Obama’s Climate Policy Disappoints International Community

Published in China Daily
(China) on
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by . Edited by .


This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: The End of the USMCA: A Turning Point for Emancipation

Saudi Arabia: Could There Be a NATO Without the US?

India: India’s Big Fat Wedding Playbook Goes Global

United Arab Emirates: Were Trump’s Military Powers Revoked?

Topics

Mexico: The End of the USMCA: A Turning Point for Emancipation

Japan: New York State Legislature Bill Abolishing the Writing of Mother and Father Is Strange

Saudi Arabia: Could There Be a NATO Without the US?

Saudi Arabia: NATO’s Photo-Op in Ankara

Poland: Europe Hears ‘Enough’ from the US: Clever Poles Refuse To Believe It

China: South Korea Must Reflect on America’s Untrustworthiness

Austria: Birthright Citizenship: They Won the Battle, but Not the War

United Arab Emirates: Were Trump’s Military Powers Revoked?

Related Articles

China: South Korea Must Reflect on America’s Untrustworthiness

Egypt: US Prestige Shattered in the Iran War

South Africa: US Escalates Its Pressure Campaign Against South Africa over Iran and China

India: From Indo-Pacific to Pacific: Delhi Must Prepare for Strategic Loneliness

Italy: Trump’s Weak Compromise

  1. The world may be disappointed by the US policy — I am — but equally, it’s disappointed by the Chinese policy. Else why the split between China and the Group of 77 on verification of CO2 reduction?

    Commonsense is that external verification is essential, not just as a legal constraint, but because in the future it will be essential as a basis of negotiations to keep climate-change reduction on track.

    Yet China refuses external verification which unavoidably raises questions as to its commitment, leading to the split within the 77.

    In the arena of climate change politics, it seems, there are no heroes except, perhaps, the small island nations that will be submerged by rising sea levels and who must speak the truth or be destroyed. No wonder that the Copenhagen conference is doomed.