America Is Significantly Cutting Taxes. China Should Take Notice, but Not Panic.

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 4 December 2017
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Dagny Dukach. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
On Dec. 2, the U.S. Senate passed a massive tax cut bill that will lower the federal corporate income tax rate from 35 percent to 20 percent, in addition to lowering personal tax rates across different income brackets. If both the House and the Senate come to a consensus on their two versions of the tax cut bill, and after their votes, the bill is signed by the president, it will finally become law. Analysis of public opinion indicates that the majority of people believe there is a very high probability that this will come to pass.*

Because the U.S. is the world’s most influential economy, this tax cut bill will inevitably have some spillover effects. For some time now, the world’s other major economic powers have implemented (or have started exploring) measures to respond to the bill. Something like a “tax cut contest” situation will be difficult to avoid.

In recent years, controversies relating to tax burdens have been raised repeatedly in the Chinese media. At the end of last year, China was still making noise about the crisis of “the flight of Cao Dewang.”** The public continues to argue about whether the U.S. or China has higher tax rates, with no resolution in sight − tax rates have become a touchy subject. The news of America’s tax cuts has gotten people all riled up once again. Some people have been reviewing the April 2017 declaration from China’s State Tax Administration that called for vigilance against spillover effects from America’s tax cut plan, using the special language of the internet to mock China’s attitude.

In our opinion, we ought to analyze reasonably and objectively what the American tax cuts mean for other countries and what sort of spillover effects they will produce internationally. At the same time, we should support whatever response Beijing delivers to defend the economic interests of China.

Large-scale tax cuts are Donald Trump’s big act to revitalize the American economy. In theory, it will benefit companies by helping them to increase investment and attract capital, talent and other key economic resources from the international market. Trump’s goal is still to plug the serious drain of manufacturing companies, and bring the manufacturing industry back to the U.S. However, it is not at all certain that the tax cuts will bring about these desired results. Many other conditions will be required before the theoretical impact of the tax cuts can be realized.

The tax cuts may benefit both America’s wealthy and America’s middle class, but the basic logic of the plan is fundamentally the richer you are, the more benefits you get. Everyone will pay lower taxes, so the deficit will increase − it’s basic math – and there’s still no such thing as a free lunch. Everyone will share the burden of the deficit, and the result is that the rich will make money day and night, the poor will appear to make money but actually suffer from hidden losses, and ultimately the result will be ever-greater disparity between rich and poor.

Since the Trump administration released the news regarding tax cuts, the Chinese government and the academic community have already begun to discuss a response. In addition, the value-added tax, “Five Priorities,”*** and other measures that have been in place for nearly two years are also helping China respond to the impact of the U.S. tax bill. China’s tax code is very different from America’s tax code. The Chinese corporate tax burden is relatively large, and as such, it would be impossible for China to imitate America. That said, Beijing is paying close attention to any spillover effects from Trump’s tax cuts and will not remain indifferent.

This is a much more complicated situation than we saw after the “flight of Cao Dewang” crisis which riled public opinion. The total tax revenue America will realize is not accurately represented by the single tax cut from 35 percent to 20 percent. If that were the case, there would be no way that the American economy would collapse. But don’t forget, over the course of next year, Trump also wants to raise military spending by tens of billions of dollars. In addition, rumors about America’s tax cuts has leaked, setting off spillover effects abroad. The impact it will have on China’s economy may not be as large as some people think.

The position of the Chinese government is founded on our nation’s best economic interests, while many voices in the media contribute their own ideologies and use catchy slogans to attract people’s attention. In addition, the corporate community can have a relatively strong influence on public opinion, and so the media can easily end up echoing their interests − it is often hard for the public to tell the difference.

In summary, America has made its move, and China will surely respond. Just like the U.S., the Chinese government must also focus on maintaining the long-term superiority of its own country’s investment environment; it cannot allow this country to lose its competitiveness. The Chinese government has its hands on many regulatory levers, and we are very capable of implementing adjustments scientifically and rationally. The Chinese people should be confident that the challenges brought about by Trump’s tax cuts are not being ignored, and will certainly be responded to appropriately.

