It's been three months since America began to fight the worst oil spill in history. The first success in this titanic combat was obtained Thursday, with the 1,500 meter deep immersion of a giant, 75-ton stopper to seal off the flow of petroleum in the Gulf of Mexico.
There is no guarantee that the damaged well will withstand the pressure or that new leaks won't occur. This aggravates the problem rather than resolving it. This uncertainty says a lot about the limits of modern technology when it is confronted by problems it created itself.
After weeks of hesitation, paralysis and recrimination, the federal government and BP have begun working together. The success currently chalked up to the giant stopper was the first result of this collaboration.
We must learn from this disaster. It is too early to know what disruptions will follow, but we can trust the Americans. A huge debate about the consequences of the oil spill is already beginning.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
The challenge for Washington is no longer whether it possesses sufficient capabilities, but whether the political system can align those capabilities behind a coherent long-term priority.
The Beijing summit did not produce a major agreement between the great powers on the region, but it firmly established that Middle Eastern crises are now deeply tied to the great-power dialogue.
During the Cold War, the United States occupied the apex of this triangular dynamic, pitting China and the USSR against each other. Today, it is Beijing that occupies that apex.
European autonomy - military, technological, economic, and financial - is beginning to take shape as Europe hedges against current and future fluctuations in [U.S.] policy.