Trusting the US Isn’t the Point; Political Achievements Are More Important

Published in Merit Times
(Taiwan) on 20 January 2023
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Jennifer Sampson. Edited by Lisa Attanasio.
During a recent interview, Zoran Milanović, president of EU member country Croatia, said the U.S and other NATO countries are using Ukraine to start a proxy war with Russia that is currently dragging Europe down. He said Croatia must think about its options in such a war. “Must we become slaves to the U.S.?”

Croatia isn’t the first EU member country to reflect on the Russia-Ukraine war and intentionally make different choices. Last November, the EU proposed an aid package for Ukraine totaling 18 billion euros (approximately $19.6 billion) that Hungary opposed. Because all EU members must approve of aid packages, Hungarian opposition blocked the plan.

Despite outside speculation that Hungary’s opposition to the Ukrainian aid package was due in part to the fact the EU froze 7.5 billion euros in funding for Hungary, Hungary has never approved of the U.S.-led policy on the Russia-Ukraine war. Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán has repeatedly warned that EU sanctions on Russia are like shooting yourself in the chest and suffocating Europe’s economy.

Recently elected chairman of the Democratic Progressive Party, Taiwan’s Vice President Lai Ching-te said, “We cannot let doubt about the U.S. become the public consensus.” Outside of Taiwan, people believe that Lai, who has ambitions for the general 2024 election, will continue President Tsai Ing-wen’s policy of adhering to the U.S. Accordingly, he is not entertaining any doubts about America in Taiwan.

Regardless of its independence, the Republic of China has the power to establish foreign policy in its own interest. Actually, from the perspective of international and regional development, we should reexamine the policy of blindly following the U.S as international politics and economics tend to do. As for the Southeast Asian countries surrounding Taiwan, Singapore Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has repeatedly said, as everyone knows, that while serious tension between China and the U.S. pose a great risk, “Singapore cannot choose sides between the U.S. and China.” At the beginning of this month, Philippine President Bongbong Marcos visited China. In a joint statement, the two countries indicated that as long as conflicts can be resolved peacefully, they will establish direct communication channels between their foreign offices regarding the issue of the South China Sea. Both parties also signed 14 bilateral agreements.

The issue of the South China Sea has always been a source of tension between China and certain Southeast Asian countries. Vietnam has consistently engaged in the toughest and most intense conflicts with China over this issue. At the end of last October, China welcomed General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam Nguyễn Phú Trọng and the two countries issued a joint statement on strengthening and deepening their comprehensive strategic partnership. This has made it possible for China and Vietnam to adopt a principle that Beijing has long promoted of setting aside differences and promoting joint development regarding the South China Sea. America’s attempt to use the South China Sea to divide China and ASEAN countries has thus suffered a setback.

European countries that blindly follow the U.S. have begun to express different opinions in the face of real economic interests. The Netherlands, which owns the lithography machine manufacturing factory ASML, was the first to do so. Recently, the Netherlands asserted it would not immediately accept America’s new stipulations restricting chip manufacturing technology exports to China. Dutch Trade Minister Liesje Schreinemacher stressed that in spite of pressure from the U.S., “we will not easily give in and sign.”

Twenty-seven members of the EU will meet next month to discuss the Made in Europe industrial policy proposed by France, as well as the Net-Zero Industry Act proposed by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen in response to President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act last year, which has seriously impacted the European economy, industry and capital. Von der Leyen said that Europe must develop trade and cooperation relationships with China over technologies related to clean energy. She stressed that Europe should not “decouple from China, the world’s second largest economy.”

Whether it’s Lai Ching-te or Tsai Ing-wen, rulers with power don’t need to ban debate over issues such as whether to trust the U.S. The people are really hoping he government will create development opportunities for Taiwan and improve the well-being of its people.


