Arabs and Women Secretary of State


So far, the experience Arabs had with the two women who held the State Department, Madeleine Albright and Condoleezza Rice, has been extremely bad; we don’t know yet how the third experience with Hillary Clinton will be considering what this woman believes in and not what she said in front of the Jewish organizations committee (IEPAC) in last June. If her president Barack Obama complimented the committee when he supported making Jerusalem the unified capital of Israel refusing to divide it between the Palestinians and the Israelis and ignoring the international resolutions, Hillary was honest when she addressed the committee with tears in her eyes confirming that she will wipe off anyone threatening the existence of Israel if she was to be the U.S. president; what accompanied this strict stance in supporting Israel reflected the deep belief of this woman in Judaism and Zionism and reveled a secret that will be obvious in the future political stances when she becomes the secretary of state.

This secret reveals Hillary’s ideas and the fact that she is closer to the radical wing of the Republicans than of the Democratic, and that she is stricter than the neo-conservatives or the extremists who ruled the White House for eight dry years; this fact Hillary couldn’t hide during preparing for the elections or when she was buying the Jews’ votes by crying over Israel’s security and the threat from it’s neighbors. She was possessed with winning just because she competed with a colored candidate in the American elections; she was blinded by the idea that Americans would not vote for a black president and was convinced in winning even before the voting; this was the reason why Hillary revealed what she believes in and her belief in the future of Israel more that the future of the United States itself, and that she devoutly believes that protecting Israel, even when Israel is the aggressor, is a way to worship and get closer to her God.

In America, it is clearly said that Hillary is Republican in principle and idea and that she is Democrat only because her husband Bill Clinton is; but there is a huge difference between her ideas and his, he is moderate compared to America’s presidents and she is too strict compared to Democrats; if we add Hillary’s experiences and her knowledge of the Palestinian case and her personal experience on the best negotiation years between the Israelis and the Palestinians, then the future won’t be that bright. If she knew the complications of the Arab-Israeli conflict and was the only first lady to visit the occupied Palestine and show her compassion with the people there, then she’d end up supporting this occupation, this means that the lady so excited to nail Israel’s enemies will practice the diplomacy of hatred repeating the diplomacy of Jeane Kirkpatrick, US representative in the United Nations during the Regan rule, who nearly put the Jewish skullcap and recited the Torah anthems before the sessions of the UN.

The same feelings governed the diplomacy of Madeleine Albright who was the first to hold such a high position after immigrating from The Czech Republic to the United States at the age of eight; the Jewish organizations paved the way for her to reach the place that suits Israel’s lovers – the heart of Washington – in no time. The Arabs’ experience with her was not a pleasant thing to remember; their experience was also bad with Condoleezza Rice who also was the first to end the white and Jews domination over The Department of State. And now, Hillary’s first proper visit will be in March and she will visit Israel to give her respects to the holy lands and begin her glories there… then we will begin along her our four year- or maybe more- journey of things that have been seen and things that remain to be seen, things that have been discussed and things that remain to be discussed…

About this publication


Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply