If the elite at Davos had a vote, they would vote Democrat. Bill Clinton, 64, dazzled the audience at Davos, just as he has done for the past decade. Obviously, his own talent counts for a lot: In front of 500 people, he has the rare ability to make it seem as if he is speaking to each person individually. Incidentally, the session was titled “A Conversation with Bill Clinton.”
Each person therefore had the impression of sharing secrets with the former president in a fireside chat. Bill Clinton is the same as ever, a campaigning politician who takes aim at the Republicans and is especially critical of “his” party for having lost the midterm elections. “[We] raised $1.6 billion and didn’t spend even 10 percent of it to tell the American people what they had done. We had no national message and they did.”
He is a politician … and also the unremitting ambassador from an America who believes in its ability to rebound: “America always does the right thing after exhausting every other alternative [paraphrased from Churchill] ... we have to finish this exhaustion phase and get the show on the road. Don’t bet against us because we’ll come back again. Everyone who has bet against us the last 200 years has lost money.” Applause could be heard throughout the room. That is called confidence.
Si l’élite de Davos votait, elle voterait démocrate. Comme chaque année (son premier Davos remonte à dix ans), Bill Clinton, 64 ans, a fait un tabac. Evidemment, son talent personnel compte pour beaucoup : il a cette faculté rare, devant 500 personnes, de faire comme s’il parlait à l’oreille de chacun. D’ailleurs, la session était intitulée : « une conversation avec Bill Clinton ».
Chacun avait donc sans doute un petit peu l’impression de partager au coin du feu les confidences de l’ancien président. Mais Bill reste Clinton, un politicien toujours en campagne, attaquant les Républicains et surtout critiquant « son » parti pour avoir perdu les élection mid-term. « Nous avions levé 1,6 milliard de dollars pour ces élections et nous n’avons pas été fichus d’en utiliser ne serait-ce que 10% pour mener une campagne nationale efficace. Tout est parti dans les élections locales… »
Politicien… et aussi inlassable ambassadeur d’une Amérique qui croit en ses capacités de rebond : « l’Amérique fait toujours le bon choix après avoir épuisé tous les autres [Ndlr : une paraphrase de Churchill]… Il serait temps que l’on finisse d’épuiser tous les choix et que l’on prenne la bonne direction. Ne pariez pas contre nous, nous allons revenir. Tous ceux qui ont parié contre nous depuis 200 ans ont perdu de l’argent ! » Applaudissements nourris dans la salle. Cela s’appelle la confiance.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The shift now underway is unlikely to take the form of a dramatic collapse of American power in the Gulf. It is more likely to be subtler and, for the region, more unsettling.
Here was the American president, surrounded by an ultimately submissive team, deciding to go to war on gut feeling and with no visible concern for what it would mean beyond [U.S.] borders.
America’s Achilles’ heel is internal. If it loses this war, it will likely be because much of the media, politicians, and even some of Trump’s allies do not fully understand his policies.
Israel must reduce its military dependence on the United States as much as possible and deepen its technological, military and moral value in American eyes.
European autonomy - military, technological, economic, and financial - is beginning to take shape as Europe hedges against current and future fluctuations in [U.S.] policy.
European autonomy - military, technological, economic, and financial - is beginning to take shape as Europe hedges against current and future fluctuations in [U.S.] policy.