Search Engine Giants to Link Up to Avoid Malpractice Via Monopoly

Published in The Kobe Shimbun
(Japan) on 2 August 2010
by (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Nathan Biant. Edited by Heidi Kaufmann.
A business connection between major search engine companies to avoid malpractice caused by the existence of a monopoly

It has come to be that the grand coalition between the two great rival powers of the Internet will be realized in Japan. This business linkup will be between Yahoo, a major web portal, and the major American search engine Google.

Due to the extensive amount of information on the Internet, search services (engines) allow users to find the content they want using a keyword. In Japan, Yahoo has just under 60 percent of the market, and Google has 40 percent, but with the cooperation between these two companies, the Yahoo search technology is completely changing so that it uses Google’s technology instead and realistically speaking, will come to monopolize the Japanese market.

Both companies say that the services will go on being independent of one another and will not share information on advertising sponsors and search-users. The Fair Trade Commission has pointed out that this business linkup does not violate the antitrust laws.

Be that as it may, is there really no risk that it will obstruct the exchange of free and varied information? It is essential that the effects of this union are carefully monitored.

As search engines have become a portal to the Internet — and how often they are used has a direct connection to the advertising revenue of the website — many companies have begun competing for this technology.

Yahoo’s method of categorizing information on one’s registered home page is a good feature; however, Google has the advantage in that it can update content speedily because it automatically searches and classifies sentences and words. Google holds 70 percent of the world’s search engine market.

Yahoo Japan’s sources of earnings also come from things like web auctions. Instead of trying to compete with Google when it comes to search engines, they should probably work on strategies of strengthening themselves in other areas.

The American Yahoo currently uses Microsoft search technology but now is planning to go after Google’s. The business linkage between Japan and America has resulted in a “twist.” Microsoft is showing signs of backing up its statement that this linkup was an obstruction to the competitive market, and it is displeasing to related industries.

Even after the linkup, Yahoo Japan will still use technology it developed and is vying for different search results than Google. If by some chance their results are not the same, there are worries that not only will this affect the impartialness of the search services, but also the accuracy of information on the Internet.

So that the users can actually feel that there would be an advantage to having varied information on the Internet, both companies should strive to create fair competition between themselves, even though they are also cooperating with each other.

In keeping up with this sudden evolution of technology, research — dependant on large amounts of capital — is indispensable. Therefore, it is possible that from now on, major companies will continue to cooperate with each other.

The world of the Internet has expanded through ideas and technology that have been created by individuals. Even the global enterprise that is Google originally grew from research started by two graduate students. Regardless of the scale of the operation, the Internet cyberspace is making way for a new world which innovative technology must preserve.




検索大手提携/独占による弊害は避けよ 


インターネットで競合する二大勢力の大連立が日本で実現することになった。ポータル(玄関)サイト最大手ヤフーと米ネット検索最大手のグーグルの提携である。

 ネット上の膨大な情報から、キーワードで利用者が知りたい内容を探し出すのが検索サービスだ。日本では市場の6割弱をヤフー、4割弱をグーグルが占めている。両社の提携でヤフーの検索技術が米国ヤフーからグーグルのものに切り替わるため、事実上、日本の市場は独占状態となる。

 両社は広告主や検索利用者の情報を共有せず、サービスは独立して行うという。公正取引委員会は、提携が独占禁止法に触れないとの見解を示している。

 とはいえ、自由で多様な情報のやりとりを阻害する恐れが本当にないのか。影響をきちんと見極める必要がある。

 検索はネットへの入り口となり、利用頻度がサイトの広告収入に直結するだけに、多くの企業が技術を競い合ってきた。

 ヤフーは登録したホームページ(HP)の情報を分類する手法が得意だ。一方のグーグルは、文章や単語を自動的に調べて仕分けるため、内容の更新に素早く対応できる利点がある。世界の検索市場の7割弱はグーグルが占めている。

 日本のヤフーはネットオークションなどの収益源もある。検索でグーグルと競うより、他の分野を強化する戦略なのだろう。

 米国のヤフーはマイクロソフト(MS)の検索技術を採用し、グーグル追撃を図っている。今回の提携で日米間に「ねじれ」が生じることになる。MS側が競争阻害申し立ての動きをみせるなど、関係業界は神経をとがらせている。

 日本のヤフーは提携後も独自技術を加え、検索結果がグーグルと異なるよう競い合うとする。万一、同じような結果に偏れば、検索サービスの公平性だけでなく、ネット情報の信頼が揺らぐ懸念もある。

 利用者がネット上で多様な情報のメリットを実感できるよう、両社は提携後も公正な競争に努めるべきである。

 急激なネット技術の進化に追いつくには巨額の資金を伴う研究が不可欠だ。今後も、大手の連携が続く可能性がある。

 ネットの世界は個性的な発想や技術によって拡大してきた。グローバル企業のグーグルも、もともとは2人の大学院生が始めた研究が出発だった。企業の規模を問わず、革新的な技術が新たな世界を切り開くネットの風土は守らねばならない。
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Mexico: Trump vs. Cuba: More of the Same

Thailand: Donald Trump Buys Time with Weapons for Kyiv

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Colombia: How Much Longer?

Spain: How To Burst the MAGA Bubble*

Topics

Switzerland: Laughing about Donald Trump Is Verboten

Spain: How To Burst the MAGA Bubble*

Russia: The Issue of Weapons Has Come to the Forefront*

Colombia: How Much Longer?

Germany: Tariffs? Terrific!

Spain: The New American Realism

Mexico: Trump vs. Cuba: More of the Same

Related Articles

India: Trump’s Tariffs Have Hit South Korea and Japan: India Has Been Wise in Charting a Cautious Path

Japan: Iran Ceasefire Agreement: The Danger of Peace by Force

Japan: Trump’s 100 Days: A Future with No Visible Change So Far

Japan: US Administration Losing Credibility 3 Months into Policy of Threats

Japan: US-Japan Defense Minister Summit: US-Japan Defense Chief Talks Strengthen Concerns about Single-Minded Focus on Strength