Ship Which Collided With US Warship Fortunately Not Chinese or Russian

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 18 June 2017
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Fiona McAllister. Edited by Helaine Schweitzer.
On June 17, the USS Fitzgerald collided with a Philippine cargo ship, killing seven U.S. sailors. The USS Fitzgerald was returning to port in Yokosuka, Japan, after performing exercises in the South China Sea when it collided with the Philippine vessel only 60 miles from its base.

Our sympathy goes out to those sailors who died in a noncombat incident. It is hard to imagine a U.S. warship having such a serious collision with a civilian ship as occurred here. As yet, there has been no formal statement regarding the cause of this accident, but public opinion is that it was likely due to an error made on the U.S. warship.

This accident has left a deep impression on many people, including the feeling that U.S. warships are reckless in the western Pacific Ocean. The chances of serious collisions between large vessels are, of course, low, as are the chances of casualties caused by such an incident. As this accident involved a U.S. warship, this coincidence may be based on how frequently U.S. warships sail.

The USS Fitzgerald frequently sailed the western Pacific Ocean for exercises and often into Chinese waters. This time, the USS Fitzgerald was not paying attention. Rules and regulations state that ships must avoid one another on the seas; the rule that smaller ships must give way to larger ships is, unfortunately, only an unwritten rule. The 8,000-ton-plus
USS Fitzgerald collided with the 29,000-ton Philippine merchant vessel, a ship more than three times its size. Facing this kind of colossus, the USS Fitzgerald should have taken care, but it clearly did not demonstrate an appropriate amount of caution at the time.

Normally no one would dare collide with a U.S. warship, especially considering that the setting of this incident was in Japanese waters, an area in which the U.S. Navy’s authority is challenged the least. It is believed that the Philippine merchant ship wanted to avoid the USS Fitzgerald, but still collided with it anyway; it was the Philippine ship’s bow, the toughest part of the ship, which hit the USS Fitzgerald’s weak starboard.

The incident occurred in the very early hours of the 17, at 1:30 a.m. local time, during the darkest hours of the night. However, cargo ships are equipped with many lights for nighttime use which are visible at a great distance. The USS Fitzgerald has the ability to partially minimize its visibility; on top of that, it is comparatively small. The Philippine ship certainly became aware of the USS Fitzgerald later than the latter became aware of the cargo ship. From this perspective, the greater part of responsibility lies with the Americans.

Governments in the Asia-Pacific highly value the U.S. None of them wants their country’s vessels to provoke U.S. vessels, something the U.S. ships know very well, so this could have been a factor in the minds of the U.S. warship’s crew while it was sailing. The helpless crew members were almost all sleeping in those early hours of the morning, and partially relied on automated equipment. Some countries revere the U.S., but this does not automatically mean that the sailors working on their own ships feel the same.
Fortunately, the ship that collided with the U.S. warship was flying the flag of a U.S. ally, the Philippines, and was carrying goods for a Japanese shipping company. Chinese and Russian merchant ships which sail the western Pacific Ocean are also very large. If a Chinese or Russian merchant ship were to have collided with a U.S. Navy vessel, the situation would have become much more complicated; it could easily have been interpreted politically and might have led to a geopolitical crisis.

U.S. Navy ships which use the shipping lanes in the western Pacific Ocean every day should therefore be a little more careful. America’s biggest Navy vessel is an aircraft carrier, of up to 100,000 tons of displacement. The majority of aircraft carriers are several thousand tons, but there are many merchant ships in these waters which exceed 100,000 tons, the largest of which make up several hundreds of thousands of tons of displacement. Regardless of whether the U.S. Navy ship bumped into a small boat or a large ship, it is a tragedy. It is likely that this will result in an interpretation of what the collision means beyond this incident as well.

The USS Fitzgerald’s commander and those who were also in relevant positions of responsibility will undoubtedly be disciplined. Hopefully U.S. ships that sail in the western Pacific Ocean will take caution, not only to ensure their own safety, but also to contribute to the safety of the whole shipping channel area.



撞伤美舰的幸亏不是中俄商船

17日美军“菲茨杰拉德”号驱逐舰与菲律宾籍货船相撞,造成7名美军人员死亡。“菲茨杰拉德”号是结束在南海活动后驶回日本横须贺港,在距横须贺港仅100公里处的繁忙航道中与菲律宾籍货船相撞的。
  普通士兵在非战斗中死亡,令人同情。美国军舰出这么严重的与民船相撞事故,则令人难以思议。
  目前尚无关于这场事故原因的正式说法,但是舆论的多数分析认为,美国军舰操作失误的可能性比较大。
  这起事故给人一些挺强烈的印象,其中之一是在西太平洋航行的美国军舰蛮多的。大型船只严重相撞的概率本来就不高,如今出了一起伤亡惨重的相撞事故,出事的就是美国军舰,这种巧合大概要有美国军舰航行的频繁度做基础。
  出事的“菲茨杰拉德”号驱逐舰的确经常在西太平洋活动,也没少在中国近海出没。“菲茨杰拉德”号这次太不注意了。船只在海上相互避让是有规则的,“小让大”则是不吃亏的潜规则。“菲茨杰拉德”号排水量8000多吨,与其相撞的菲律宾籍商船2.9万吨,是它的3倍多,面对这样的庞然大物,“菲茨杰拉德”号理应小心些,但它当时显然没有表现出应有的谨慎。
  通常是没有谁敢撞美国军舰的,尤其事发地点是在日本近海,那里应当是美国海军的权威最不受挑战的地方。相信菲律宾商船也想对美国军舰“躲得远远的”,但它还是撞上了后者,而且是用它舰首最坚硬的地方撞了“菲茨杰拉德”号薄弱的右舷。
  撞击事件发生在当地时间17日凌晨1点半,正是天最黑的时候。不过货船夜间航行都会亮着很多灯,远远就能看到。“菲茨杰拉德”号有部分隐身功能,加上船又小,正常情况下,菲船发现它肯定比反过来它发现前者要晚一些。从这个角度说,美方的责任也更大。
  亚太国家的政府都高度重视美国,谁都不想自己国家的船只惹上美国军舰,美国海军对此也很了解,这可能是促使美舰航行时船员们比较大意的因素之一。无奈凌晨时分,船员们都昏昏欲睡,而且比较依赖自动化设备,一些国家对美国的敬畏不会转化成那些国家船员们在航行中专门的一根弦。
  幸亏撞伤美舰的商船挂的是美国盟国菲律宾的国旗,而且在为“日本邮船公司”运货。西太平洋上中国、俄罗斯的大商船也很多。如果中俄商船撞伤美国军舰,情况就会复杂得多,很容易从政治上被解读,说不定会引发地缘危机。
  所以经常出现在西太平洋航道上的美国军舰还是应当小心谨慎。美国最大的军舰是航母,不过10万吨排水量。大部分军舰都是几千吨的。而这一地区的商船几万吨、十几万吨的有很多,块头最大的高达几十万吨排水量。无论美国军舰撞上小船还是大驳轮,都是悲剧,而且造成引申性解读的可能性很高。
  相信“菲茨杰拉德”号的指挥官以及相关责任人将会受到处分。希望美国在西太平洋游弋的军舰都能引以为戒,既确保它们自身的安全,也为这一带航道的平安做出贡献。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Topics

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Related Articles

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?