"These are desperate times for America, unless we have Tea Party Guardians protecting our values, we will fall. … The socialists who at one time felt emboldened now feel cornered and threatened. … The Globalists, with all their vast resources are organizing to fight Conservative Patriots, tooth and nail. The Army of Darkness will not be defeated easily; they lust for control of our beloved Nation. They know, if we falter on just one issue they can win all!"
And so begins a document drafted by the American tea party movement meant to generate donations from its "patriot" followers. The contradictory assertions, evident in their letter, are typical of a populist right-wing movement and indicate the political positions of this apparent absurdity on the U.S. political landscape that the tea party seems to represent.
In spite of proving themselves capable of identifying Wall Street's role in the general crisis of the country, the tea party does not advocate that the government prevent the excesses of the great capital through its control. They attribute all evils and dangers to the "socialists," or, according to them, all those who refuse to reduce the State's role and properly support the "invisible hand" of the free market.
"Consider this fact, we are spending our resources faster than ever, just trying to stay ahead of the Socialists onslaught of greed. The fight is forcing us to travel to Washington to meet with decision makers, mail countless letters and make endless presentations," the tea partiers point out in a petition for financial support for their campaigns.
"We fight with pennies, many times marching empty handed against immeasurable odds! All the while the Left-Wing Socialcrats bask in obese pools of ACORN type booty! We no longer can stand by and watch while U.S. Cities turn against law-abiding U.S. Citizens because Citizen Victims want to protect themselves, such is in the case of Arizona."*
A right-wing populist movement is, according to theory, that which combines an anti-elitist position with an attempt to maintain or intensify a repressive social system that favors the privileged. To a large extent, they feed on the popular protests and complaints against the system they represent, seeking to redirect these hostile motivations toward some insignificant part of the privileged elite or against other groups falsely identified as such, especially the marginalized and oppressed who constitute extremely vulnerable, easy targets. These groups serve as scapegoats against those who attempt to channel popular struggles, in order to leave the elite that they essentially protect intact.
Against these scapegoats they successively apply strategies of marginalization, demonization and dehumanization to characterize the members of the chosen group as threatening, inferior, evil, sinful or possessed by the devil. They try to justify their accusations with stereotypes, prejudice, discrimination and other resources to dehumanize and demonize them, frequently using apocalyptic references that form part of a recurring central narrative in the religious, secular, political and cultural discourse of the United States.
Repressive right-wing populist movements are always galvanized by revolutionary movements for national liberation or social reform. They feed on the fear of liberals and the advance of liberal ideals.
Right-wing populism has a long history in the United States. The first of such movements, the Ku Klux Klan, originated after the Civil War as a counterrevolution to both the defeat of slavery and the mobilization and empowerment of the southern black population during Reconstruction (1863-1877), which sought to rectify unresolved issues from the war, in particular regarding the social reintegration of liberated blacks.
In fact, this type of populism is part of the myth that claims the "American people" are represented not by the working-class nor the rich, but the "middle class" or "simple folk" (not to be confused with simple-minded, a term they reject).
A large part of this movement consists of Caucasians, but it would be a mistake to identify right-wing populists or neo-Nazis as solely white, because they aren't. The people that work to live have little education, don't understand the society in which they live and generally react against the rich and educated.
They say, for example, that the gubernatorial candidate for the Republican Party in New Mexico is a woman of Mexican heritage who identifies with the tea party. However, like many other Hispanics in that state, she denies her national origin and is a very conservative, racist and anti-indigenous individual — probably in order to avoid facing discrimination herself.
* Editor’s Note: Punctuation and grammatical errors were present in the original, verified quotes.
“Estos son tiempos de desesperación en Estados Unidos y, a menos que tengamos Guardianes Tea Party que protejan nuestros valores, nos hundiremos. (…) Los socialistas, que alguna vez se sintieron envalentonados, están arrinconados y amenazados ahora. (…) Los globalistas, con todos sus vastos recursos, se organizan para combatir a los conservadores patrióticos, con los dientes y las uñas. (…) El ejército de las tinieblas no será derrotado fácilmente, ellos ansían el control de nuestra amada nación. Ellos saben que, si nosotros vacilamos en algo, ellos pueden ganarlo todo”.
Así comienza un documento elaborado por el Movimiento Tea Party estadounidense destinado a promocionar donaciones de sus “patriotas” seguidores. Las contradictorias afirmaciones que aquí se observan son propias de la derecha populista y dejan ver las posiciones políticas de este aparente absurdo en el panorama político estadounidense que parece ser el Tea Party.
Pese a mostrarse capaces de identificar el papel de Wall Street en la crisis general del país, en vez de abogar por que el gobierno impida los desmanes del gran capital mediante su control, atribuyen los males y peligros a “los socialistas”, que para ellos son todos los que obstaculizan la idea de reducir el papel del Estado y los que no apoyan debidamente cuanto brinde mayor libertad de acción a la "mano invisible" del mercado.
“Consideren que nosotros estamos gastando nuestros recursos con mayor rapidez que nunca para tratar de mantenernos por delante de los socialistas en su acometida de avaricia. Esta lucha nos obliga a viajar a Washington a reunirnos con nuestros legisladores, enviar cuantiosas cartas, y presentar innumerables argumentos”, señalan los del Tea Party en reclamo de ayuda financiera para sus tácticas.
