A Global Technology Split, a Bigger US-China Standoff: The Effects of the US Election

Published in UDN
(Taiwan) on 14 September 2020
by Philip Yang (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
On Sept. 15, the U.S. government will implement its latest sanctions against Huawei, which will effectively cut the smartphone manufacturer’s production line. What reasons underlie the constant efforts by the Trump administration to block Huawei? And what effect will the upcoming U.S. presidential election on Nov. 3 have on the U.S-China trade and technology wars?

The trade and technology wars are both structural factors in the power struggle between the United States and China. Since both U.S. political parties are currently more hawkish toward China, a difference in the election outcome will not lead to a swift reversal of America’s stance. In fact, this is why many analysts believe that Joe Biden’s China policy will not be much different from Donald Trump’s. Still, the two candidates’ actual policies and their effects will differ.

First, in terms of the trade war, Trump’s trade policies toward China are aimed at reducing the trade deficit and regaining jobs stolen by China. He primarily relies on high tariffs to force China into negotiating trade deals and committing to buying from the U.S. Biden, on the other hand, advocates higher wages and workers’ rights. On the topic of the trade war, tariffs and sanctions, he has mentioned many times that he does not want to see the price of high tariffs eventually passed on to U.S. companies and the American people.

Since the trade war has already entered talks and negotiations, Trump has been satisfied with China’s progress in implementing the first phase of agreements. Regardless of whether Trump or Biden wins, the U.S. will closely watch Beijing’s purchase of $200 billion worth of U.S. goods over the next two years. At the same time, it will want to begin the second phase of trade talks, a critical phase that will test Beijing’s commitment to openness and reform.

If Biden wins, he will probably continue with the first phase that Trump negotiated. Regarding high tariffs and sanctions, however, he may gradually expand the scope of industries sanctioned and the scale of tariffs to advance trade negotiations. No matter who wins, the second phase of trade negotiations will be highly controversial, and whoever is in the White House may resort to using sanctions. At this point, the U.S.-China trade war might erupt once more.

The technology war is actually the key to the U.S-China power struggle. The Trump administration is blocking Huawei and cutting its supply chain in an effort to interrupt or delay China’s technological development. Banning TikTok’s operation in the U.S. is an attempt to prevent new Chinese industries from seizing the current domination of technology by the U.S.

In recent years, the number of academic papers on technology published in China has surpassed that in the U.S.; still, the U.S. leads in many high-tech areas, such as semiconductors. Trump’s prohibition of the export of core technology, manufacturing equipment and design software to China has hit Chinese tech companies hard. But it has also pushed China to speed up production of domestic substitutes and establish a self-sufficient supply chain sooner than planned — and this has given rise to a nickname for Trump: “Trump, the Country Builder.”*

No matter what the outcome of the U.S. presidential election is, the technology war between the U.S. and China will result in a global technology split. Trump’s reelection will accelerate the separation of U.S. and Chinese high-tech industries and technologies, whereas a win for Biden will result in a continuation of similar policies. However, both candidates might change how they would continue to block Chinese companies, because the costs of shutting out Chinese technology are too high: The global supply chain is difficult to break, U.S. companies are unwilling to lose the Chinese market and high semiconductor prices will hinder technology development and innovation. Some degree of adjustment is needed.

Finally, domestic factors are still what will affect post-election policies. The U.S. has the highest number of confirmed COVID-19 cases, racial tensions have created a feeling of general insecurity and the American people are relying on financial help from the government to solve economic and employment problems. Biden has advocated for raising corporate taxes and proposed numerous welfare policies. Therefore, if he wins, he might, under pressure from both the stock market and the economy, ease some of the high tariffs and technology blockades to prevent a larger financial burden from falling on businesses and the American people. However, if he proposes a more comprehensive China strategy, the competition and confrontation between the U.S. and China will be even clearer.

A win for Trump will validate the efficacy of the trade and technology wars and the benefit of anti-China policies in the election strategy. This would be particularly true for Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who, by leading the anti-China strategy, greatly increased his political capital for a possible run in the next presidential election. U.S.-China relations might continue to deteriorate. Or, if Trump is reelected, the risk of societal unrest and political turmoil may increase. In the face of a huge governance crisis, Trump — always one for a deal — may use high tariffs, technology blockades and even the U.S.-Taiwan relationship as bargaining chips in the U.S.-China relationship.

*Translator’s note: The term “Jianguo,” meaning “country builder,” is a first name that was popular among Communist patriots during the revolution, but here is used jokingly by the Chinese to mean that Trump is helping to build a country — just not necessarily the U.S.





美大選影響…科技半球化 美中更對抗

美國政府十五日將啟動針對華為的最新制裁,使得華為手機產線可能「斷供」,川普政府不斷封殺華為,是基於哪些原因呢?十一月三日美國總統大選對於中美貿易戰與科技戰會有怎樣的影響呢?