社論--疑不疑美非重點 治理成績更重要

歐盟成員國、克羅埃西亞總統米蘭諾維奇日前在接受媒體採訪時表示,美國和北約借助烏克蘭對俄羅斯發動代理人戰爭,正在拖垮歐洲;他說,克羅埃西亞要想想,在這樣的一場戰爭中能做什麼選擇?「難道我們該成為美國的奴隸嗎?」

克羅埃西亞並不是第一個對俄烏戰爭提出省思和有意做出不同抉擇的歐盟國家。歐盟在去年十一月提出總金額一百八十億歐元(約新台幣五千八百一十億元)的援烏計畫,但遭到匈牙利反對。由於歐盟援助計畫須全體成員國同意才可實施,匈牙利的反對使得該計畫受阻。

儘管外界推測,匈牙利反對歐洲援烏計畫的部分理由與歐盟凍結提供該國七十五億歐元基金有關,不過,匈牙利始終不認同美國所主導的俄烏戰爭立場,總理奧班.維克多就曾多次警告,歐盟制裁俄羅斯是「向自己的肺開槍,令歐盟的經濟陷入窒息。」

甫當選民進黨黨主席的副總統賴清德日前曾表示,「不能讓懷疑美國的言論成為社會共識」,外界解讀有意競逐二○二四大位的他,將延續總統蔡英文依附美國的政策,因此不容許台灣出現所謂的「疑美論」。

且先不論做為一個自主的國家,中華民國當然有權利和權力,根據自身利益訂定外交政策。其實,從國際和區域發展來看,以美國馬首是瞻的做法,是否還是國際政治、經濟的主流,應再觀察。以台灣周邊的東南亞國家看,眾所周知,新加坡總理李顯龍曾多次表示,中美關係已有出現「嚴重緊繃」的巨大風險,但是「新加坡不可能在美、中之間選邊站。」本月初,菲律賓總統小馬可仕訪問中國大陸,兩國在聯合聲明中指出,同意就南海問題建立兩國外交部之間的直接溝通渠道,前提是以和平處理爭端;雙方並簽署了十四項雙邊協議。

南海問題向來是中國大陸部分東南亞國家之間關係緊張的根源,其中,越南是與中國大陸在南海問題上鬥爭最強硬、最尖銳的國家。去年十月底,大陸邀請越共中央總書記阮富仲訪問,期間,雙方發表了加強和深化全面戰略合作夥伴關係的聯合聲明。這使得中越雙方在南海問題上採行北京向來主張的「擱置爭議、共同開發」原則,得到落實的可能。美國意欲藉南海議題分化中國大陸與東協國家的企圖遭到挫折。

而向來對美國亦步亦趨的歐洲國家,在現實的經濟利益下,也出現不一樣的聲音。先是擁有光刻機大廠ASML的荷蘭日前明確表示,不會倉促接受美國限制對中國晶片製造技術出口的新規定,貿易大臣施賴馬特強調,儘管美國持續向荷蘭施壓,「但我們不會輕易就範簽字。」

歐盟二十七個成員國決定在下個月舉行高峰會討論法國提出的「歐洲製造」產業策略,以及歐盟執行委員會主席范德賴恩提出的《淨零產業法案》,以回應美國總統拜登去年提出的《通膨削減法》,對歐洲經濟、產業和資金造成的重大衝擊。范德賴恩表示,歐盟需要和中國大陸在清潔能源的相關技術上,開展貿易與合作關係;她強調,不應該「與中國大陸這樣的世界第二大經濟體脫鉤。」

不論是賴清德、蔡英文,做為擁有權力的執政者,其實不需要禁止疑不疑美之類的爭辯,拿出治理成績,為台灣創造發展契機、提升人民的福祉,才是民心所盼.

This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Topics

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

India: World in Flux: India Must See Bigger Trade Picture

Palestine: US vs. Ansarallah: Will Trump Launch a Ground War in Yemen for Israel?

Ukraine: Trump Faces Uneasy Choices on Russia’s War as His ‘Compromise Strategy’ Is Failing

Related Articles

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Cuba: Trump, Panama and the Canal

China: White House Peddling Snake Oil as Medicine

China: Prime Take: How Do Americans View US Tariff Hikes?