“Peleamos con centavos, muchas veces marchando con las manos vacías contra inconmensurables riesgos. Todo, mientras los socialócratas de izquierda esperan cómodamente el botín. Ya no podemos esperar por más tiempo viendo como en ciudades de Estados Unidos se vuelven contra los ciudadanos obedientes de la ley porque las víctimas ciudadanas quieren protegerse a sí misma, como es el caso de Arizona”.
Un movimiento populista de derecha es, según la teoría, aquel que combina una posición anti élite con esfuerzos por mantener o intensificar un sistema social represivo y de privilegios. Se nutren en buena medida de las protestas y quejas populares contra el sistema que representan, procurando desviar estas motivaciones hostiles hacia alguna sección insignificante de la élite privilegiada o contra otros grupos falsamente identificados como parte de la élite, en especial contra grupos marginales oprimidos que constituyen fáciles blancos y son muy vulnerables. Ellos sirven de chivos expiatorios contra quienes pretenden canalizar las luchas populares, a fin de dejar intacta a la élite que esencialmente protegen.
Contra tales chivos expiatorios aplican sucesivamente técnicas de marginación, demonización, deshumanización para caracterizar a los integrantes del grupo escogido de amenazantes, inferiores, malévolos, pecaminosos o poseídos del diablo. Buscan hacer más fácil la racionalización de sus imputaciones mediante estereotipos, prejuicios, discriminación, y otros recursos para deshumanizarlos y demonizarlos. Contra ellos abundan las referencias apocalípticas, que forman parte de una narrativa central frecuente en el discurso religioso, secular, político y cultural de Estados Unidos.
Los movimientos populistas represivos de derecha se motivan siempre como reacción contra los movimientos revolucionarios, de liberación nacional o por reformas sociales. Se alimentan por los temores a la izquierda y sus avances políticos.
El populismo de derecha tiene una larga historia en Estados Unidos. El primer movimiento populista de derecha fue el KU Klux Klan, surgido como reacción contrarrevolucionaria ante la derrota del esclavismo y la movilización y empoderamiento de la población negra en el Sur tras la guerra civil, durante el período de la Reconstrucción, de 1863 a 1877, para resolver los asuntos que quedaron pendientes de la Guerra Civil, en especial lo relativo a la reinserción social de los negros liberados.
De hecho, el populismo de derecha es parte de la mitología que dice que “el pueblo americano” no se representa ni por los obreros ni por la clase rica sino por la "clase media" o "gente simple" (que no se debe confundir con gente humilde, término que ellos mismos rechazan).
Gran parte de este movimiento es de piel blanca, pero seria un error identificar al populismo de derecha/ neo nazi como de blancos solamente pues no lo es. La gente que trabaja para vivir, tiene poca educación, no entiende la sociedad en que vive, y generalmente reacciona contra los ricos y educados.
Se dice, por ejemplo, que la candidata del partido republicano para gobernadora del estado de Nuevo México es una mujer de ascendencia mejicana que se identifica con el Tea Party pero, como muchos otros hispanos en ese estado, niega su origen nacional y es sumamente conservadora, racista y anti indígenas, probablemente para no ser discriminada ella misma.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
[T]he recent back-and-forth between Washington and Beijing over rare earth minerals looks technical on the surface, but it points to a deeper shift in global leverage.
If the Green Party or No Labels candidates steal enough votes from Biden, they will go down in history as the idiot narcissists who helped Trump return to power and possibly finish off U.S. democracy.
You have it backwards. The Conservative Republican party, the party of Lincoln and until the Democrat party’s KKK started murdering blacks for voting Republican, the party of the black community has always promoted civil rights.
Once the black community got the message, “vote Democrat, or else” most have been obediently voting Democrat ever since. Democrats repealed all of the Civil Rights legislation that the Republican passed after the Civil War and continued to oppose civil rights, while the right-wing conservatives fought FOR civil rights for the next century. The Civil Rights legislation that was passed in the 60’s was legislation written by right-wing conservative Republicans in the 50’s, but which the majority, liberal, progressive Democrat party, including JFK, voted against. Only when threatened by the violence of riots did JFK relinquish and crawl to the Republicans asking them to please proceed with their old, very old civil rights legislation.
Since the 60’s the communist/socialist spin machine has been lying to the world, and now, the conservative, right-wingers are finished with the lies and will set things right…no pun intended.
You have it backwards. The Conservative Republican party, the party of Lincoln and until the Democrat party’s KKK started murdering blacks for voting Republican, the party of the black community has always promoted civil rights.
Once the black community got the message, “vote Democrat, or else” most have been obediently voting Democrat ever since. Democrats repealed all of the Civil Rights legislation that the Republican passed after the Civil War and continued to oppose civil rights, while the right-wing conservatives fought FOR civil rights for the next century. The Civil Rights legislation that was passed in the 60’s was legislation written by right-wing conservative Republicans in the 50’s, but which the majority, liberal, progressive Democrat party, including JFK, voted against. Only when threatened by the violence of riots did JFK relinquish and crawl to the Republicans asking them to please proceed with their old, very old civil rights legislation.
Since the 60’s the communist/socialist spin machine has been lying to the world, and now, the conservative, right-wingers are finished with the lies and will set things right…no pun intended.
Best regards,
gspurlock
http://www.backyardfence.wordpress.com