud, and dramatic.

It is not important what you say but how you say it. What words you use and what expectations you can arouse among people. And it is hope and faith that Americans, who are tired of the economic depression and the dragging war in Iraq, need the most. Hence the great popularity of Barack Obama, who is a living promise of novelty, a breakthrough, a better future, positive changes, etc. When we think of ObamaÂ’s friendsÂ’ appearances, what he himself wants to tell people and also how important a role the clip with his wife Michelle has played in the campaign, we easily come to the conclusion that politicians nowadays are marketing products, and democracy itself is an art of creating an illusion.

However, this point of view seems a bit narrow. Even if there is a lot of fakeness in those gestures, words, and songs, one has to remember the purpose of the show in Denver. Politicians have to fight extremely hard for votersÂ’ support and trust. The American campaign is first and foremost a test of a candidateÂ’s character and willpower. After all, it is a human being, not better or worse political programs that will be chosen to lead the most powerful country in the world. Courage, charisma, and quick reactions in difficult situations are as important as the ability to analyze rationally. Where could all of those qualities be better shown than during a campaign?


Demokracja á la Denver
Pawe? Lisicki 29-08-2008, ostatnia aktualizacja 30-08-2008 17:25
Tysi?ce zwolenników, kolorowe balony, krzykliwe banery, pe?ne emocji przemówienia, pochwa?y na wyrost i deklaracje bez pokrycia – dla jednych demokratyczna konwencja w Denver mo?e by? przyk?adem post?puj?cej degeneracji polityki demokratycznej, dla innych, wr?cz przeciwnie, dowodem jej ?ywotno?ci.

Rzeczywi?cie, jak zauwa?aj? niektórzy komentatorzy, ameryka?skie konwencje coraz cz??ciej przypominaj? zjazdy partii komunistycznych albo te? zloty sprzedawców Amwaya. Ma by? entuzjastycznie, g?o?no, dramatycznie.

Wa?ne nie to, co si? mówi, ale jak. Jakich s?ów si? u?ywa, jak wielkie oczekiwania udaje si? rozbudzi?. A tego w?a?nie – nadziei i nowej wiary – Amerykanie udr?czeni kryzysem gospodarczym i ci?gn?c? si? wojn? irack? potrzebuj? najbardziej. St?d pewnie te? tak wielka popularno?? Baracka Obamy, który jest ?yw? obietnic? nowo?ci, prze?omu, przysz?o?ci, otwarcia na nowe szanse itd. Patrz?c na kolejne wyst?py jego przyjació?, na to, co on sam ma do powiedzenia i jak wielk? rol? w jego przekazie pe?ni cho?by wideoklip Michelle, ?ony Obamy, ?atwo doj?? do przekonania, ?e wspó?czesny polityk jest przede wszystkim produktem marketingowym, a demokracja sztuk? tworzenia iluzji.

A jednak taki punkt widzenia wydaje si? zbyt w?ski. Bo nawet je?li w tych gestach, s?owach, piosenkach jest du?o sztuczno?ci, to wci?? trzeba pami?ta? o sensie przedstawienia w Denver. Politycy musz? ze wszystkich si? cia?a i duszy walczy? o wyborców, zabiega? o ich g?osy i zaufanie. Ameryka?ska kampania to przede wszystkim próba charakteru i si?y woli. W ko?cu na prezydenta, najwa?niejsz? osob? w najwi?kszym mocarstwie ?wiata, wybiera si? cz?owieka, a nie mniej czy bardziej przekonuj?ce programy polityczne. Odwaga, charyzma, zdolno?? szybkiego reagowania w trudnych sytuacjach, umiej?tno?? gry s? tak samo wa?ne jak zdolno?? do racjonalnej analizy. A gdzie mo?na to lepiej pokaza? ni? w trakcie kampanii?

Skomentuj na blog.rp.pl

Rzeczpospolita
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: The Nobel Peace Prize: Is Trump Eligible?

Saudi Arabia: The Dilemma of the American Initiative in Sudan

Brazil: Record Audiences for the World Cup in the US Shows Interest in Foreign Teams*

Germany: 250 Years of the US — and Trump Is Spoiling the Party for Everyone

Saudi Arabia: Can US Break the Stranglehold of Israel Alliance?

Topics

Brazil: Record Audiences for the World Cup in the US Shows Interest in Foreign Teams*

Mexico: While the World Screams ‘Goal!’ Iran Buries Its Dead

Mexico: Infantino and Trump, Examples of What Not To Be

Saudi Arabia: The Dilemma of the American Initiative in Sudan

South Africa: Despite the Peace Agreements, Trump Has Attacked Iran Again!

Saudi Arabia: Can US Break the Stranglehold of Israel Alliance?

Austria: Iraq’s Prime Minister Squirms as Trump Professes His ‘Love’

Germany: 250 Years of the US — and Trump Is Spoiling the Party for Everyone

Related Articles

Poland: Europe Hears ‘Enough’ from the US: Clever Poles Refuse To Believe It

Poland: Donald Trump’s U-Turn Will Finish Off NATO

Poland: Donald Trump’s Delusions about South Africa

Poland: Trump Sets up Power Directorate: Brussels No Longer Rules Europe

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*