Stem Cells on Trial

Published in Frankfurter Rundschau
(Germany) on 24 August 2010
by Karl-Heinz Karisch (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Ron Argentati. Edited by Sam Carter.
A U.S. District Court judge has cut off public funding for stem cell research because embryos would be destroyed in the process; this decision has allowed fundamentalist groups to force their will on the public.

What a judge in the United States has decided doesn't mean the end of all hope for millions of patients. He may have enforced the decision to ban the use of embryonic stem cells in medical research because embryos would be killed in the process, but there is a sufficient number of other research groups — both in America and around the world — working with stem cells to benefit those who suffer from diabetes or spinal cord damage. The judge’s decision only shows that fundamentalist Christian groups are able to force their will on the U.S. president and a progressive-thinking majority of Americans. The debate over creationism, the attempt to establish religious creation belief as science, has already shown that the United States has fallen victim to its own magnificent liberality.

The promise that every person is free to practice his or her own religious beliefs must apply in both directions. Religious groups in a secular nation should not be permitted to impose their views on anyone who thinks differently than they do.


Stammzellen vor Gericht
Von Karl-Heinz Karisch
24 | 8 | 2010

Ein US-Bezirksrichter stoppt staatliche Forschungsgelder, weil damit auch Embryonen getötet werden. Damit konnten fundamentalistische Gruppen der Bevölkerung ihren Willen aufzwingen.

Ein Schlag für die Hoffnung von Millionen Patienten ist es nicht, was da ein Bezirksrichter in Washington am Dienstag angerichtet hat. Er hat zwar die staatliche Förderung der Forschung mit embryonalen Stammzellen gestoppt, weil für ihre Erzeugung Embryonen abgetötet worden sind. Sowohl in den USA als auch weltweit gibt es aber ausreichend viele Forschergruppen, die weiterhin mit Stammzellen intensiv an der Heilung von schweren Leiden wie Zuckerkrankheit oder Querschnittlähmung arbeiten. Der Richterspruch zeigt nur, dass fundamentalistische christliche Gruppen dem US-Präsidenten und der in weiten Teilen fortschrittlicher urteilenden US-Bevölkerung ihren Willen aufzwingen können. Schon die Kreationismusdebatte, die göttliche Schöpfungslehre im Biologieunterricht zu verankern, hat gezeigt, dass die Vereinigten Staaten Opfer ihrer großartigen Liberalität werden.

Die Verheißung, dass jeder seinen Glauben frei ausüben kann, muss auch umgekehrt gelten. Religiöse Gruppen sollten in einem säkularen Staat den Andersdenkenden nicht ihren Standpunkt aufzwingen dürfen.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Brazil: Record Audiences for the World Cup in the US Shows Interest in Foreign Teams*

Mexico: Infantino and Trump, Examples of What Not To Be

Uruguay: Uruguay at US-Led Conference on Political Terrorism: Unacceptable and Regrettable

Mexico: While the World Screams ‘Goal!’ Iran Buries Its Dead

Saudi Arabia: The Dilemma of the American Initiative in Sudan

Topics

Afghanistan: 2026 FIFA World Cup: Sport and Politics

Saudi Arabia: Two Leaders Return from Washington

India: Trump’s 200% Pharma Tariff: A Threat to India, a Trap for America

Uruguay: Uruguay at US-Led Conference on Political Terrorism: Unacceptable and Regrettable

Germany: Trump Steals Soccer’s World Cup Show

Taiwan: A Regrettable Funerary Object for an Empire

Brazil: Record Audiences for the World Cup in the US Shows Interest in Foreign Teams*

Mexico: While the World Screams ‘Goal!’ Iran Buries Its Dead

Related Articles

Guatemala: The Return of Nationalism

Germany: Trump’s Fatal Signal to Putin*

Austria: Trump Punishes Merz but Also Weakens His Own Country

South Korea: Trump’s Move To Cut Troops in Germany Must Not Affect Korean Peninsula

Poland: Polish PM Donald Tusk Questions US Loyalty in Financial Times, Targeting Both Parties

Previous article
Next article