We haven't seen this type of logic since the glorious days of Guantanamo.
In a decision by the Pentagon, Bradley Manning, the soldier waiting to go on trial for leaking documents to WikiLeaks, now has to hand over his underwear every night.
It is a “precautionary measure” to prevent him from harming himself, explained the spokesperson from the military prison at Quantico (Virginia) where the soldier has been held since July 2010.
The Army refused to specify what incident (if any) has forced the soldier to surrender his underwear every evening.
“To discuss the details would be a violation of Manning’s privacy,” Lt. Brian Villiard explained to The New York Times.
He is allowed to have two blankets. He sleeps under constant video surveillance. Every morning he, like the other inmates, is required to stand outside his cell for a morning inspection. Still without his underwear.
Why this added humiliation? Because returning his underwear before roll call would mean waking him up early, the spokesperson indicated. And the Army doesn’t practice this type of cruelty.
Une logique pareille, on n’avait pas vu depuis les plus beaux jours de Guantanamo.
Bradley Manning, le soldat qui attend d’être jugé pour les fuites de Wikileaks, est désormais privé de son slip pendant la nuit, sur décision du Pentagone.
C’est une “mesure de précaution” pour l’empêcher de se mutiler, a expliqué le porte-parole de la prison militaire de Quantico (Virginie) où le soldat est détenu depuis juillet 2010.
L’armée a refusé de préciser quel incident (if any) avait conduit à forcer le soldat à se défaire tous les soirs de ses sous-vêtements.
- “Donner des détails serait une violation de sa vie privée”, a expliqué le lieutenant Brian Villiard au New York Times.
Bradley Manning a droit à deux couvertures. Il dort sous surveillance constante de caméras.
Le matin, il est contraint de sortir de sa cellule dès le réveil comme les autres détenus pour l’inspection. Toujours sans son slip.
Pourquoi cette humiliation supplémentaire ? Parce que pour lui rendre son slip avant l’appel, il faudrait le réveiller avant l’heure, a indiqué le porte-parole. Et l’armée n’a pas ce genre de cruauté.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
European autonomy - military, technological, economic, and financial - is beginning to take shape as Europe hedges against current and future fluctuations in [U.S.] policy.