This Judge Is a Loser

Published in El Mundo
(Spain) on 23 June 2010
by Carlos Fresneda (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Lora Dyson. Edited by Harley Jackson.
Warning to readers: this judge is a “loser.” This judge (Martin Feldman) should be cleaning the beaches and the pelicans of the Gulf of Mexico instead of issuing out “justice.” This judge has, or has had, interests in Transocean and Halliburton, which were the two “allies” of BP in the accidental leak, and in four other companies connected to the big oil tankers (Prospect Energy, Hercules Offshore, Parker Drilling and ATP Oil & Gas).

And this judge goes and opines that Obama should not detain the oil drilling in the great marine depths. What an “arbitrary and capricious” decision! Nothing has happened here, so let’s just leave it up to BP’s free will as to whether they will do their part in repairing this disaster.

The most scandalous fact is that this judge — behind the backs of the State of Louisiana and Gov. Bobby Jindal — has been practicing that double standard Republicans have become so good at: with one hand, raising Cain, and making the bed of the oil tankers with the other.

Even worse, the majority of the people of the Gulf of Mexico think that it’s a bad idea to temporarily prohibit oil prospecting and expect the government to be even more permissive in granting new licenses. A New Orleans newspaper, the Times-Picayune, has rallied to the repetitive choir of “Drill, baby, Drill!”, claiming that the temporary close of the 33 exploratory oil wells will mean the loss of 24,000 work positions.

"This is environmental disaster. Let's not make an economic disaster," proclaims lawyer Henry Dart, who represents the State of Louisiana and speaks without a doubt for hundreds of thousands of countrymen that consume oil, which is the pillar of the local economy, next to fishing and tourism.

Looking in from the outside, and contemplating the ravages that already affected the water in the Mississippi delta before the spill, people ask themselves what would have to happen in order for Louisiana and the United States to come out of their proverbial blindness. According to a recent poll from the New York Times, the majority of North Americans want an alternative to oil within the next 25 years, but this same majority opposes paying a cent more for a precious gallon of gasoline.

The crude oil, in the meantime, keeps poisoning the sea at the rate of 60,000 barrels per day, and it’s been 64 days.


Este juez está "pringao"
Aviso a los lectores: este juez está “pringao”. Este juez (Martin Feldman) debería estar limpiando las playas y los pelícanos del Golfo de México en vez de impartir “justicia”. Este juez tiene o ha tenido intereses en Transocean y Halliburton (los dos “aliados” de BP en el pozo accidentado) y en otras cuatro compañías vinculadas a las grandes petroleras (Prospect Energy, Hercules Offshore, Parker Drilling y ATP Oil & Gas).
Y este juez va y dictamina que Obama no es quién para detener las perforaciones petrolíferas en las grandes profundidades marinas. Que se trata de una decisión “arbitraria y caprichosa”. Que aquí no ha pasado nada, vamos, y que BP y compañía deben tener carta blanca para seguir haciendo de las suyas como hasta ahora.
Lo más escandoloso del tema es que este juez tiene detrás al estado de Luisiana y al gobernador Bobby Jindal, practicando ese doble juego al que nos tienen aconstumbrados los republicanos: con una mano, poniendo el grito en el cielo; con la otra, haciendo al cama a las petroleras.
Peor aún, la mayoría de la gente del Golfo de México piensa que es una “mala idea” prohibir temporalmente las prospecciones petrolíferas y considera que el Gobierno debería ser aún más permisivo a la hora de conceder nuevas licencias. El periódico de Nueva Orleans, The Times-Picayune, se ha unido al coro renovado del “Drill, baby, Drill!” alegando que el cierre temporal de los 33 pozos exploratorios supondrá la pérdida de 24.000 puestos de trabajo.
“No podemos enmendar un desastre ecológico con un desastre económico”, asegura el abogado Henry Dart, que representa al estado de Luisiana y habla sin duda por los cientos de miles de paisanos que comen del petróleo (el pilar de la economía local, junto a la pesca y el turismo).
Viniendo de fuera, y contemplando los estragos que causaba ya el petróleo en el delta del Misisipí antes del vertido, uno se pregunta qué tendrá que pasar para que Luisiana y Estados Unidos salgan de su proverbial ceguera. Según un reciente sondeo del New York Times, la mayoría de los norteamericanos quiere una alternativa al petróleo antes de 25 años, pero la misma mayoría se opone a pagar una céntimo más por el sacrosanto galón de gasolina.
El crudo, entre tanto, sigue evenenando el mar a razón de 60.000 barriles diarios. Y van 64 días...

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Topics

Venezuela: Charlie Kirk and the 2nd Amendment

Spain: Charlie Kirk and the Awful People Celebrating His Death

Germany: Trump Declares War on Cities

Japan: US Signing of Japan Tariffs: Reject Self-Righteousness and Fulfill Agreement

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?