*Editor’s note: The tax cut bill was approved by Congress and signed into law by President Trump on Dec. 22, 2017.

**Editor’s note: This is a reference to a well−publicized story in the media about a Chinese billionaire who moved production for his business overseas to the U.S.

***Editor’s note: “Five Priorities” refers to a Chinese policy prioritizing reform in the following five areas: cutting overcapacity (“zombie” enterprises), reducing excess inventory, reducing corporate leverage, lowering business fees, and strengthening points of weakness such as poverty, failing infrastructure, disaster relief, etc.


社评:美国大幅减税,中国需重视但不必慌
环球时报
2017-12-04
美国参议院2日通过大规模减税法案,将联邦企业所得税率从目前的35%大幅降至20%,同时分别下调不同收入档的个人所得税。如果参众两院能将各自通过的不同减税法案版本协调一致,再经表决后交由总统签字,减税法案将最终成为法律。舆论的分析大多认为,完成这一程序已经具有了极高概率。
  由于美国是世界最有影响力的经济体,这一减税法案必将产生外溢效应。一段时间以来世界其他主要经济体已经采取了或正在酝酿应对方案,类似“减税竞争”的局面恐难避免。
  近年来中国舆论场多次掀起税负争议,去年底中国还闹出“曹德旺跑了”风波,公众对究竟中美谁的税率更高议论纷纷,莫衷一是,税率成了高度敏感的话题。美国传出大幅减税的消息,再次带来了触动。一些人翻出中国国家税务总局官员今年4月对美国减税计划溢出效应的警惕性表态,以互联网的特殊语言揶揄中方的态度。
  我们认为,应当理性、客观地分析美国减税对其国内的意义和将会产生的外溢影响,同时支持北京为维护中国的经济利益开展应对。
  大规模减税是特朗普振兴美国经济的重磅举措,从理论上说,它有利于企业增加投资,吸引资金、人才等经济要素从世界其他市场的回流。特朗普的目的还包括招徕严重外流的制造业回归美国。不过减税并不必然导致这些结果,必须有一系列其他条件的帮忙,减税理论上的作用才能释放出来。
  减税会让美国富人和中产阶级都受益,但越有钱受益越多是它的基本逻辑。所有人都少交税了,赤字就会增加,这一减一加,最后还是“羊毛出在羊身上”,只不过赤字的坏处要由所有人分担,结果就是富人明赚暗也赚,穷人则是明赚暗亏,最终的结局是贫富差距拉大。
  由于特朗普政府将减税的消息早就释放出来了,中国政府和学界早已开始讨论应对措施,且近两年相继实施的“营改增”、“三去一降一补”等措施也有助于应对冲击。中国税法与美国的区别很大,中国企业税外负担比较重,因此无法效法美国,但北京很重视特朗普减税的溢出冲击,不会无动于衷。
  这件事比“曹德旺跑了”风波之后舆论场上的情绪性看法要复杂得多,美国的总税收并非有一个35%减到20%这两个数字所显示的那种落幅。如果那样的话,美国非垮了不可。别忘了,特朗普一年还要增加好几百亿军费呢。另外,美国减税从一漏出风声,外溢效应就开始释放了,它对中国经济接下来的冲击也不会像一些人想象得那么大。
  中国政府的表态要以我国的经济利益为基础,而舆论场的很多声音则更多带有意识形态的兴趣,注重用简单的口号抓眼球。另外,民营企业群体影响舆论的能力比较强,舆论更容易应和它们的利益,公众对此很难分辨。
  总之,美国出了一招,中国肯定会有所回应。中国政府想必同样注重保持本国投资环境的长期优势,不会让这个国家输掉竞争。中国政府手中的调节杠杆有很多,我们实事求是进行调整的综合能力也更强。中国人应当有足够信心,特朗普减税带来的挑战会受到重视,也一定能得到恰当的应对。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

India: Greenland: How To Handle America That Wants Everything