Obama on Iraq and His Bridge to Bush

Published in la Repubblica
(Italy) on 1 September 2010
by Federico Rampini (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Hillary Donnell. Edited by Stefanie Carignan.
In his discussion on Iraq yesterday evening, Obama went above and beyond the act of political courtesy that he extended to Bush during his telephone call with the former president. (A formal step to show the nation that the president who is going to end the war must first inform him who started it)

On live television in front of the nation at eight in the evening, Obama wanted to remind the public that the question of the war divided America and that he was against it (not an insignificant factor in his victory over Hillary in the primaries), but he also added that “there were patriots who supported this war and patriots who opposed it.”

It was a true gesture of reconciliation in an attempt to close the book of poisonous attacks and reciprocal delegitimization.

Unfortunately with the way things are going now, (with the Tea Party’s help, 30 percent of Republicans are convinced that Obama is a Muslim) it’s unlikely that his political rivals will appreciate this gesture.

Nonetheless, it is worth noting it was no easy move on his part. Pulling combat troops out of Iraq is one of the few things that the left wing of his party recognizes as being a part of the “real Obama” agenda that was put forth in 2008.

His affirmation that well-meaning Americans also stood on the other side of the fence is hard for the pacifists to swallow. Naturally, far left-wingers suspect that this hides a sort of Bush-Obama agreement on Afghanistan. But if Obama was thinking only in terms of political advantage, he could have continued to make the distinction between the wrong war and the just war, as he did in the past.



Nel discorso sull’Iraq ieri sera Obama si è spinto molto più in là di quel gesto di cortesia istituzionale che aveva già fatto nel pomeriggio telefonando a Bush. (Un passo formale per rappresentare al paese che il presidente che “chiude” la guerra ne informa per primo quello che la iniziò).

In diretta televisiva di fronte alla nazione alle otto di sera Obama ha voluto ricordare che su quella guerra l’America si era spaccata in due, e lui era stato contrario (una causa non secondaria della sua vittoria su Hillary nelle primarie), ma ha anche aggiunto che “c’erano dei patrioti da una parte e dall’altra, tra quelli che vollero la guerra e quelli che erano contrari”.

E’ stato un vero gesto di riconciliazione, per chiudere una pagina di veleni e di delegittimazioni reciproche.

Purtroppo la deriva che ha imboccato la destra (con il Tea Party, il 30% dei repubblicani convinti che Obama suia musulmano ecc…), fa sì che questo gesto probabilmente non sarà raccolto dai suoi avversari politici.

Però merita di essere sottolineato, perché a lui certo è costato qualcosa. L’aver ritirato le truppe di combattimento dall’Iraq è una delle poche cose su cui l’ala sinistra del suo partito riconosce il “vero Obama”, quello del 2008.

La sua affermazione che anche dall’altra parte c’era un’America in buona fede, per i pacifisti è indigesta. Naturalmente la sua sinistra sospetta che questo nasconda una sorta di continuità Bush-Obama sull’Afghanistan. Ma se Obama avesse voluto pensare solo al tornaconto politico poteva continuare nella distinzione tra la guerra sbagliata e la guerra giusta, come in passato.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Kenya: Lessons from US Midterm Elections: What Young Africans Can Learn

China: 4 ‘Surprises’ in the US Midterm Elections

Canada: Democrats Never Defended Canada from Trump’s Threats

Uganda: Trump, Netanyahu, Political Troubles and Why Uganda Should Be Watching Closely

Topics

Luxembourg: The Unpopular Populist: How Trump Mucked Up the Election for Republicans

   

Ireland: US Voters Have Rejected Data Centers and AI. What Happens Now?

Australia: The Spying Affair Scandal Surrounding Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Could Shape the US-China AI Race

Australia: Donald Trump ‘Would Get Ratings Bump for Firing Pete Hegseth,’ Like on ‘The Apprentice’

Australia: Why Cost of Living Concerns Are Upending Global Politics

Ireland: Irish Examiner View: Time for US Democrats To Plan

Mexico: United States: The Offended Party’s Turn

Related Articles

Italy: Trump Dressed as the Pope on White House Social Media

Italy : How To Respond to Trump’s Tariffs without Disturbing Beijing

Italy: How To Respond to the (Stupid) Tariff War

Italy: Putin’s Sly Ability To ‘Dupe’ American Presidents

Previous article
Next article