Mitt Romney No Longer in the Race?

Published in Le Figaro
(France) on 9 February 2012
by Véronique Saint-Geours (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Rachel Towers. Edited by Peter McGuire.
The slap in the face that the three Midwest primaries just gave Mitt Romney, the pre-designated winner of the Republican nomination contest, should leave a mark. Paul Begala — former cabinet member under Bill Clinton — is not alone when he claims that the former governor of Massachusetts was knocked out standing up. Begala gives Romney the harshest criticism in an article posted on The Daily Beast. The web site itself commits an “error” by placing under the AP photo of Mitt Romney a caption describing “Rick Santorum at a primary-night party Tuesday in St. Charles, MO.” This photographic dyslexia is troubling in and of itself: It not only presents the wrong person but also shows Romney with a lowered head and truly not the winner he was in Florida. Is Romney done for?

In his piece, Paul Begala rips Romney apart over the huge and unavoidable regression of his performance as compared to 2008. Romney has recently lost states that he’d won four years ago. In Colorado, where he got 60 percent of the votes in 2008, only 35 percent voted for him this year, leaving Santorum to win with 40 percent. In Minnesota, Governor Pawlenty, himself a former presidential candidate, supported Romney and his share of the vote still fell from 41 percent to 17 percent. In Missouri, he lost five points compared to 2008.

With so much money, his 2008 experience, advice, campaign teams and even better hair, how could he lose? And if he loses how can he keep up? His superPAC spent 40 times more than Santorum, yet he found a way to lose against the former senator, a man who lost in his own state the last time he was on a ballot. As a New York Times political commentator cruelly pointed out about Santorum, “In a fair one-on-one fight against Romney, we’d win.”*

We reiterate over and over that Americans find Romney’s personality less than amiable. He’s still a big upper-classman of the establishment who made his fortune in the financial sector that sank the American economy. People think of him as a job destroyer from his years in Bain Capital. His mistakes haven’t made anyone laugh: when he says he doesn’t worry too much about the “poorest,” or he would have “fired” Gingrich (if he’d been part of his team) after one of his contemptuous speeches, or when he thinks he’s funny by describing himself as “jobless,” when the unemployment numbers were 8.3 percent this month. That he continues to make so many gaffes shows that he is neither liked nor accepted.

The leaders of the Republican Party and tea party seem to have agreed not give Romney a platform for the much-desired momentum that would bring him the nomination. The caucuses very easily relay that agreement when it’s “convenient,” e.g. each time Romney thinks he’s finally gotten the upper hand.

Without a doubt, the absence of a true credible candidate allows Romney to continue, for the time being, this perverse game that delays the moment when Obama will have a true adversary. Just as long as the other, equally perverse players don’t tire of it.

*Editor’s Note: This quote was misattributed in the original article. The statement was made by John Brabender, an advisor on Rick Santorum’s campaign, during an interview with John Harwood, a CNBC correspondent and contributor to the New York Times. In the interview Brabender stated, “MO tells me that in a clean one-on-one against Romney, we beat him.”


La gifle que les trois primaires du Midwest viennent de flanquer à Mitt Romney, pré-donné gagnant, devrait laisser des traces. Paul Begala- ancien du cabinet de Bill Clinton- et il n'est pas le seul, déclare l'ancien gouverneur du Massachussetts, K.O. debout et tient les propos les plus durs à son égard dans The Daily Beast. Site web qui lui-même commet une "erreur" en plaçant sous la photo AP de Mitt Romney, une légende décrivant "Rick Santorum at a primary night party, Tuesday In St Charles, Mo". Cette dyslexie photographique est elle-même troublante: Erreur de sujet mais en plus représentation d'un Romney tête baissée et vraiment pas le gagneur de la Floride. Romney est-il fichu?
Dans sa chronique, Paul Begala "assassine" Mitt Romney sur le terrible et incontournable constat du recul de sa performance depuis 2008:
Romney a perdu des états qu'il avait gagnés en 2008. Le Colorado où il avait recueilli 60% des voix. Et seulement 35% cette année. Laissant gagner Santorum avec 40%. Dans le Minnessota, il a chuté de 41% à 17%. Et dans le Missouri, il a perdu 5 points par rapport à 2008.
Comment avec tellement d'argent, d'expérience de 2008, de conseils, d'équipes et même une plus impressionnante crinière, peut-il perdre? Et s'il perd comment peut-il se maintenir? Son super PAC a dépensé quarante fois plus que Santorum. Il a trouvé le moyen de perdre contre Santorum qui a perdu dans son état la dernière fois qu'il était sur le bulletin de vote. Comme le dit cruellement un publicitaire politique de Santorum au NYT "dans un combat à la loyale un contre un contre Romney, on le bat". D'autant que dans le Minnesota, Romney était soutenu par le gouverneur Pawlenty lui-même ancien candidat à la présidentielle.
Et on refait le film en boucle de sa personnalité peu "aimable" pour les Américains. Il reste un grand bourgeois de l'establishment ayant fait fortune dans le métier de l'argent qui a coulé l'économie US. Ses gaffes ne font rire personne. Quand il dit ne pas se sentir préoccupés par les "très pauvres". Ou qu'il aurait "viré" Gingricht (s'il avait fait partie de son équipe) après l'un de ses propos outranciers, parce qu'il a l'image d'un destructeur d'emplois de son époque " Bain Capital". Ou quand il croit se rendre drôle en se décrivant "jobless" sans boulot, même si leur nombre à chuté à 8,3% ce mois ci. Et si autant de citations maladroites sont reprises c'est qu'en plus il n'est ni aimé ni accepté.
Les caciques du parti et les Teapartiers sont, semble-t-il d'accord pour ne pas lui donner l'élan qui le mènerait au momentum tant espéré, puis à la désignation. Ils sont très habilement relayés par les caucuses quand ça "arrange": chaque fois que Romney croit qu'il y est arrivé.
Sans doute l'absence d'un vrai candidat crédible permet-il de continuer un moment ce jeu pervers qui retarde le moment où Obama aura un vrai adversaire. A moins que même les joueurs pervers ne se lassent.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

France: Donald Trump’s Dangerous Game with the Federal Reserve

France: Trump Yet To Make Progress on Ukraine

France: Tariffs: The Risk of Uncontrollable Escalation

France: Donald Trump’s Laborious Diplomatic Debut

France: Trump’s Greenland Obsession