Trump: Failed Democracy
Published in La jornada
(Mexico) on 31 May 2024
by (link to original)
(Mexico) on 31 May 2024
by (link to original)
Translated from
by Tom Walker.
Edited by Michelle Bisson.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump was convicted on 34 counts of falsifying business records, making him the first former president of that country to be convicted of a felony. Sentencing, scheduled for July 11 pending no further delays, could range from probation to four years in prison. However, any sentence would not affect Trump’s right to be a candidate in the election and, if he wins, to return to lead the so-called beacon of democracy: The Constitution provides only that to be eligible for the office of president, a candidate must be at least 35 years old, be a natural born U.S. citizen, and have been a resident of the country for 14 years.
The Manhattan jury’s verdict has suddenly exposed a chain of deficiencies in the U.S. political electoral system, as well as the deep divisions running through that society. If Trump were to win the election and return to the White House, it would demonstrate how the institutions are unable to prevent a criminal from governing the country. Even more seriously, it would show that a majority of the population is in favor of being governed by someone who systematically breaks the law for his own personal gain. Another possibility is that, as in 2016, Trump might get fewer votes than his opponent but win the election, thanks to the U.S. Electoral College system. In this scenario, the world can see how the country’s determination to retain this process is overriding democracy in the superpower, leaving it at the mercy of demagogues rejected by the majority, but who are skilled at manipulating the loopholes of this 18th century relic.
Ironically in this case, Trump could probably be elected president, but he may be prevented from voting, since state legislatures control the right to vote. The law in Florida where Trump is registered to vote requires that someone convicted of a crime complete their sentence before the right to vote is restored. Thus, even a sentence of probation would prevent Trump from voting. More than just being an incidental matter of a candidate who can’t vote for himself, the situation more seriously reminds us of Republican state laws passed to exclude Black voters who have been disproportionately and arbitrarily targeted by the legal system. Another absurd aspect of this is that if Trump went to prison, Secret Service agents would go with him, as the law provides lifetime Secret Service protection of former presidents.
Nevertheless, the most troubling aspect of these events lies in the reaction of the broad sector of voters who support Trump unconditionally. In addition to the incivility and the propensity for violence Trump showed the judge, the jury and the prosecutor in social media posts, Trump’s followers show a deep mistrust of law enforcement and administration of justice in general, which is spreading to a whole range of institutions. While it may be natural for citizens to distrust the impartiality of the courts because of their poor performance and proven political biases — as is well known in Mexico — we can only explain the refusal to acknowledge Trump’s guilt in the face of overwhelming proof as a kind of mass delusion, a dissociation from reality that defies the evidence.
It is impossible to exaggerate the danger that threatens a country when dysfunctional institutions coexist with an unscrupulous leader whose behavior is clearly sociopathic, and a crowd inclined to follow him to the bitter end. And when the country where this is happening is the world’s greatest armed power, and also controls the global financial system, the risks do not stop at its borders: They threaten the entire international community.
The Manhattan jury’s verdict has suddenly exposed a chain of deficiencies in the U.S. political electoral system, as well as the deep divisions running through that society. If Trump were to win the election and return to the White House, it would demonstrate how the institutions are unable to prevent a criminal from governing the country. Even more seriously, it would show that a majority of the population is in favor of being governed by someone who systematically breaks the law for his own personal gain. Another possibility is that, as in 2016, Trump might get fewer votes than his opponent but win the election, thanks to the U.S. Electoral College system. In this scenario, the world can see how the country’s determination to retain this process is overriding democracy in the superpower, leaving it at the mercy of demagogues rejected by the majority, but who are skilled at manipulating the loopholes of this 18th century relic.
Ironically in this case, Trump could probably be elected president, but he may be prevented from voting, since state legislatures control the right to vote. The law in Florida where Trump is registered to vote requires that someone convicted of a crime complete their sentence before the right to vote is restored. Thus, even a sentence of probation would prevent Trump from voting. More than just being an incidental matter of a candidate who can’t vote for himself, the situation more seriously reminds us of Republican state laws passed to exclude Black voters who have been disproportionately and arbitrarily targeted by the legal system. Another absurd aspect of this is that if Trump went to prison, Secret Service agents would go with him, as the law provides lifetime Secret Service protection of former presidents.
Nevertheless, the most troubling aspect of these events lies in the reaction of the broad sector of voters who support Trump unconditionally. In addition to the incivility and the propensity for violence Trump showed the judge, the jury and the prosecutor in social media posts, Trump’s followers show a deep mistrust of law enforcement and administration of justice in general, which is spreading to a whole range of institutions. While it may be natural for citizens to distrust the impartiality of the courts because of their poor performance and proven political biases — as is well known in Mexico — we can only explain the refusal to acknowledge Trump’s guilt in the face of overwhelming proof as a kind of mass delusion, a dissociation from reality that defies the evidence.
It is impossible to exaggerate the danger that threatens a country when dysfunctional institutions coexist with an unscrupulous leader whose behavior is clearly sociopathic, and a crowd inclined to follow him to the bitter end. And when the country where this is happening is the world’s greatest armed power, and also controls the global financial system, the risks do not stop at its borders: They threaten the entire international community.
Previous article![]( "A Swift and Historic Verdict with Uncertain Political Repercussions")
Next article![]( "The Guardian View on Donald Trump’s Conviction: A Criminal Unfit To Stand or Serve")