The US Creates ‘Draconian Laws’ for Personal Gain

Published in Huanqiu
(China) on 23 April 2021
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jaime Cantwell. Edited by Elizabeth Cosgriff.
On April 21, the U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations reviewed and approved the Strategic Competition Act of 2021. Regarding the 283-page bill, the spokesperson of the National People's Congress Foreign Affairs Committee, You Wenze, stated on April 22 that it is full of Cold War mentality and ideological prejudice, reckless misinterpretation, slander and discrediting of China’s development strategy and domestic and foreign policies, grossly interferes in China’s internal affairs and seeks personal gain to the detriment of China.

The U.S. Senate Committee on Foreign Relations had previously issued a statement boasting that the bill represents "unprecedented" bipartisan cooperation and that the United States will mobilize all strategic, economic and diplomatic tools to counter China. Obviously, it is going to push China-U.S. relations toward increased competition and complete confrontation. Next, the bill will be submitted to the Senate and the House of Representatives for approval, and then it will be signed by the president. It is generally believed that given the United States' current attitude regarding China, the bill will be given the green light. After the act takes effect, it will inevitably put pressure on or restrain the Joe Biden administration's China policy. Of course, Biden will still have some room to maneuver.

There is no doubt that this is a draconian law that reflects the will and attitude of the stubborn anti-China forces in the U.S. Congress. In order to suppress China’s development in every way possible, Congress carefully drafted this strategic road map, attempting to erase all aspects of cooperation within the Biden administration on China-related issues, and take over the Biden administration policy’s opposition to China with respect to various points of competition. On the other hand, this bill and its passage is also a manifestation of the U.S. Congress seizing the power of the presidency with respect to its dominant role in foreign affairs.

Some people compare the Strategic Competition Act of 2021 with George Kennan's "Long Telegram" that started the Cold War. Some foreign media commented that once the act takes effect, it is "tantamount to proclaiming the beginning of a new China-U.S. cold war." I have to say that this is a great exaggeration of the bill and those who proposed it. There are more than a few American politicians and scholars who want to be the Kennan of the new era, but in the past 30 years, I have not seen anyone who has this potential.

This bill surpasses the Cold War telegram in terms of word count, but its weight is vastly different. The Cold War telegram has Kennan's insight and calm judgment of the situation. The current bill is just a reckless release of prejudice against, and evil thoughts about, China. More importantly, the "new cold war" is unpopular in today's world and will cause direct and sizable harm to the national interests of both China and the United States. Those who promote the "new cold war" are all history’s sinners.

The promulgation of the bill is largely the result of the United States’ distorted attitude toward China. The fact that Biden is unable, or does not intend, to put a stop to it also reminds us that U.S.-China relations still face great difficulties; even though the Biden administration often says to "cooperate when we should cooperate," it is not easy to achieve. We must be prepared for a long-term struggle against the destructive forces in China-U.S. relations, of which this draconian law is a concentrated expression.

The content of the bill is very complex, and is divided into several major aspects, such as diplomatic strategy, human rights and values, the economy, trade and technology, military weapons, etc., as well as a plan on how to confront China. The relevant Taiwan-related provisions of the bill seriously violate the One China principle and the provisions of the three China-U.S. joint communiqués, sending the wrong signal to the "Taiwan independence" forces.

What needs to be emphasized is that the bill looks aggressive on the surface, but we don’t need to be scared by it and overestimate its power. The U.S. Congress is very good at engaging in such actions. However, the creators of the bill have been deceived by their malice against China, have lost their composure and have no ability to stifle the rise of China. The same saying still applies: "We will not play with the villains, but we also will never allow them to cause trouble."



当地时间21日,美国参议院外交关系委员会审议通过了一部所谓“2021年战略竞争法案”。对这份长达283页的法案,中国全国人大外事委员会发言人尤文泽22日表示,它充斥冷战思维和意识形态偏见,肆意曲解、诬蔑抹黑中国发展战略和内外政策,粗暴干涉中国内政,用心险恶,损人害己。

美国参议院外交关系委员会此前曾发表声明吹嘘称,该法案代表了“前所未有”的两党合作,美国将动员所有战略、经济和外交工具“抗衡中国”。显然,它是要推着中美关系走向彻底的竞争和完全对抗。接下来,法案还要提交参众两院通过,再经总统签字生效。人们普遍认为,在美国当前的对华氛围下,法案会遇到一路绿灯,其生效后势必会对拜登政府的对华政策形成压力或掣肘。当然,拜登还是会有一定的回旋空间。

毫无疑问,这是一部恶法,反映的是美国国会顽固反华势力的意志和态度。为了全面压制中国发展,他们精心绘制出这样一份“战略路线图”,试图将拜登政府涉华议题中能合作就合作的方面全部抹掉,在各个竞争要点上绑架拜登政府整体的对华政策。另一方面,这个法案及其通过本身也是美国国会在外交事务主导权上攫取总统权力的一种表现。

有人将“2021年战略竞争法案”与乔治·凯南当年开启冷战的长电报相比,有外媒评论称,法案一旦生效,“无异于宣告中美新冷战的开始”。不得不说,这真是对法案及提案人的极大抬举。想当新时代乔治·凯南的美国政客、学者不是一个两个,但过去30年也没看出谁有这个潜质。

这份法案仅仅是字数上远超“冷战电报”,分量上却有着天壤之别。冷战电报客观而言有乔治·凯南对格局的洞察与冷静判断,现在的法案只是对华偏见和恶念的肆意放飞。更重要的是,“新冷战”在今天的世界不得人心,将对中美两国国家利益构成直接而巨大的伤害。推动“新冷战”的人,都是历史的罪人。

该法案的出台,很大程度上是美国扭曲对华心态的结果。拜登无力或无意阻止它,这个事实也提醒我们,中美关系的拨乱反正仍面临着非常大的困难,即使拜登政府经常说的“该合作就合作”,实现起来也十分不易。我们要做好与中美关系中的破坏性力量长期斗争的准备,这部恶法就是一个集中体现。

法案的内容十分庞杂,主要分为在外交战略、人权及价值观、经贸和科技、军事武器等几大方面,规划如何与中国“全面对抗”。法案相关涉台条款更是严重违反一个中国原则和中美三个联合公报规定,向“台独”势力发出严重错误信号。

需要强调的是,法案表面看气势汹汹,但我们也不必被它吓到,高估了它的能量。美国国会很擅长搞这样的动作。然而,法案的炮制者已被对华恶意蒙蔽了理性,失去了冷静,根本没能力扼杀中国崛起。还是那句话,“我们不会随小人起舞,但也绝不容他们胡来”。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Cuba: Trump, Panama and the Canal

China: White House Peddling Snake Oil as Medicine