World Wealth Redistributed After Two Hundred Years

Published in Sohu
(China) on 24 July 2009
by 汤明哲 (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Guangyong Liang. Edited by Jessica Boesl.
The total population of China and India now exceeds two billion. Now that they are beginning to compete for resources with people in Europe, the U.S. and Japan, the world's wealth will be redistributed. The direction of the flow of wealth has begun to reverse itself after two hundred years.

In ancient times, production equipment had not yet been developed. Natural resources would not have been able to feed the entire population and wars among countries were usually battles for resources.

The competition for survival of the fittest encouraged scientific and technological progress, as well as the development of civilization.

The Industrial Revolution began in Europe. Over the course of two hundred years, every country in Europe took advantage of the Industrial Revolution to strengthen its military might. Europeans nearly conquered the entire world as their colonies grew and the world's resources were sent to Europe.

On the other hand, the Industrial Revolution tremendously expanded the scale of the economy and an enormous amount of capital was required for investment in factory equipment. Thus, a capital market was effectively born. Profits made in the capital market enabled large transnational enterprises to emerge. European countries lost control of their colonies and could no longer use their guns to gain access to resources. Instead, they began to use economic means to determine who would have access to resources. Transnational enterprises played an important role in this transition.

Thirty years ago, the economic growth rate of the European, American and Japanese economies far exceeded that of today's developing countries. The U.S., Europe and Japan acquired both resources and wealth.

Thirty years ago, Europe, the U.S. and Japan produced two thirds of the world's steel. Even today, the U.S. is home to only five percent of the world's population but consumes 25 percent of the world's available resources. Thirty years ago, I was studying in the northeast of the U.S. In winter, the temperature was minus ten degrees outside, but inside it was warm as summer. I had to wear short sleeved clothing.

Over the past thirty years, the poorer countries have begun to develop their economies. The overall standard of living needed to be improved. Therefore, additional resources were necessary. The world's wealth must be redistributed now that more than two billion people in China and India have begun to compete with the six hundred million people living in Europe, the U.S. and Japan for resources. Fortunately, this redistribution of wealth constitutes economic warfare rather than an all-out war of guns, and will be carried out according to economic laws.

In the competition for resources, prices will be responsible for redistributing resources. Cheap labor from developing countries replaces European and American labor, allowing developing countries to earn foreign exchange. Developing countries also compete for resources with Europe and the U.S. in the global market, leading to the price hikes of natural resources in the past few years. The world's wealth is gradually flowing to developing countries from Europe, the U.S. and Japan.

Wealth starts to reverse its direction of flow within two hundred years. Europe, the U.S. and Japan can no longer maintain the same standards of living as in the past and heat in winter will not be enough. However, no country will simply sit by and watch its standard of living deteriorate. Thus, frictions and conflicts among nations begins. In response to the huge trade deficit in the 1980s, the U.S. placed a limit on Japanese cars, making the dollar stronger than the yen and leading to economic stagnation in Japan for 20 years.

The best solution is that Europe, the U.S. and Japan utilize science and technology to assist developing countries with their own productivity and let them have experience economic growth even while these developed countries prosper.

However, the human history is one of constant competition for resources. The tidal wave of wealth redistribution has begun.


  当中国和印度超过20亿人,开始和欧美日等6亿人竞争资源时,世界财富面临重新分配,财富两百年的流向开始逆转。
  古时候,生产设备不发达,天然资源不足以养活全部人口,国与国之间的战争通常是争夺资源。
适者生存,造就了科技进步和文明发展。
产业革命先在欧洲发生,近两百年来,欧洲各国先是利用产业革命所产生的船坚炮利,几乎征服全球,扩建殖民地,将世界各地的资源源源不绝送往欧洲。
  另一方面,产业革命也造成大量经济规模,需要大量的资本投资设备厂房,因而衍生出有效率的资本市场,从资本市场获取的资金助长了大型跨国企业的兴起。欧洲国家的殖民地没落后,它们不能再用枪杆子抢夺资源,开始用经济手段来决定资源的归属,跨国企业扮演了重要角色。
  30年前,欧美日的经济发展远远超过发展中国家的经济水准,所得的差距达到百倍之多,资源和财富集中在欧美日等地。
  30年前,欧美日三地钢铁总产量占全球产量的三分之二左右,即使到现在,美国只有全世界5%的人口,却享用全世界25%的资源。笔者30年前到美国东北部念书时,冬天外边温度是零下10度,室内却温暖如夏,要穿短袖,这是美国极盛的时候。
  近30年来,以前的发展中国家经济开始发展,人民的生活水准也要提升,也需要资源,当中国、印度超过20亿人开始和欧美日等6亿人竞争资源后,世界的财富开始面临重新分配,幸运的是这次财富重分配打的是在市场规律下的经济战,而不是枪炮的战争。
  在资源争夺战中,价格成为分配资源的利器,发展中国家低廉的劳工取代欧美劳工,赚取了外汇,再在全球资源市场和欧美竞争资源,造成了天然资源价格在过去几年中暴涨,世界的财富逐渐从欧美日流向发展中国家。
  财富两百年的流向开始逆转。欧美日无法维持过去的生活水准,冬天的暖气不会再开得那么暖了。但没有国家会坐视本国的生活水准降低,于是国与国之 间的摩擦、冲突开始产生。上世纪80年代在庞大的贸易赤字下,美国对日本车设限,最后再将美元对日元贬值三分之二,造成日本20年经济停滞。
  最好的解决方法是,欧美日利用科学技术,协助提升发展中国家的生产力,让发展中国家和发达国家共同达到经济增长的目的。
  但人类的历史就是一部资源争夺史,财富重分配的大潮已经开始。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Topics

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Russia: Political Analyst Reveals the Real Reason behind US Tariffs*

Poland: Meloni in the White House. Has Trump Forgotten Poland?*

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Mauritius: Could Trump Be Leading the World into Recession?

Related Articles

Afghanistan: The Trump Problem

Taiwan: Making America Great Again and Taiwan’s Crucial Choice

Germany: US Companies in Tariff Crisis: Planning Impossible, Price Increases Necessary

Hong Kong: Can US Tariffs Targeting Hong Kong’s ‘Very Survival’ Really Choke the Life out of It?

Cuba: Trump, Panama and the Canal