Rest Easy! Obama WillContinue to Spy on You

Published in Il Giornale
(Italy) on 18 January 2014
by Marcello Foa (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Anna Carapellotti. Edited by Bora Mici.
Yesterday, yet another media manipulation operation was staged, and, once again, the media took the bait. Obama, as everyone knows, explained to Americans, and to the world, the United States government’s position.

It was a good speech, composed with wisdom. The ingredients? A pinch of regret: "I never believed in these methods." The promise of reform: "We will limit wire-tapping." The absolution of small mistakes made thus far: "Thanks to digital espionage, we have stopped many terrorists." Finally, the re-assurance that the president is not lying, that he is a true American: "I am one of you." With this, democracy is strengthened.

The result? An avalanche of re-assuring titles in the media: from Twitter, to Internet sites, radio and TV and ending with newspapers.

But is it really true? Of course not. "Datagate" should not be forgotten, like a little, venial sin, but, rather, represents a colossal, systematic and pervasive violation of constitutional rights and personal freedom. A slap on the wrist is not enough. This calls for a thorough investigation of who wanted, authorized and managed the operation. An investigation that Obama is, of course, not even considering.

On the contrary, a thorough reading of his speech reveals that its essence appears to be very different from what was announced: The experts’ recommendations have not been accepted, and the interceptions will continue as before. And, there is an extraordinary development that few media sources have noted: Intelligence agencies now have to obtain permission from a secret court before they can "fish" and utilize information contained in the mega-computer.

Get it? A secret court will be authorizing intelligence agencies! Needless to say, I am comforted ... This is similar to an incident in 2002, when Bush announced the closure of the Office of Strategic Influence, an intelligence program that was the precursor to what we now call "Datagate." The press praised the White House, which then assured the public, "We are not doing these things." In reality, the program was not dismantled. Its name was simply changed—you can read more about this in my book, "Gli Stregoni della Notizia."

How many times has the White House announced its withdrawal from Iraq and Afghanistan, or the closing of Guantanamo? In reality, everything has remained as it was before.

Everything will continue to remain as it was, even now. Don’t worry. Obama will continue to spy on your computers, your phone calls, your text messages and to influence your lives.


*Editor's note: The quotes in this article cannot be verified but are translated correctly.


Ieri è andata in scena l’ennesima operazione di manipolazione mediatica. E ancora una volta i media hanno abboccato. Obama, come noto a tutti, ha spiegato agli americani e al mondo la posizione del governo Usa.

Un bel discorso, costruito con sapienza. Gli ingredienti: un pizzico di rammarico (“io non ho mai creduto a questi metodi”), la promessa di una riforma (“limiteremo le intercettazioni”), l’assoluzione dei piccoli errori commessi finora (“grazie allo spionaggio digitale bloccati molti terroristi”), la rassicurazione che il presidente non mente, è un vero americano (“sono uno di voi”), la democrazia è salda.

Risultato: valanga di titoli rassicuranti su tutti i media da twitter, ai siti internet, passando per radio e tv, finendo con i giornali.

Ma è davvero così? Ovviamente no. Il Datagate non può essere liquidato come un peccatuccio veniale, ma rappresenta una colossale, sistematica, pervasiva violazione dei diritti costituzionali e delle libertà personali. Il buffetto non basta, richiederebbe un’indagine approfondita su chi lo ha voluto, chi lo ha autorizzato e chi lo ha gestito. Indagine che Obama, ovviamente, non contempla nemmeno.

Anzi, leggendo bene il suo discorso la sostanza appare molto diversa da quella annunciata: le raccomandazioni degli esperti non sono state recepite e le intercettazioni continueranno come prima (vedi al riguardo questo post di Carola Frediani).E c’è una novità straordinaria, che pochi media hanno rilevato: le agenzie di intelligence adesso dovranno ottenere una autorizzazione da un tribunale segreto prima di poter “pescare” e utilizzare le informazioni contenute nei megacomputer.

Capito? Un tribunale segreto autorizzerà le agenzie di intelligence! Non c’è che dire: mi sento sollevato…
Come nel 2002, quando Bush annunciò la chiusura dell’”Office of strategic influence”, un programma di spionaggio precursore di quello che oggi chiamiamo Datagate. La stampa l
elogiò la Casa Bianca che anche allora rassicurò i cittadini: “Noi non facciamo queste cose”. In realtà il programma non fu smantellato, gli fu semplicemente cambiato nome (vedi al riguardo il mio Gli stregoni della notizia).
Quante volte la Casa Bianca ha annunciato il ritiro dall’Irak, dall’Afganistan, la chiusura di Guantanamo? Tutto in realtà è rimasto come prima.

E tutto rimarrà come prima anche adesso. Tranquilli, Obama continuerà a spiare i vostri computer, le vostre telefonate, i vostri sms. E a condizionare le vostre vite.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump and Ukraine: a Step in the Right Direction

Canada: Canada’s Retaliatory Tariffs Hurt Canadians

Spain: Global Aid without the US

Topics

Indonesia: Trump Needs a Copy Editor

Indonesia: Trump’s Chaos Strategy Is Hurting His Allies, Not Just His Rivals

Sri Lanka: Epstein Files, Mossad and Kompromat Diplomacy

Sri Lanka: Is America Moving towards the Far Right?

Turkey: Musk versus the Machine: Disrupting the 2-Party System

Canada: How To Avoid ICE? Follow the Rules

Canada: Trump Doesn’t Hold All the Cards on International Trade

Ireland: The Irish Times View on Trump and Ukraine: a Step in the Right Direction

Related Articles

Italy: Trump Dressed as the Pope on White House Social Media

Italy : How To Respond to Trump’s Tariffs without Disturbing Beijing

Italy: How To Respond to the (Stupid) Tariff War

Italy: Putin’s Sly Ability To ‘Dupe’ American Presidents