The First Steps toward Gun Control

Published in El País
(Spain) on 3 March 2018
by Editorial (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Madeleine Ramsey. Edited by Margaret Dalzell.
The U.S. is starting to take concrete measures to avoid more murders

The death of students and teachers at a school in Parkland, Florida may be the straw that breaks the camel's back regarding the leniency of American gun legislation in the acquisition and sale of firearms.

Two major companies, both of which have announced limitations on the age of the buyer and type of firearm available in their stores, have been joined by U.S. President Donald Trump, who has asked Congress to approve a series of conditions to be met by potential buyers — something unheard of until now in his rhetoric.

Until a few days ago, it seemed that the 17 deaths in Florida were going to be another entry on the long list of American victims of easy-access gun laws. The weapon of choice for the majority of murders is a military-grade assault rifle designed for frontline combat, something that has created justifiable controversy over why such a weapon is available to the general public. This has been noticed by Dick's Sporting Goods, the largest firearm retailer in the U.S., which, in an unprecedented move, has announced its intention to stop the sale of this type of firearm to customers under the age of 21. In a similar move, commercial giant Wal-Mart will start asking for a background check before proceeding with a sale. These seem like tiny, common sense changes, but they have not existed in America until now.

President Trump, with his proven ability to capture the mood of public opinion, has recently decided to contradict himself, cut ties with one of his main supporters, the National Rifle Association and join the petition for more regulation. His move is extremely cynical, but could, on this occasion, be the first step to stopping more deaths.






Primeros pasos contra las armas

EEUU comienza a tomar medidas concretas para evitar más matanzas

La matanza de estudiantes y profesores perpetrada en un instituto de Parkland, Florida, puede haber sido la gota que colme el vaso en la laxitud de la legislación estadounidense en cuanto a la posesión y venta de armas.

A la iniciativa de dos importantes grandes superficies, que han anunciado limitaciones en la edad del comprador y el tipo de armas que se podrán adquirir en sus establecimientos, se ha sumado Donald Trump, quien ha pedido a los congresistas que aprueben una serie de condiciones que deberán cumplir los potenciales compradores. Algo inédito hasta ahora en su discurso.

Hasta hace unos días parecía que los 17 asesinatos de Florida iban a ser una cifra más que se añadiera a la larguísima lista de estadounidenses víctimas del acceso fácil a armas de guerra. El que el arma elegida por la mayoría de los asesinos fuera un fusil de asalto de tipo militar diseñado para el combate bélico ha generado una más que justificada polémica en torno a cuál es el sentido de que esté a disposición del público. Así lo ha entendido la cadena Dick’s Sporting Goods, la mayor tienda minorista de armas en EE UU, que, en un gesto inédito, ha anunciado que dejará de vender este tipo de armas y que exigirá a los compradores tener 21 años. En una línea similar, el gigante del comercio Walmart solicitará la presentación de un certificado de antecedentes antes de proceder a una venta. Pueden parecer medidas mínimas y de puro sentido común, pero hasta ahora en EE UU no existían.

El presidente Trump, con su demostrada habilidad para captar el estado de ánimo de la opinión pública, ha decidido ahora contradecirse a sí mismo, cortar amarras con uno de sus principales valedores, la Asociación Nacional del Rifle, y sumarse a la petición de mayores controles. Su movimiento es, otra vez, de un cinismo extremo, pero en esta ocasión puede ser un primer paso para impedir más muertes
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Russia: Will Trump Investigate Harris? Political Analyst Responds*

Canada: Scorning Trump’s Golden Dome Would Be a Mistake

Austria: Soon Putin Will Have Successfully Alienated Trump

Topics

Germany: Trump for the Charlemagne Prize!

Canada: It Turns Out Trump’s Tariffs Were Illegal After All

Australia: Trump’s Tariffs Were Already Ever-Changing. Now, Court Fights Add to the Uncertainty

Austria: Soon Putin Will Have Successfully Alienated Trump

Canada: Scorning Trump’s Golden Dome Would Be a Mistake

Related Articles

Germany: Trump for the Charlemagne Prize!