Inhuman Border

Published in El País
(Spain) on 27 June 2019
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Marta Quirós Alarcón. Edited by Laurence Bouvard.
It is promising that the House of Representatives has approved $4.5 billion to improve the health and safety of migrants.

The chilling image of a Salvadoran man and his daughter – who was less than two years old – drowned and floating on the bank of the Río Bravo is the best illustration of the huge human tragedy that is currently taking place at the United States’ southern border, and of how, when applied to immigration, the simplistic and radical solutions of populist policies do not fix the problem, but increase suffering.

From the moment he started his race for the White House, Donald Trump has appeared continually obsessed by immigration, which he considers to be one of the main national security issues for the U.S. Far from providing solutions or alleviating the problem, his proposals, however, first as a candidate and then as president, have only exacerbated the situation. Where those proposals have not created legal chaos, they have sparked unwanted diplomatic tensions, or, worst of all, have caused completely unnecessary suffering to those detained for trying to enter the United States, as well as their families. It is enough to recall the harsh images of children watching as border police handcuffed their mothers, or of minors separated from their parents for months.

None of this has altered the current administration’s stance. Migrant minors are still being treated in a way that constantly disregards international treaties which protect children from cruelty and neglect, particularly when inflicted by a country’s authorities themselves. The degrading conditions in which 300 minors were kept in a Texas detention center are beneath a republican democracy that was founded and built up precisely as a result of immigration. Trump himself could say a lot about this: his paternal grandfather and his mother were both immigrants. The resignation of acting Customs and Border Protection Commissioner John Sanders – forced out by the outrage of many of his fellow American – is but a meaningless gesture if he is indeed succeeded by a representative of the hard-line wing of Trumpism, as appears to be the case.

In this bleak context, it is promising that the Democratic Party has taken the offensive. The passage of a bill in the House of Representatives providing $4.5 billion in order to improve the health and safety of migrants crossing the border is in line with both basic humane treatment and the U.S. tradition of welcoming immigrants. At the same time, the Democratic Party has started the process of selecting a candidate for the presidential election next year – a golden chance to show a viable alternative to Trump.


Frontera inhumana

Resulta esperanzador que la Cámara de Representantes destine 3.960 millones de euros a mejorar la seguridad y salubridad de los inmigrantes

La estremecedora imagen de un hombre salvadoreño y su hija de menos de dos años flotando ahogados en las orillas del río Bravo es el mejor ejemplo del inmenso drama humano que se está viviendo en la frontera sur estadounidense y de cómo las políticas populistas de soluciones radicales y simplistas aplicadas a la inmigración, lejos de solucionar el problema incrementan el sufrimiento.

Desde que inició su carrera hacia la Casa Blanca, Donald Trump siempre ha parecido obsesionado por la inmigración, a la que considera uno de los principales problemas de seguridad nacional de EE UU. Pero sus propuestas, primero como candidato y luego como presidente, lejos de aportar soluciones o aliviar la situación no han hecho otra cosa que aumentar su gravedad. Cuando no han creado un caos jurídico, han desatado indeseados roces diplomáticos o, lo peor de todo, han provocado un sufrimiento totalmente innecesario a las personas detenidas por intentar entrar en Estados Unidos, y a sus familias. Basta recordar la dura imagen de unos niños que observaban cómo la policía de fronteras esposaba a sus madres o la de los menores separados de sus padres durante meses.

Nada de esto ha movido a la actual Administración, que sigue tratando a los menores inmigrantes con permanente olvido de tratados internacionales que protegen a los niños de la crueldad o desconsideración, especialmente si es ejercida por las propias autoridades de un país. Las degradantes condiciones en las que se mantenía a 300 menores en un centro de detención de Texas son indignas de una democracia republicana fundada y desarrollada gracias precisamente a la inmigración. El mismo Trump podría decir mucho sobre esto: su abuelo paterno y su madre eran inmigrantes. La dimisión del jefe interino del Departamento de Inmigración, John Sanders, forzada por la indignación de muchos de sus compatriotas estadounidenses, es un simple gesto sin valor si, como parece, su sucesor es un representante del ala más dura del trumpismo.

En este desolador contexto resulta esperanzador que el Partido Demócrata haya pasado a la ofensiva. La aprobación en la Cámara de Representantes de una ley que destina 3.960 millones de euros a mejorar la seguridad y salubridad de los inmigrantes que crucen la frontera sí que está acorde tanto con el elemental trato humanitario como con la tradición de acogida de EE UU. En paralelo, el Partido Demócrata ha comenzado a elegir candidato para las presidenciales del próximo año. Una oportunidad única para mostrar una alternativa viable a Trump.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?