Should Congressman Weiner Resign?

Published in El Mundo
(Spain) on 9 June 2011
by Ricard Gonzalez (link to originallink to original)
Translated from by Sarah Moore. Edited by Alexander Anderson.
The chorus of Republican voices calling for the resignation of Anthony Weiner, the star of a sex scandal for having sent obscene photos via Twitter and then accusing a hacker, has joined that of Weiner's fellow Democrats. It makes sense because they, including Wiener himself, are the most affected by the scandal.

Without a doubt, the Democratic Congressman has found himself in a difficult situation. It seems incredible that someone in his position and with his ambitions did not learn the painful lesson of Tiger Woods and dedicated himself to sending compromising photos to women he had not even seen in person.

I think politically, however, he could have survived these stupid acts if he had simply confessed the truth when the first photo was published; incidentally, he sent that one out publicly. At the end of the day, compared to other sexual scandals, his story is insignificant, and that is merely pathetic.

Weiner did not violate any law, like politicians caught in brothels, and if we have been told the whole truth now, he did not have sexual relations with any of these women. His greatest sin was lying and showing an impressive impudence in all of the interviews that he gave in the days after the publication of the famous photo of his “package.” We know that in a society as marked by the Protestant ethic as the U.S., lying is hardly excusable, even if only to conceal a private matter.

In a modern version of the old mobs, Weiner has received a media lynching that seems excessive to me. Certainly, he made a grave mistake, but the treatment he has received in some media outlets is itself criminal. It seems to me he’s just a poor devil, though he has a government title.

At the moment, he is trying to resist the downpour without resigning. Maybe he will succeed, especially if he really confessed the whole truth in his press conference Monday, or if in the coming days another sensational story relegates him to the back burner. It will all depend on his ability to be patient. Since he has not committed any illegality, it cannot be put before him that his only choice is resignation or possible jail time.

From my point of view the decision is his alone. A politician should always resign if he is prosecuted, has broken the law or has participated in corrupt practices. That, however is not the case here. It is the case, of course, for Charlie Rangel, who, among other irregularities, “forgot” to pay tens of thousands of dollars in taxes, despite being a veteran member of the committee that approves tax legislation. Nevertheless, he did not receive such strong pressure to resign.

We can only accuse Weiner of having violated the trust that his voters put in him to lie like a scoundrel about his private life. Therefore, if his conscience leads him to resign, it would be an act of honor. If he prefers to let the voters decide his sentence, we will just wait a few months to learn the verdict because the Democratic primaries will be next spring, and they surely do not need enemies.


¿Debería dimitir el congresista Weiner?

Al coro de voces republicanas que pedían la dimisión de Anthony Weiner, protagonista de un escándalo sexual por haber enviado fotos obscenas a través de twitter y haber acusado luego de ello a un hacker, se han unido las de sus correligionarios demócratas. Tiene su lógica, pues ellos son los más perjudicados por el “escándalo Weiner”, además lógicamente del propio implicado.

Sin duda, el congresista demócrata se ha buscado el trance en el que está. Parece increíble que alguien en su posición y con sus ambiciones no aprendiera la dolorosa lección de “Tiger Woods”, y se dedicara a enviar fotos comprometedoras a mujeres que ni tan siquiera había visto en persona.

Ahora bien, creo que, políticamente, habría podido sobrevivir a esos actos estúpidos si hubiera confesado la verdad justo al publicarse la primera foto, que envió de forma pública por error. Al fin y al cabo, comparado con otros escándalos sexuales, su historia es una minucia, por patética que pueda resultar. Weiner no violó ninguna ley, como los políticos enganchados en prostíbulos, y si nos ha dicho ahora toda la verdad, no llegó a mantener relaciones sexuales con ninguna de estas mujeres.

Su mayor pecado fue haber mentido, mostrando una desfachatez impresionante, en todas las entrevistas que concedió los días posteriores a la publicación de la famosa foto de su “paquete”. Ya sabemos que, en una sociedad tan marcada por la ética protestante como la estadounidense, la mentira es difícilmente perdonable, aunque sea para ocultar una miseria privada.

En una versión moderna de las antiguas turbas, Weiner ha recibido un linchamiento mediático que me parece excesivo. Ciertamente, se equivocó, y gravemente, pero el trato que ha recibido en algunos medios es el propio de un criminal, cuando a mí me parece más bien un pobre diablo, aunque ostente el título de señoría.

De momento, está intentado resistir el chaparrón sin dimitir. Quizás lo consiga, sobre todo si realmente confesó toda la verdad en su rueda de prensa del lunes, o en los próximos días sucede alguna bomba informativa que relega su historia a un segundo plano informativo. Todo dependerá de su capacidad de aguante, pues al no haber cometido ninguna ilegalidad, no le pueden poner ante la disyuntiva de dimisión o posible cárcel.

Bajo mi punto de vista, la decisión es sólo suya. Un político debería dimitir siempre si está procesado, ha roto la ley, o ha participado en corruptelas. Pero este no es el caso. Sí que lo es, por cierto, el de Charlie Rangel, que entre otras muchas irregularidades, “olvidó” pagar decenas de miles de dólares en impuestos, a pesar de ser un veterano miembro del comité que aprueba la legislación fiscal. Sin embargo, él no recibió presiones tan fuertes para que dimitiera.

A Weiner tan sólo le podemos acusar de que haber violado la confianza que sus electores depositaron en él al mentir como un bellaco sobre su vida privada. Por lo tanto, si su conciencia le llevara a dimitir, sería un acto que le honraría. Si prefiere dejar que sean los electores quienes dicten sentencia, tan sólo tendremos que esperar unos meses para conocer su veredicto, pues las primarias demócratas a su cargo serán la próxima primavera, y a buen seguro que no le faltarán adversarios.
This post appeared on the front page as a direct link to the original article with the above link .

Hot this week

Canada: No, the Fed Was Not ‘Independent’ before Trump

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Germany: Donald Trump’s Failure

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Topics

Sri Lanka: Qatar under Attack: Is US Still a Reliable Ally?

Taiwan: Trump’s Talk of Legality Is a Joke

Austria: The US Courts Are the Last Bastion of Resistance

       

Poland: Marek Kutarba: Donald Trump Makes Promises to Karol Nawrocki. But Did He Run Them by Putin?

El Salvador: The Game of Chess between the US and Venezuela Continues

Austria: Donald Is Disappointed in Vladimir

Austria: If This Is Madness, There is a Method to It

Germany: It’s Not Europe’s Fault

Related Articles

Spain: Spain’s Defense against Trump’s Tariffs

Spain: Shooting Yourself in the Foot

Spain: King Trump: ‘America Is Back’

Spain: Trump Changes Sides

Spain: Narcissists Trump and Musk: 2 Sides of the Same Coin?