Expectations for the Nuclear Summit

Published in El Comercio
(Ecuador) on 13 April 2010
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Adam Zimmerman. Edited by Brigid Burt.
The most significant nuclear security-related summit in years is taking place in Washington. It is critical that a serious commitment be made.

This is the most important meeting related to nuclear security of the last 60 years. The challenge: to move beyond declarations and take effective actions that will put stringent controls on the possession of nuclear materials.

The “Big Five” are here: Russia, China, Great Britain, France and of course the host country, the United States. India and Pakistan are also participating, though many people would not consider them nuclear powers.

The leaders of the 47 countries in attendance are thoroughly familiar with the agenda (37 presidents are in Washington).

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s message is clear. She says the threat of nuclear terrorism has increased. Al-Qaida and other groups want to cause chaos, destruction and death. Osama Bin Laden has tried at least twice to buy nuclear weapons on the black market.

The goal is to get a commitment to inventory and safeguard nuclear reserves. Nuclear power has grown to an unimagined extent. One would think that with the end of the Cold War the nuclear threat would have been reduced. The numbers say otherwise. There is enough nuclear material to build 120,000 bombs.

Particularly worrying, according to U.S. Assistant Secretary of State [Arturo Valenzuela] on his visit to Ecuador, is the Iranian threat.

The United Nations, through the Security Council, published a resolution in favor of disarmament in September. Now it must be implemented. Beyond declarations and idealistic documents, what is needed is detailed planning and commitment at the highest level.

It is indispensable to continue implementing nuclear reduction treaties, such as the one recently signed between Washington and Moscow.


Esta es la cita más importante en materia nuclear en los últimos sesenta años. El reto: no quedarse en un documento declarativo y pasar a acciones efectivas que pongan controles rigurosos para la tenencia de material nuclear.

Están los cinco “grandes”, Rusia, China, Gran Bretaña y Francia y, por cierto, el país anfitrión, Estados Unidos. Se juntan además la India y Pakistán, aunque muchos no los cataloguen como potencias nucleares.

La agenda la conocen de sobra los líderes de los 47 países convocados (37 presidentes están en Washington).

La palabra de la secretaria de Estado Hillary Clinton es clara. Ella dice que la amenaza del terrorismo nuclear ha aumentado. Al Qaeda y otros grupos quieren causar el caos, la destrucción, la muerte. Osama Bin Laden ha intentado al menos dos veces comprar armas nucleares en el mercado negro.

Se trata de buscar compromisos para hacer un inventario y asegurar las reservas nucleares. El poder nuclear ha crecido de modo insospechado. Se pensaría que tras la Guerra Fría (el fin de las tensiones entre Estados Unidos y la Unión Soviética), la amenaza nuclear debió disminuir. Las cifras lo contradicen. Hay potencial nuclear para construir 120 000 bombas.

Preocupa, como lo evidenció el Secretario Adjunto de Estados Unidos en su vista a Ecuador, la amenaza de Irán.

Las Naciones Unidas y su Consejo de Seguridad lanzaron una resolución en pro del desarme nuclear en septiembre. Ahora hay que cumplirla. Más allá de las declaraciones y documentos líricos, aquí se trata de diseñar un plan detallado y un compromiso del más alto nivel.

Es indispensable seguir los pasos de acuerdos de reducción como el recién firmado entre Washington y Moscú.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Spain: Trump, Xi and the Art of Immortality

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Topics

Russia: Trump the Multipolarist*

Turkey: Blood and Fury: Killing of Charlie Kirk, Escalating US Political Violence

Thailand: Brazil and the US: Same Crime, Different Fate

Singapore: The Assassination of Charlie Kirk Leaves America at a Turning Point

Germany: When Push Comes to Shove, Europe Stands Alone*

Guatemala: Fanaticism and Intolerance

Venezuela: China: Authoritarianism Unites, Democracy Divides

Israel: Antisemitism and Anti-Israel Bias: Congress Opens Investigation into Wikipedia

Related Articles

Ecuador: A US Law for Ecuador

Ecuador: Ecuador Looks to China for a Commercial Future

Sri Lanka: Lesson for Sri Lanka from Ecuador’s Crises, Its Relations with US and China

Ecuador: The Massacres in the United States: A Recurring Evil

Ecuador: The Glory of Imperial Russia