The Embargo Is Aggression of the Worst Kind

Published in El Nacional
(Dominican Republic ) on 30 October 2010
by Lilliam Oviedo (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Arie Braizblot. Edited by Heidi Kaufmann.
Susan Rice, the African-American ambassador of the United States to the United Nations, was represented last Tuesday before the General Assembly by the same deputy ambassador that in 2005 represented the ultraconservative John Bolton: Ronald D. Godard.* Why change the spokesperson if the task is to repeat the same arguments to validate the same criminal blockage against Cuba?

“The United States of America, like all Member States, has the sovereign right to conduct its economic relationship with another country,” said Godard. In 2005, Godard presented the same allegation. He said this again in 2008 when, after the lash of various hurricanes, Cuba rejected the assistance that the United States offered.

Half-truths and lies serve the needs of liars, and the construction of allegations derived from manipulated notions is an old tactic used by those who sustain illegitimate power.

The support of the lies and deviousness comes from imperialist pushiness. The embargo doesn’t constitute an exercise of sovereignty, but instead constitutes aggression against Cuba and other countries — first by punishing other countries and today by punishing the businesses that negotiate with Cuba. What right does the U.S. have to legislate for the rest of the world?

Proclamation 3447, which established the embargo, was issued in February 1962, and in January of the same year Cuba was expelled from the Organization of American States (OAS). In 1964, the member states of the OAS — with the exception of Mexico —severed relations with Cuba. The United States converted the OAS into a platform to apply the blockade.

Barack Obama is committed to aggression and subjugation. This is why he has validated with his signature — for two consecutive years — the document that renews the blockade. He never changed the discourse. Almost two years since arriving in the White House, the old seal of the extreme right is evident, and he can’t oblige the movement to hide itself.

The promise of change is shown to be what it is: a fraud.

*Editor’s Note: Ronald Godard is Ambassador and Senior Area Advisor for Western Hemisphere Affairs to the United Nations.


Susan Rice, la afroamericana embajadora de Estados Unidos ante la Organización de las Naciones Unidas, ONU, se hizo

representar el pasado martes ante la Asamblea General por el mismo embajador adjunto que en el año 2005 representó al

ultraconservador Jhon Bolton: Ronald D. Godard. ¿Para qué cambiar de vocero si la tarea es repetir los mismos argumentos

para validar el mismo criminal bloqueo contra Cuba?

“Los Estados Unidos de América, al igual que todos los Estados miembros, tiene el derecho soberano para conducir su

relación económica con otro país”, dijo Godard. En el año 2005, Godard presentó el mismo alegato. En el año 2008 dijo

además que, después del azote de varios huracanes, Cuba rechazó la ayuda que Estados Unidos le ofreció.

De verdades a medias y mentiras, se sirven los mentirosos, y la construcción de alegatos a partir de conceptos

manipulados, es una vieja práctica de los sustentadores del poder ilegítimo.

El soporte de la mentira y del retorcimiento, es la prepotencia imperialista. El bloqueo no constituye un ejercicio de

soberanía, sino una agresión contra Cuba y contra otros países. Primero sancionaba a los Estados y hoy sanciona a las

empresas que negocian con Cuba. ¿Con qué derecho USA legisla para el resto del mundo?

La Proclama 3447, que oficializa el bloqueo, fue emitida en febrero de 1962, y en enero del mismo año Cuba había sido

expulsada de la Organización de Estados Americanos, OEA. En 1964, los Estados miembros de la OEA, con excepción de

México, rompieron relaciones con Cuba. Estados Unidos convirtió a la OEA en plataforma para la aplicación del bloqueo.

Barack Obama está comprometido con la agresión y el sometimiento… Por eso ha hecho válido con su firma, en dos años

consecutivos, el documento que renueva la vigencia del bloqueo. Nunca fue portador de lo nuevo. A casi dos años de su

llegada a la Casa Blanca, el viejo sello de la ultraderecha se hace evidente y él no puede obligarlo a ocultarse... La

promesa de cambio se muestra como lo que es: estafa.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Israel: In Washington, Netanyahu Must Prioritize Bringing Home Hostages before Iran

Indonesia: US-China: Tariff, Tension, and Truce

Spain: A NATO Tailor-Made for Trump

OPD 26th June 2025, edited by Michelle Bisson Proofer: See...

Australia: Donald Trump Just Won the Fight To Remake America in 3 Big Ways

Topics

Spain: Not a Good Time for Solidarity

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Australia: Donald Trump Is Not the Only Moving Part When It Comes to Global Trade

Ireland: As Genocide Proceeds, Netanyahu Is Yet Again Being Feted in Washington

Canada: Canada’s Retaliatory Tariffs Hurt Canadians

Spain: A NATO Tailor-Made for Trump

OPD 26th June 2025, edited by Michelle Bisson Proofer: See...

Related Articles

Dominican Republic : Requiem for USAID

Dominican Republic: Trump versus Harris

Dominican Republic : With Trump, We’re Screwed

Dominican Republic: Kamala Effervescent

Dominican Republic: The Canonization of ‘Saint’ Henry Kissinger