貿易戰與科技戰都有中美權力鬥爭的結構因素,而且兩黨現在都是對中鷹派,因此不會因為大選結果不同而出現急遽逆轉,這也是為何許多分析都認為拜登的中國政策與川普相去不遠;但在政策層面,兩人選後實際政策上仍會有差異與影響。

先就貿易戰而言,川普針對中國的貿易政策,目標是削減貿易赤字、奪回被中國搶走的就業外,主要以高關稅,迫使中國大陸接受貿易協議談判與採購承諾。拜登對於就業議題,主張提高工資與勞工權益;至於對於高關稅制裁的作法,拜登數次談到中美貿易問題時,指出不願看到高關稅成本最終轉嫁到美國企業與人民。

由於中美貿易戰已經進入貿易談判與協議,川普尚滿意中國執行第一階段貿易協議進度,可見無論川普或拜登,一定會緊盯著北京在這兩年的兩千億美元採購;同時會要求啟動第二階段貿易談判,這會進入到深水區,牽涉到北京政府的開放程度與改革承諾。

因此,如果拜登勝選,對於中美貿易第一階段協議,應該是「川規拜隨」,但對於高關稅制裁,拜登可能在貿易協議有進展前提下,逐步放寬制裁的產業範圍與關稅比例。至於第二階段貿易談判,無論是川普或拜登,皆是高度爭議過程,可能訴諸制裁手段,屆時中美貿易戰將可能再度爆發。

科技戰其實是中美權力鬥爭的真正關鍵,川普政府針對華為的斷供封殺,是要中斷或延遲中國科技發展;禁止TikTok在美國營運,則是要遏止中國新創產業搶奪美國的科技霸權。

雖然近年中國大陸科技論文數目已超越美國,美國在許多半導體與高科技領域仍然領先,川普禁止美國核心技術、製造設備、設計軟體等輸中,雖重擊中國科技企業,但也迫使中國加快推動國產替代,提早建構自主供應鏈,致使川普被戲稱為「川建國」。

無論美國大選結果如何,中美科技戰將造成「科技半球化」,川普連任應會加速中美高科技產業與技術脫鉤,拜登勝選也會維持類似政策;但兩人後續都有可能調整繼續封殺中國企業的作法,因為超級供應鏈難以切斷、美國企業不願失去中國市場、半導體價格偏高不利科技發展與創新等因素,致使科技封殺的成本過高,應會有某種程度的修正。

最後,國內因素仍是影響選後政策的現實考量,美國的新冠確診病患數全世界最高,種族緊張問題致使人心浮動,經濟就業問題更仰賴政府紓困。如果拜登當選,由於他主張提高企業稅,並提出多項福利政策,在股市與經濟雙重壓力下,可能會緩和部分高關稅與科技封殺,以避免造成企業與人民的更多負擔,但會提出更全面的對中戰略,中美競爭對抗態勢更明確。

如果川普勝出,更加肯定貿易戰與科技戰的效益,以及反中政策在選舉策略上的助益,尤其主導反中策略的國務卿龐培歐,大大墊高他競選下任總統的政治資本,中美關係可能持續螺旋惡化。然而,如果川普連任,美國的社會騷亂、政治動盪的風險或會升高,面臨更大治理危機的川普,喜歡交易的川普,高關稅、科技封殺,甚至台美關係或許反而成為中美關係交易的籌碼。

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Germany: Trump’s Opportunity in Iran

Turkey: Europe’s Quiet Surrender

China: US Visa Policy Policing Students

Israel: In Washington, Netanyahu Must Prioritize Bringing Home Hostages before Iran

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

Topics

Sri Lanka: Gaza Genocide: Who Stands for Justice-and Who Stands in the Way?

Turkey: Europe’s Quiet Surrender

Austria: Trump, the Bulldozer of NATO

     

Israel: In Washington, Netanyahu Must Prioritize Bringing Home Hostages before Iran

Ukraine: Why Washington Failed To End the Russian Ukrainian War

United Kingdom: Trump Is Angry with a World That Won’t Give Him Easy Deals

Nigeria: The Global Fallout of Trump’s Travel Bans

Australia: Donald Trump Just Won the Fight To Remake America in 3 Big Ways

Related Articles

China: US Chip Restrictions Backfiring

Thailand: US-China Trade Truce Didn’t Solve Rare Earths Riddle

Taiwan: Taiwan Issue Will Be Harder To Bypass during Future US-China Negotiations

Hong Kong: Amid US Democracy’s Moral Unraveling, Hong Kong’s Role in the Soft Power Struggle

Russia: Trump Is Shielding America*