Has this been a hidden blessing? Conservative commentator Juan Williams lost his job at National Public Radio (NPR) in the United States where he hosted the program “Talk of the Nation.”
The reason stems from a remark made by Williams while on Bill O’Reilly’s (author of a pornographic novel turned conservative commentator) program on Fox News Channel in which he stated: “When I get on a plane … (and) see people who are in Muslim garb and I think, you know, they're identifying themselves first and foremost as Muslims, I get worried. I get nervous.”
By the way, immediately after his dismissal from NPR, Fox News offered Williams $2 million. With a sum like that, Williams is unlikely to miss his old job, especially since he will be surrounded by politically like-minded colleagues at Fox — the exact opposite of NPR. The transition, however, has been anything but calm. In a country as politically polarized as the U.S., it’s almost unsurprising that there was even a bomb threat at NPR headquarters in Washington. Many attribute the threat to the decision to oust Williams.
Some Muslim groups have validated Williams’ point. Tarek Fatah, founder of the Muslim Canadian Congress, stated: “I am scared when I see women in burkas, how do I know what is behind that? We are victims of these guys [fundamentalists]. A number of suicide bombers who have attacked, have killed people [while] wearing the burka.”
Stephen Schwartz of the Center for Islamic Pluralism, has expressed that “American Muslims have so far failed in our duty to prevent negative perceptions among our non-Muslim neighbors, and many, unfortunately, have taken the existing concerns among non-Muslims as a challenge to assert Muslim identity more aggressively, through forms of dress as well as speech that are often extravagant and excessive."
It is, as always, a problem of perceptions. In fact, it is almost statistically impossible that a Muslim does not fly on your airplane (there are between 1.2 and 1.5 billion followers of this religion worldwide; if we were to live through a clash of civilizations, we would have a September 11 every Tuesday), much less that a Muslim would wear a tunic to make a terrorist attempt. But the bottom line is that fear is prevalent and that, if one sits next to an Orthodox Jew or a priest, he or she would not feel the same if their seatmate were a Muslim.
Unfair? Absolutely. Inevitable? Possibly. But it is also true that, though Westerners have been victims of fundamentalists’ attacks, their principal victims have been, are and will be Muslims who are not “devout” enough. That is why I consider Muslims coming to Williams’ defense so significant: Many of them know that those who will suffer to a greater extent at the hands of the fundamentalists are they themselves.
As Zuhdi Jasser of the American Islamic Forum for Democracy noted, it always comes down to political correctness in the end. Williams was fired for saying what he thought. It does not cease to be paradoxical that his statement would result in just that: a debate about political correctness.
¿Ha sido una bendición oculta? El comentarista conservador Juan Williams ha perdido su empleo en la Radio Nacional de EEUU, la NPR, donde presentaba el programa Talk to the Nation.
La razón son estas declaraciones de Williams en el programa de Bill O’Reilly—autor de una novela pornográfica y reconvertido en comentarista conservador—de la cadena de televisión Fox News afirmando que “cuando subo a un avión y veo a gente vestida con ropajes musulmanes y que creo que se están identificando fundamentalmente como musulmanes, me pongo nervioso”.
Lo cierto es que inmediatamente después de su despido de NPR, Fox News le ha ofrecido dos millones de dólares (1,4 millones de euros) a Williams, con lo que éste no creo que eche de menos su antiguo trabajo. Máxime porque en Fox News va a estar rodeado de correligionarios, justo al contrario que en NPR. La transición, sin embargo, ha sido de todo menos tranquila. En un país con una polarización política tan enorme como EEUU, ha habido incluso una amenaza de bomba en la sede de NPR en Washington, que muchos atribuyen a su decisión de echar a Williams.
Algunos grupos musulmanes han dado la razón… a Williams. Tarek Fatah, fundador del Congreso Musulmán Canadiense, ha declarado que “me da miedo cuando veo a mujeres en burkas. ¿Quién sabe lo que llevan debajo? Somos víctimas de esa gente [los integristas]. Numerosos terroristas suicidas han matado a gente mientras llevaban burkas puestos”.
Stephen Schwartz, del Centro para el Pluralismo Islámico, ha declarado que “los musulmanes hemos fracasado hasta ahora en nuestro deber de prevenir las percepciones negativas entre nuestros vecinos no musulmanes, y muchos, desafortunadamente, hemos, tomado las preocupaciones de los no musulmanes como un desafío que hemos utilizado para reafirmar la identidad musulmana de forma más agresiva, a través de un discurso o de unas formas de vestir que a menudo son extravagantes o excesivas”.
Es, como siempre, un problema de percepciones. De hecho, es estadísticamente casi imposible que un musulmán vuele un avión (hay entre 1.200 y 1.500 millones de seguidores de esa religión en el mundo; si de verdad viviéramos un choque de civilizaciones, tendríamos un 11-S cada martes). Y más aún que un musulmán se ponga una túnica para atentar. Pero lo cierto es que el miedo es libre, y que, si uno se sienta al lado de un judío ortodoxo o de un cura, no piensa lo mismo que si su compañero de asiento es un musulmán.
¿Injusto? Totalmente. ¿Inevitable? Posiblemente. Pero también es cierto que, por más occidentales que los integristas hayan asesinado, sus principales víctimas han sido, son y serán musulmanes que no son ‘suficientemente’ piadosos. Por eso considero muy significativo el hecho de que Williams haya sido defendido por musulmanes: muchos de ellos saben que quienes van a sufrir en mayor grado con los integristas son ellos mismos.
Al final, lo que está siempre es la corrección política, como ha declarado Zuhdi Jasser, el Foro Islámico Americano para la Democracia. Williams fue despedido por decir lo que pensaba. No deja de ser paradójico que su intervención se produjera, precisamente, en un debate acerca de la corrección política.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.
The madness lies in asserting something ... contrary to all evidence and intelligence. The method is doing it again and again, relentlessly, at full volume ... This is how Trump became president twice.