Bolivian President Evo Morales reported that the United States uses the Department of State to damage the image of his government and link it to drug trafficking.
“I think it is part of a U.S. strategy to say that here there is a 'narco-government.' They arrested General Sanabria, and two days later the INCB (International Narcotics Control Board) said that the reduction of coca leaf cultivation was not enough. Simultaneously, the Department of State said that their fight against drug trafficking failed,” said Morales.
Out of respect for the Aymara, there is clearly a connection between simultaneous reports, published by the INCB of the U.N. and the U.S., aimed at disqualifying Bolivia in its fight against drug trafficking. Morales considered the coincidence as a U.S. strategy to damage the multinational government, its credibility and its democracy.
Morales considers these actions to be intended to justify the return of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) to Bolivia, although he confirmed that while he is president, the agency will not enter the country. He criticized the Bolivian opposition, those who demand the return of the DEA, which was expelled in 2008 from Bolivia when Sanabria was anti-drug chief.
Sanabria’s argument was that the agency used the issue of drug trafficking to conspire against the government. That same year, Morales expelled U.S. Ambassador Philip Goldberg for intervening in Bolivia’s internal affairs by supporting the radical opponents of his government.
Morales also questioned why the United States highlights Colombia as the “best country in the fight against drug trafficking, in spite of it being one of the largest producers of coca leaf and with the highest cocaine exportation.” In the same vein, he used irony to say that if Bolivia authorizes the establishment of U.S. military bases on national territory, it will certainly not fall victim to attacks from that government.
El presidente de Bolivia, Evo Morales, denunció que Estados Unidos utiliza al Departamento de Estado para deteriorar la imagen de su gobierno y vincularlo con el narcotráfico.
"Pienso que es parte de una estrategia de Estados Unidos para decir que aquĂ hay un 'narcogobierno'. Detienen al general Sanabria y a los dos dĂas la JIFE dice que no es suficiente la reducciĂłn del cultivo de hoja de coca. Simultáneamente el Departamento de Estado dice que fracasĂł la lucha contra el narcotráfico", dijo Morales.
Para el dignatario aimara, existe una clara relación entre los informes simultáneos publicados por la JIFE (Junta Internacional de Fiscalización de Estupefacientes) de la ONU y el Departamento de Estado, de Estados Unidos, para descalificar a Bolivia en su lucha contra el narcotráfico.
Morales consideró la coincidencia como una estrategia estadounidense para dañar al gobierno plurinacional, su credibilidad y su democracia.
CriticĂł a los opositores bolivianos que piden el retorno de la DEA, expulsada en 2008 de Bolivia, cuando Sanabria era jefe antidrogas.
El argumento de Sanabria fue que dicha agencia utilizaba el tema del narcotráfico para conspirar contra el gobierno. Ese mismo año Morales expulsó al entonces embajador de Estados Unidos, Philip Goldberg, por intervenir en los asuntos internos de Bolivia, al apoyar a los opositores radicales de su gobierno.
En ese sentido utilizĂł la ironĂa para expresar que si Bolivia autorizara el establecimiento de bases militares de Estados Unidos en territorio nacional, seguramente no serĂa vĂctima de ataques desde ese gobierno.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link
.
The message is unmistakable: there are no absolute guarantees and state sovereignty is conditional when it clashes with the interests of powerful states.
If this electoral gridlock [in domestic policy] does occur, it may well result in Trump — like several other reelected presidents of recent decades — increasingly turning to foreign policy.
What happened to this performing arts center is paradigmatic of how Trump’s second presidency ... [is] another front in a war ... to impose an autocratic regime led by a 21st century feudal lord outside of international law.